This draft does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Linguistics This draft is within the scope of WikiProject Linguistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of linguistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinguisticsWikipedia:WikiProject LinguisticsTemplate:WikiProject LinguisticsLinguistics Biography This draft is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography Galicia This draft is within the scope of WikiProject Galicia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Galicia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GaliciaWikipedia:WikiProject GaliciaTemplate:WikiProject GaliciaGalicia Cognitive science (inactive) This draft is within the scope of WikiProject Cognitive science, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Cognitive scienceWikipedia:WikiProject Cognitive scienceTemplate:WikiProject Cognitive scienceCognitive science Languages This draft is within the scope of WikiProject Languages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of languages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LanguagesWikipedia:WikiProject LanguagesTemplate:WikiProject Languageslanguage

.

Hi, I've two questions about the draft.

- There are quite a few external links in the 'Scientific committees' section; is this common practice in the English Wikipedia? It seemed unfamiliar to me (I use the German Wikipedia more often than the English one).

- And I think the draft reads almost like an academic CV with a long list of positions, awards, etc. The encyclopedic information I would be looking for as a user would be the stuff in the 'research lines' section. Maybe that could be the bulk of the article? Just my two cents. 2001:16B8:BC53:D700:71B2:52F0:5396:43E0 (talk) 00:15, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]