Talk:Sean Parker: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
ClueBot III (talk | contribs)
m Archiving 1 discussion to Talk:Sean Parker/Archives/2012. (BOT)
71.186.229.250 (talk)
Line 18: Line 18:


http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2334590/First-glimpse-Game-Of-Thrones-style-castle-internet-guru-Sean-Parkers-10m-Big-Sur-wedding.html <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/108.184.252.247|108.184.252.247]] ([[User talk:108.184.252.247|talk]]) 10:04, 2 June 2013 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2334590/First-glimpse-Game-Of-Thrones-style-castle-internet-guru-Sean-Parkers-10m-Big-Sur-wedding.html <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/108.184.252.247|108.184.252.247]] ([[User talk:108.184.252.247|talk]]) 10:04, 2 June 2013 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

wedding destruction reports and fine are false, as called out by the California Coastal Commission itself:

http://documents.coastal.ca.gov/reports/2013/6/F5.1-s-6-2013.pdf

http://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2013/06/sean-parker-responds-to-redwoods-wedding-criticism-and-his-defense-is-actually-pretty-convincing/276553/

Revision as of 01:24, 14 July 2015

date of birth

Have we got a WP:RS for his date of birth, this link is perhaps reliable enough for the year, 79 - http://venturebeat.com/2006/12/12/founders-fund-hires-edgy-sean-parker-as-partner-to-launch-second-fund/ - has anyone got something more specific than the year? Off2riorob (talk) 17:33, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]


There seem to be plenty of sources that say December 3rd, 1979. Why isn't it on here?114.143.121.135 (talk) 17:26, 4 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

married

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2334590/First-glimpse-Game-Of-Thrones-style-castle-internet-guru-Sean-Parkers-10m-Big-Sur-wedding.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.184.252.247 (talk) 10:04, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

wedding destruction reports and fine are false, as called out by the California Coastal Commission itself:

http://documents.coastal.ca.gov/reports/2013/6/F5.1-s-6-2013.pdf

http://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2013/06/sean-parker-responds-to-redwoods-wedding-criticism-and-his-defense-is-actually-pretty-convincing/276553/