User talk:Elahrairah: Difference between revisions
Lowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs) m Archiving 2 discussion(s) to User talk:Basalisk/Archive 7) (bot |
Anthony Bradbury (talk | contribs) →Mail: new section |
||
| Line 77: | Line 77: | ||
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | good job [[User:Brabnaba|Brabnaba]] ([[User talk:Brabnaba|talk]]) 22:46, 6 May 2014 (UTC) |
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | good job [[User:Brabnaba|Brabnaba]] ([[User talk:Brabnaba|talk]]) 22:46, 6 May 2014 (UTC) |
||
|} |
|} |
||
== Mail == |
|||
{{ygm}} |
|||
Revision as of 19:59, 14 May 2014
| RfA candidate | S | O | N | S % | Status | Ending (UTC) | Time left | Dups? | Report |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ARandomName123 | 83 | 0 | 0 | 100 | Open | 02:33, 15 March 2026 | 5 days, 1 hour | no | report |
Did you notice
Hi User:Basalisk: While updating the wikipage for "Russia" for the Olympics results, I noticed that one of the supporting pages for "2014 Ladies Olympics figure skating" was page protected due to disruptive editing from User:Heri. On looking closer to send a disruptive editing message to that User:Heri, I then noticed that you had already put that user on notice/probation and offered that user an unblock in good faith. After that previously blocked User:Heri took one day off after your notice, apparently that user returned with another large block of disruptive edits, which caused another User:Kirin several lost hours of edit time to at least start to clean-up the disruptive edits at least half way. Other users have also asked for help against User:Heri. Since you have already put that user on "probation" status, I was not sure what to do next and thought to check with you if you did notice that the disruptive editing started all over again after User:Heri taking one day off following your notification. Below is posted one of the sequences of disruptive edits from After your notice to that user for your review. Could you glance at this.
(cur | prev) 00:26, 25 March 2014 Heri... (talk | contribs) m . . (34,150 bytes) (-1) . . (space removed) (undo | thank)
(cur | prev) 00:24, 25 March 2014 Heri... (talk | contribs) . . (34,151 bytes) (+5) . . (→Controversies) (undo | thank)
(cur | prev) 22:27, 24 March 2014 Heri... (talk | contribs) m . . (34,146 bytes) (+10) . . (→Records) (undo | thank)
(cur | prev) 22:06, 24 March 2014 Heri... (talk | contribs) m . . (34,136 bytes) (+1) . . (→Records) (undo | thank)
(cur | prev) 22:05, 24 March 2014 Heri... (talk | contribs) . . (34,135 bytes) (-10) . . (→Records) (undo | thank)
(cur | prev) 22:02, 24 March 2014 Heri... (talk | contribs) m . . (34,145 bytes) (+58) . . (undo | thank)
(cur | prev) 21:56, 24 March 2014 Heri... (talk | contribs) . . (34,087 bytes) (0) . . (→Official responses) (undo | thank)
(cur | prev) 21:54, 24 March 2014 Heri... (talk | contribs) . . (34,087 bytes) (+1,694) . . (seperated into three sub sections) (undo | thank)
(cur | prev) 21:41, 24 March 2014 Heri... (talk | contribs) . . (32,393 bytes) (+87) . . (undo | thank)
(cur | prev) 21:36, 24 March 2014 Heri... (talk | contribs) . . (32,306 bytes) (-1,103) . . (NYTimes repeats the same result as the official ISU results) (undo | thank)
(cur | prev) 21:34, 24 March 2014 Heri... (talk | contribs) m . . (33,409 bytes) (+12) . . (→Criticism of the results) (undo | thank)
(cur | prev) 21:32, 24 March 2014 Heri... (talk | contribs) . . (33,397 bytes) (+510) . . (Please read talk page for the reason of this recovery) (undo | thank)
FelixRosch (talk) 15:40, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Hi, I notice you reverted my edits made to the above. The additional information is sourced and I am not sure How BLP can apply to the removal of UK or for that matter to the addition of a married name. I have not read cover to cover os to speak BLP but I cannot see how this information can be in violation of biographies of a living person as she is deceased and the information added has a verifiable source. I look forward to hearing your response. All the best Sport and politics (talk) 16:49, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
- I've linked to the relevant guidance on your talk page. BLP applies because the subject was recently a living person. Any information contained in the article is therefore subject to the standards outlined at WP:BLP. Even if BLP did not apply, the sources you used weren't reliable - using totallyjewish.com to verify that she practices Judaism is completely inappropriate. The other two sources you've used are also partisan and only contain quotes from her husband, who is himself Jewish and arguably biased. Consider this a warning - if you add the information a third time, I will block you. Basalisk inspect damage⁄berate 17:05, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
- The information regarding her religion has four sources and three of the sources contain the phrase "Peaches was Jewish" and the title of one is "Peaches Geldof was exploring Jewish roots, bereaved husband says" two of the sources are dated today and two of the sources are dated 2012. I am not entirely sure how this information could be more verified. I also resent our heavy-handedness in immediately threatening to block when there appears to be little reading of the added informations sources and a vague pointing in the direction of "go read this now clear off". I may be wrong but that is the impression you are giving off. The information has multiple reliable verifiable sources and therefor qualifies for inclusion as it is truthful and well sourced. If you can point out how this fails to meet the standards for inclusion please let me know otherwise this is a little bit of ownership behaviour being exhibited by blocking information which qualifies to be added without good reason. Sport and politics (talk) 17:17, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
For convenience purposes i have provided the four website sources: [1] [2] [3] [4]
Sport and politics (talk) 17:21, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
- The sources you've included all quote her Jewish husband as claiming she is Jewish. This is not the same as quoting her saying she is Jewish; he is biased. None of the sources you've used are neutral or reliable. In addition, the sources all quote her husband as saying she is an ethnic Jew, whilst you are trying to add her reliigion as Jewish. WP:V does not mean "find a source containing the words you want and then write whatever you feel like". These are clear BLP violations, do not re-add the information. Basalisk inspect damage⁄berate 17:22, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
ChatApp AfD closure
Hello! It seems that you have stated wrong CSD criterion in closure of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ChatApp: it was deleted per G11, not G8. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk•track) 18:02, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks for that. Trying to do too many things at once. Basalisk inspect damage⁄berate 23:04, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
| The Special Barnstar | |
| good job Brabnaba (talk) 22:46, 6 May 2014 (UTC) |

It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.