Hi there and thanks for your contributions. Just regarding your use of the fc template in this edit, you might not know that this particular template (Template:fc) is designed to be substituted, not transcluded. If we transclude it, we unnecessarily obscure the link targets. Basically, you need to type {{subst:fc|Portsmouth}}, not {{fc|Portsmouth}}. I've fixed that page now, but just a heads up for future edits. Hope this makes sense. Thanks. --Jameboy (talk) 21:54, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for letting me know this but I have two questions regarding what you've said:

1. As the link still worked and there was no visible change, why change it?
   
2. Also, it takes much longer to type what you've said, so when is the 'fc|team' template actually used?
   

From what I've read, transclusion is better than substitution. Apologies if you explained it in the original post but I'm finding it hard to understand why a change is needed. Bestbaggiesfan (talk) 11:30, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, are you being serious? How about you check every other tennis aricle and see how it is done there? Or bring it up at WP Tennis to discuss that. Why do you think there is a tennis3 template? Kante4 (talk) 16:02, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm being perfectly serious, you can't think that 'compact' looks better than the more spread out one? Bestbaggiesfan (talk) 16:05, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. Why do you want to change it? It has been done like this for years now and you want to change it, bring up some arguments why. Maybe not only here but at the project site where i may take this. Kante4 (talk) 16:08, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I understand your point but this is the English version of Wikipedia so surely the templates used should be the ones that are used in all English media? Tennis3 template Bestbaggiesfan (talk) 16:11, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Has nothing to do with english wikipedia. check the other article from the previous years or even this. Makes no sense that you change it without even discussing it at the project site. Kante4 (talk) 16:14, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I was the one who created the article and that's the template I set it to, that's all I'm saying. If you feel that strongly about it then change it back. t least I know now for future reference but I still believe my template is better but if Tennis 3 has always been used then so be it.Bestbaggiesfan (talk) 16:49, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No one owns an article. I change it back because the other one is used since a few years. Kante4 (talk) 16:55, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't say I owned it! I just said that's how I created it.Bestbaggiesfan (talk) 17:05, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Does not change the fact that you used a completely different template than every other creator used so far. Kante4 (talk) 17:06, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Also, why do you keep deleting 'reflist' on the page aand deleting external links too? Bestbaggiesfan (talk) 20:49, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Just saw that, because the draw is the reference and as long as there are no other refs given (who won etc...) there is no need for the reflist. External links are given in the main article. Kante4 (talk) 20:39, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please see WP:COMMONNAME. Until the 50th episode broadcasts, she has appeared as Jenna-Louise in all of her Doctor Who episodes (and all of her other screen appearances, for that matter), and is still better known as such. The name change is mentioned and sourced at Jenna-Louise Coleman, and the new form of her name is used at 50th anniversary special (Doctor Who) and 2013 Christmas special (Doctor Who) as she will be credited as such per sources. The time for changing the other uses, such as at Clara Oswald, will be after the 50th special airs. U-Mos (talk) 17:03, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]