Hello there. Would you mind reviewing/editing the page for Heidi Crebo-Rediker? She is currently a colleague of mine, so I do bring some Wikipedia:CoI, but there remains a factual error and half of the citations currently on her page are from partisan sources like Revolving Door and American Prospect. Another colleague (User:66.44.56.186) and I (User:98.26.34.63) have attempted to correct factual errors and add more information about her professional history, but as good faith as those edits may be, we do carry bias. I want to avoid an edit war with KidAd while honoring Wikipedia's standards of notability and neutrality.

The remaining factual error is that she was not a co-founder of International Capital Strategies. She is, however, the current CEO.

Thank you. --Dkingsmill (talk) 16:04, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Dkingsmill, thanks for your message. Your best option is to avoid editing that article at all, and to propose changes via the talk page using Template:Request edit, which will summon an uninvolved editor. I have added a note about connected contributors to the talk page already, and have corrected the factual error you mentioned, but I've not reviewed the rest of the page. I hope this helps at least! -Kj cheetham (talk) 08:53, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the note you left about what is considered a minor edit. I'm still relatively new at this and figuring things out (like how to use the "talk" pages). I'll make sure I handle this correctly in the future. Just wondering whether there is any way to remove a historical minor edit flag? Or do we just leave what's done stay done?

Thanks again for your help and review of the article. Btipper (talk) 15:58, 19 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Btipper, thanks for your message. Just leave the historical ones, it's just something to bear in mind for the future. Do let me know if there is anything I can do to help or you get stuck with anything though! -Kj cheetham (talk) 16:00, 19 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, RE: User talk:Zakhx150#I have unreviewed a page you curated 2, I'm not sure what's going on here. I'm auto-patrolled, so had I also accidentally clicked on the 'reviewed' tab so it looked like I reviewed my own new page? Any issues with the page specifically? Slightly baffled, but welcoming oversight. Zakhx150 (talk) 10:04, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Zakhx150, I admit I'm not sure what happened there, it wasn't intentional! As you are auto-patrolled, it should have been the case it was automatically marked as reviewed by you. Sorry for any confusion, I'd only meant to add a short description myself. It looks okay to me, so I've marked it as reviewed again. -Kj cheetham (talk) 10:10, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, I'll blame the gremlins in the system. Thanks for the clarification and all your good work. Ta. Zakhx150 (talk) 10:25, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for your welcome greetings and your hints. Best, Qftandsft (talk) 10:03, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Qftandsft. Happy to help. Let me know if you need help with anything in the future. -Kj cheetham (talk) 10:42, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks you for welcoming me to this wonderful platforms, I noticed the article I created Johfrim Art and Design Studio, is yet to be patroll. Looked forward to a positive outcome. Thank you Bernice2019 (talk) 10:03, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Bernice2019, thank you for your message. That article looks okay, I've just done a couple of minor adjustments to it. -Kj cheetham (talk) 10:35, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kj cheethamThank you for the positive feedback and acknowledgement by reviewing it but noticed is not yet patroll so it will be live on Google Search.Thanks in advance. Bernice2019 (talk) 11:03, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Bernice2019, it is patrolled looking at the log - you may need to refresh your browser cache perhaps? -Kj cheetham (talk) 11:06, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Kj cheetham I have seen you have done it, guess is a technical issues why it hasn't come live on Google yet, cos I have use different browsers and gagget to check. Bernice2019 (talk) 11:41, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Bernice2019, Google's indexing is not instant after an article is patrolled. I don't know how long it takes, but you might just need to wait until tomorrow. -Kj cheetham (talk) 11:47, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Seen now.thank you Bernice2019 (talk) 12:00, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Kj cheetham I just noticed a page similar to mine is just been created on article space Kakofoni Group Gallery , is it possible for it to be redirect or merge to Johfrim Art and Design Studio?Bernice2019 (talk) 23:27, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Bernice2019, I don't really deal with merges/duplicated articles, but I suggest you speak to Theroadislong, who is the editor that approved that second article. -Kj cheetham (talk) 08:38, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I got carried away. Such important work. I should have left the article to you as it`s not my thing. Could you check the article on Leonore Tiefer for me? I was up to Bibliography. You`ll probably know a book that is relevant. Thank you for calling a halt. Of course, no connection with the person. I will go back to my specialty, Canadian art.Joan arden murray (talk) 13:47, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Joan arden murray, not to worry, it's very easy to drift into a more promotional style of writing rather than a completely neutral encylopedia style! I've seen other people even drift into using Wikipedia as more of a WP:SOAPBOX before. I'll try and read through Leonore Tiefer myself and make some tweaks this week. Keep up the good work though! -Kj cheetham (talk) 14:20, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks so much! I made a few last minute corrections but I`m leaving the article to you. I will watch with interest at what you do!Joan arden murray (talk) 17:37, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Joan arden murray, For interest, one of the things I check is https://copyvios.toolforge.org/?lang=en&project=wikipedia&title=Leonore_Tiefer&oldid=&action=search&use_engine=1&use_links=1 as it's important to not just use phrases from potentially copyrighted sources as per WP:PARAPHRASE. I also try to remove praising adjectives as per WP:PUFFERY. Ideally would also check for not drawing conclusions by combining multiple sources as per WP:SYNTH and the wider WP:NOR. But in practice I'm doing this in my spare time so it'll just be a fairly quick run-through to remove the more obvious WP:PUFFERY by me! Please do free feel to have a go editing further yourself too, especially on the paraphrasing side. -Kj cheetham (talk) 18:32, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Goodness! What a wonderful tool. I will keep it at hand from now on. My excellent Wikipedia teacher, W.carter in Sweden, never told me but I will save the tool and use it now. Do you happen to know how to get all the references on a subject through cloud? A Wikipedia person told me once and I didn`t realize how handy that would be. Thank you for this!Joan arden murray (talk) 19:07, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Do you mean something like this?:

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

I've been using Wikipedia on and off for about a decade and I'm still learning! -Kj cheetham (talk) 20:25, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your recent edits. I've just gone through that article and done a little bit more trimming. -Kj cheetham (talk) 18:10, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Louis-Pierre Comeau is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Louis-Pierre Comeau until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Eastmain (talk • contribs) 11:36, 6 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I would be most grateful if you would suggest how the article on Jane Setter can be improved so that the BLP tag can be removed. RoachPeter (talk) 16:54, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi RoachPeter. Just glancing at Jane Setter it probably just needs a reference for the Education section, even if it's to a source already used. -Kj cheetham (talk) 17:18, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Please, why have you added the BLP tag to my WP page just now? RoachPeter (talk) 18:47, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Peter Roach (phonetician) article has a similar issue - 3 sections have no references. -Kj cheetham (talk) 09:00, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I see it now RoachPeter (talk) 13:03, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]