The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.‎

The result was merge‎ to India–Russia relations. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:46, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Embassy of Russia, New Delhi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject fails GNG. Efforts to redirect this have failed. Chris Troutman (talk) 04:26, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Yes failed, because you cannot redirect to a page which does not mention the subject. At the very least you have to merge the referenced info into the target page. - Altenmann >talk 04:52, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bilateral relations, India, and Russia. Chris Troutman (talk) 04:27, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 07:19, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Merge to List of ambassadors of Russia to India as WP:NOPAGE, Alternative target India–Russia relations. —siroχo 05:17, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Consensus on a target would be helpful
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star Mississippi 01:59, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:21, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Embassies are generally considered notable enough to warrant their own articles and many such articles exist. Dazzling4 (talk) 03:46, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Dazzling4: I'm not aware of any guideline where embassies are given the presumption of notability, but I could be entirely wrong – could you point me to where this is stated? If this isn't actually a guideline, please note that the existence of other similar articles does not confer notability (see WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS). Tollens (talk) 00:47, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough this is textbook WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS - I change my suggestion to Delete Dazzling4 (talk) 02:28, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: The article contains nontrivial information, reasonably sourced. - Altenmann >talk 04:25, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Merge with India–Russia relations: While not appearing to meet GNG, there's certainly usable material in the article. List of ambassadors of Russia to India seems to me to not be the correct merge target here, as an embassy is not an ambassador. Tollens (talk) 00:50, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge with India–Russia relations as AtD, generally agree with Tollens, I think GNG is iffy here, but I do believe the merge will result in a better target and more exposure of the material. If in the future it improves into a stand alone article, the history will be preserved.  // Timothy :: talk  15:56, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.