Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jovanmilic97 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Konstantin Koshutin and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Jovanmilic97 (talk) 22:54, 22 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, ModernManifestDestiny! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Jovanmilic97 (talk) 22:54, 22 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi ModernManifestDestiny! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of The Left (Germany) several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Talk:The Left (Germany), please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. Robby.is.on (talk) 19:13, 6 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Robby.is.on. I noticed that you made a comment on the page Talk:The Left (Germany) that didn't seem very civil, so it may have been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Labelling another editor's contributions as "low IQ" is not acceptable. Also, "I will assume you are in violation of WP:SOCK until you log in." violates WP:AGF. Robby.is.on (talk) 01:30, 9 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Flat Out was:

Though you have added sources, it still relies heavily on one. You will need further supporting references to support notability of the subject

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:55Zh6U Nebo-U and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Flat Out (talk) 00:50, 23 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contribution(s). However, as a general rule, while user talk pages permit a small degree of generalisation, other talk pages such as Talk:Far-left politics are strictly for discussing improvements to their associated main pages, and many of them have special instructions on the top. They are not a general discussion forum about the article's topic or any other topic. If you have questions or ideas and are not sure where to post them, consider asking at the Teahouse. Thanks. Doug Weller talk 07:57, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Abo Yemen was:

Nothing has changed from the last review

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:55Zh6U Nebo-U and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

𐩣𐩫𐩧𐩨 Abo Yemen (𓃵) 19:52, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Abo Yemen. You are incorrect.

The article has been altered since last review, I have added another source to complement my original main source, which was the original reason for declination. Please re-read it and resubmit the AfC. ModernManifestDestiny (talk) 20:38, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'm happy to give some They won't be criticisms, just things new users don't often know. Doug Weller talk 08:16, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, I have multiple at the moment. MMD † (talk) 16:25, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:RSNP about global.org - actually I'll copy it for you: "GlobalSecurity.org is an unreliable user-contributed and scraper site given to plagiarism. In the 2022 RfC, a slight majority of editors held that globalsecurity.org should be regarded as generally unreliable, with a significant minority arguing for deprecation. The site should not be used to back factual claims on Wikipedia. GlobalSecurity.org should not be confused with globalresearch.ca"

So it can't be used. Minor issue, you copied some word for word from it, which is a copyright violation. No worries about either, but you will need to fix them before resubmitting your draft. I'm asking all AfC reviewers to add a script which marks unreliable sources in articles. Doug Weller talk 16:51, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I had no idea actually. I will remove it as a source. MMD † (talk) 17:05, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Where did I copy it word for word? I can't find it, I feel like I'm looking for a needle in a haystack. MMD † (talk) 17:09, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

See [1] Doug Weller talk 17:43, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. MMD † (talk) 18:20, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It should be a bit better, but tell me if I missed anything. MMD † (talk) 18:31, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Bluethricecreamman were:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

please address issues from previous reviewers

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:55Zh6U Nebo-U and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Bluethricecreamman (talk) 01:37, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by BuySomeApples were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Konstantin Koshutin and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

BuySomeApples (talk) 00:54, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It's very strange to stick my name in your edit summary for your "disputed inline" tag on information that I was not actually responsible for originally including. Please leave my name out of your random edits in the future. Simonm223 (talk) 20:42, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You were the one who removed the discussion note, so yes it was directed at you? It is not "random", and I'm sure you know that, calling it random does not help your case. MMD † (talk) 19:17, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Are you talking about [2] this edit from March? Because I really had to dig to figure out what the heck you even meant. And if this is the case then I'd suggest you read WP:POINT because calling on me specifically in an edit summary more than a month later is honestly slightly concerning. Simonm223 (talk) 19:24, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Regardless of how old it is (that is, barely a month and a half old), it is perfectly acceptable to revert an edit that I disagree with, are you saying it is not? MMD † (talk) 19:29, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

What I'm saying I would like you to not do is to mention me by name in edit summaries, especially when it is not immediately apparent what they're in reference to. You manually undid my revert of a third editor's edit from a month and a half previous. My immediate reaction to this was complete befuddlement why you would even mention me since I honestly didn't even remember that specific revert. I edit a lot of pages on Wikipedia and a reversion of a drive-by tagging from over a month ago is not something that I am likely to remember. You will note a fourth editor promptly reverted your edit. This isn't a Simon vs. you situation. This is just a (very minor) content dispute in a CTOP. In the future please keep your edit summaries focused on content and not on editors Simonm223 (talk) 19:35, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think I need a wiki-lesson from you, I see 0 rules that say I am not allowed to point out a person by name if I believe they are causing an issue. MMD † (talk) 19:43, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Just start following WP:CIV. Please feel no need to respond. I've said my piece and will not comment again on this thread. Simonm223 (talk) 19:49, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Simon my talk page is for real issues, not upset editors who don't want their name stamped on their own edits. There is nothing uncivil about mentioning your name concerning your edits, throwing the entire civility policy page at me is both not helpful and makes you look silly. Unless you find an actual specific rule, consider your complaints ignored.

Also, it seems odd that you seem happy to start a conversation, but are quick to end it. If you want to discuss, you need to allow time to discuss, otherwise don't start said discussion. MMD † (talk) 20:07, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, ModernManifestDestiny. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:55Zh6U Nebo-U, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:07, 9 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, ModernManifestDestiny. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Konstantin Koshutin, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:11, 18 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, ModernManifestDestiny. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "55Zh6U Nebo-U".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:43, 9 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, ModernManifestDestiny. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Konstantin Koshutin".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:53, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]