I have summaried the conclusion of the conversations about disruptive edits and Historic Counties of England. Thanks for you help with this. Should the edits continue, I think we have discussed the issue enough and can move to Dispute Resolution. It is worth noting that the historic_county tag has been removed from place info boxes. Anyhoo. Great working with you! Jonnyspeed20 (talk) 16:05, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Jonnyspeed20. I confess to feeling a little uncertain of what edits I can make without appearing to be provocative. The article Plaistow, Newham states in the lead, "It is in the historic county of Essex, and was originally a ward in the parish of West Ham, hundred of Beacontree. The town forms the majority of the London E13 postcode district." Adhering as far as possible to the original and umpteen times agreed wording, I would seek to change this to, "It was originally a ward in the parish of West Ham, hundred of Beacontree, and part of the historic county of Essex. The town now forms the majority of the London E13 postcode district." Would I be wrong to make such a change? LenF54 (talk) 16:47, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Be bold, do it. Seems right to me... and better than the current wording. I think so long as the phrase "historic county of Essex" is maintained, it will be good Jonnyspeed20 (talk) Jonnyspeed20 (talk) 17:02, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Len, for your work on the Newham page. Appreciate it.

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tottenham Hotspur F.C. Under-23s and Academy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chris McGrath.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Rectified 09/04/22. LenF54 (talk) 15:52, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Len! Sorry I missed the message you left on my talk page a while ago. Not been too active on Wikipedia lately! PlatinumClipper96 (talk) 18:11, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi LenF54! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. SuperMarioMan (Talk) 21:05, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Acknowledged. I regarded adding two sentences to a lengthy article as minor, without considering the content. Thanks for your comments. I now see that several of my edits should not have been marked as minor, and I will be more careful. Cheers. LenF54 (talk) 15:28, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Nuno Santos (footballer, born 1973), you may be blocked from editing. GiantSnowman 10:30, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I am surprised you describe it as vandalism. It was a stupid error, confusing the two Nuno's - both of whom I believe were goalkeepers in their playing career. I am sorry but errors do happen. LenF54 (talk) 17:12, 2 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Robert Humphrey Marten, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Ca ^{talk to me!} 01:03, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You may also want to point people to Henry Percy if this [1], happens again. Regards. Govvy (talk) 20:55, 7 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:34, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of DTT channels in the United Kingdom is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of DTT channels in the United Kingdom until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

^Tattooed_Leprechaun｜^🗣️💬 14:13, 31 December 2025 (UTC) LenF54 (talk) 15:23, 31 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]