Hello, KenL2001, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Nardog (talk) 17:09, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I have a question about List of Japanese films of 2021. For the films listed under TBA, are any of them scheduled to release in 2021? BOVINEBOY2008 17:08, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Japanese films of 2021, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Haruka Kudō. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:17, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, KenL2001. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:List of Japanese films of 2022, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:04, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:58, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. In one of your recent edits, you added links to an article which did not add content or meaning, or repeated the same link several times throughout the article. Please see Wikipedia's guideline on links to avoid overlinking. Kindly read WP:NOTBROKEN and/or MOS:NOPIPE since you used the target links Girls und Panzer das Finale and Princess Principal: Crown Handler for the second time instead of their redirect links Girls und Panzer das Finale: Part 4 and Princess Principal: Crown Handler – Chapter 3 since both fit well to the topic they are under (List of Japanese films of 2023, both films are set for 2023 release). Thank you. Centcom08 (talk) 00:26, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:58, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Innovation Party (Norway) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 January 11 § Innovation Party (Norway) until a consensus is reached. Beland (talk) 19:58, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Trillion Game, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Xexerss (talk) 15:27, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Concerns and controversies at the 2024 Summer Olympics has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for information on how to contribute your work appropriately. For legal reasons, Wikipedia strictly cannot host copyrighted text or images from print media or digital platforms without an appropriate and verifiable license. Contributions infringing on copyright will be removed. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 22:44, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks!  Bait30  ^{Talk 2 me pls?} 08:03, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Concerns and controversies at the 2024 Summer Olympics has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for information on how to contribute your work appropriately. For legal reasons, Wikipedia strictly cannot host copyrighted text or images from print media or digital platforms without an appropriate and verifiable license. Contributions infringing on copyright will be removed. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. Kingsif (talk) 01:33, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks!

• Please do not replace sources, especially those used multiple times, without explanation and without apprising the content being sourced. In general, please start using edit summaries, as many of your edits are confusing at best. Kingsif (talk) 03:14, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited TBS Television (Japan), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Adventures of Superman.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:03, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:45, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Japanese films of 2026 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Japanese films of 2026 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Royiswariii Talk! 10:42, 13 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi KenL2001. Thank you for your work on 2024 South Korean Christmas coup attempt. Another editor, MPGuy2824, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

the word 'Christmas' isn't mentioned in the target page

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|MPGuy2824}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 09:26, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. The correct plural of aircraft is also aircraft. Hope this helps, best wishes, DBaK (talk) 19:23, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect 2024 South Korean Christmas coup attempt has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 December 25 § 2024 South Korean Christmas coup attempt until a consensus is reached. Rusalkii (talk) 04:31, 25 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Expo 2025, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cartier.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:54, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that one or more recent edit(s) you made did not have an edit summary. You can use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit, or to provide a description of what the edit changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits, an adequate summary may be quite brief.

The edit summary field looks like this:

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. With a Wikipedia account, you can give yourself a reminder by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary (or the default undo summary), and then click the "Save" button. Thanks! Flibirigit (talk) 12:46, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jordan Bardella, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page La Croix.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:56, 23 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Lycoris Recoil. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Xexerss (talk) 04:11, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page 2025 Cannes Film Festival, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. ( | )

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can . Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 10:15, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The article List of Uma Musume Pretty Derby characters has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NLIST. Only sourced information is casting info, with most "sources" being Twitter or blogs; there are no demonstrated notability and significant coverage of list entries.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MimirIsSmart (talk) 02:43, 30 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Masahiro Nakai v. Fuji TV has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 June 5 § Masahiro Nakai v. Fuji TV until a consensus is reached. Rusalkii (talk) 21:14, 5 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Uma Musume Pretty Derby characters is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Uma Musume Pretty Derby characters until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Go D. Usopp (talk) 15:04, 6 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

When you edited the 2026 Asian Games page, I noticed you added Deloitte to the sponsor list (despite it being hidden outside of the editor), though I've heard nothing about Deloitte being a sponsor. If this is true, can you provide proof to me? Josh0108 (alt) (talk) 15:05, 14 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed that you inserted several references to the "HPEO Games" into the titles of cited sources in various articles. For instance, at 2032 Summer Olympics, you changed the headline "Brisbane delays its programme to 2026" to read "Brisbane delays its programme to 2026, while SingaMel 2030 HPEO Games plan looms". Unless I'm missing something, there is no such thing as the HPEO Games, and even if there is, none of these articles say anything about it. I have removed all of these references and corrected the titles as they appear on the article in question. Consider this an official warning not to vandalize Wikipedia in this way. If you continue to do this, you may be banned from the site by an administrator. If you want to write about your own fictional events, you can create your own wiki somewhere else. -Reschultzed (talk) 23:19, 17 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! Marcus Markup (talk) 10:49, 18 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Not using edit summaries is disrespectful to other editors. Marcus Markup (talk) 10:49, 18 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi KenL2001, leaving edit summaries such as these ([1], [2]) is not helpful to editors trying to ascertain the intent of your edits. Please leave more descriptive edit summaries that more clearly explain your edits. Additionally, please consider the guidelines laid out at WP:HUMOR; making jokes irresponsibly and/or in inappropriate areas of the encyclopedia without clearly disclosing your intentions is potentially confusing and disruptive to other editors. Thank you. silviaASH (inquire within) 08:55, 25 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to 2026 Winter Olympics has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for information on how to contribute your work appropriately. For legal reasons, Wikipedia strictly cannot host copyrighted text or images from print media or digital platforms without an appropriate and verifiable license. Contributions infringing on copyright will be removed. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. The4lines |||| (talk) 16:11, 15 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The edit summary field is there for you to explain what edits you are making, not for commentary on the subject of the article. Please use it correctly so that other editors know what you are doing. Continuous misuse of the edit summary field is considered disruptive and could lead to a block. ... discospinster _talk 03:19, 24 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Gachiakuta. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Xexerss (talk) 05:21, 4 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

1) There is no need to add more than one source for basic information, such as voice actors. Do not add sources just to increase the number of Japanese sources in the article. No guidelines mention anything about this.

2) Natalie links have not been archived correctly on Wayback Machine since the end of April, so do not change the ones archived on archive.today.

3) Do not add categories related to unreferenced/unverifiable content in the article. Read WP:CATV. Xexerss (talk) 05:26, 4 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:46, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Gonna be pinging Solaire the knight for this also since they're the original person who brought up the concern, but we gotta find a way to polish the reception section of Umamusume: Pretty Derby in a way that is neutral and relevant to Umamusume without the article going too encyclopedic. I appreciate the efforts you made to cite the relevant articles, but there are instances where it feels more fitting for the information presented to be in its respective wikipage, like much of Haru Urara's info which I suggested prior to be moved to her wikipage. JT0219 (talk) 02:17, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If there's enough information, I wouldn't mind creating separate "popularity" or "repection" articles. Of course, I'd leave sections with general information within the main article. The main problem now is that many sections are endlessly filled in an attempt to describe everything at once. Solaire the knight (talk) 02:22, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I've begun removing some of the sentences I feel don't serve substantial purpose and relevance in the article and only serve to bloat it. If you are reading this, please acknowledge and assist in any way you can in adding more substantial and relevant info. JT0219 (talk) 23:54, 21 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2026 Asian Games, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CBC.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:52, 15 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Sanae Takaichi, you may be blocked from editing. Hi. I thought about leaving you a note but your talk page is full of relevant warnings you never responded to. You've been urged repeatedly to explain your edits; this silliness in no way explain why you imposed a US-English guide on the article. I reverted your edit. Moreover, please leave the dates in those editorial notes alone: your "updating" is not doing anything useful, and in fact it makes matters more confusing and less clear. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 15:57, 5 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]