This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Articles for creation This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC This article was accepted from this draft on 17 April 2025 by reviewer Ldm1954 (talk · contribs). Women scientists Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women scientists, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in science on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women scientistsWikipedia:WikiProject Women scientistsTemplate:WikiProject Women scientistsWomen scientists Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Chemistry Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chemistry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of chemistry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChemistryWikipedia:WikiProject ChemistryTemplate:WikiProject ChemistryChemistry Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Biography: Science and Academia This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: With her two ACS awards she qualifies under WP:NPROF#C2 and perhaps also C7. The draft should probably have been accepted earlier. Please add a scientist Infobox.

Ldm1954 (talk) 02:50, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Name of latest editor is the same as that of the page, so is probably her Ldm1954 (talk) 15:36, 30 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The two following pieces of text are examples of lazy writing and use of references:

• In 2013, Sheila DeWitt was featured in the C&E News cover story, "Female Entrepreneurs: Facing challenges beyond science and business."
• DeWitt is featured in Famous Organic Chemists by the American Chemical Society. In 2025, DeWitt was awarded two awards by the American Chemical Society: the Kathryn C. Hach Award for Entrepreneurial Success and the Gertrude Elion Medicinal Chemistry Award

What interests Wikipedia is not "that DeWitt was so featured". What is needed is what was said about DeWitt in reliable sources. It is of marginal interest that DeWitt was featured, but what was said I the features is of substantial interest 🇵🇸‍🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦‍🇵🇸 21:04, 20 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Further:

• Biotechnology Innovation Organization (BIO) announced Sheila DeWitt as the 2012 Buzz of BIO winner at the corresponding BIO International Convention.

If this award is in and of itself notable it ought to appear in Biotechnology Innovation Organization. If it is not notable then this line is puffery. 🇵🇸‍🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦‍🇵🇸 21:11, 20 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]