@Lamp21, I'm glad you are creating articles on Thai culture. I believe English Wikipedia needs this and, personally, I welcome it. That's why I'm sad that proper credit is not given to the original Thai articles when content is copied from them. This breaks U.S. law. That means the articles either need to be credited the way my posts above describe or they will need to be deleted. Even if you copy content into the draft space, proper credit must be given. That content is saved in the draft history and the copyright of the authors needs to be respected, just like we need to respect your copyright. So please go back to these articles and take the steps to follow the law and save your articles.

Oona Wikiwalker (talk) 21:12, 18 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Lamp21 great job crediting Phra Setthi Navagotta on its talk page! You are going to save your articles. YES!

Most people put the credit also in the edit summary immediately when they translate. If they forget (like I do), they make a dummy edit. They go into edit on the article and they just hit the space bar (I do it at the end of a heading or a paragraph). That space lets them make and edit summary. That's where they put "NOTE: Content in the edit of (take the timestamp of the version you translated FROM) was translated from the existing Thai Wikipedia article at th:Exact name of Thai article; see its history for attribution."

Something different goes in the Talk page. You can see it at Talk:Esther_Peter-Davis. If you go into the source code you can see how it's done. To get the numbers you see there, go into the history of any page. Click on any version. Look at the page address. The numbers at the end are what you want. We call that the "oldid." In the template at Esther Peter-Davis, "version" is the number of the version you translated FROM. "insertversion" is the number of the page you translated INTO and after you finish your edit, complete with edit summary, you get it from the page history.

I know this seems complicated at first. But you clearly are very intelligent; you have the capacity for this. You're going to make Wikipedia better and preserve Thai culture in a scary time. YES!

You can ping me by typing the @ character and picking my name. Please do that if you need help with this and I'll try my best. Oona Wikiwalker (talk) 22:27, 18 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Phra Somdet Wat Rakhang. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and it has too many problems of language or grammar. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 14:13, 30 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there Lamp21: You need to look at references for Alubomulle Sumanasara Thero what you copied from the JApanese article where there are "ref name=" multiple references, as what you have copied does not have the primary, expanded reference information. I don't have the skills to work this out properly because of the language issue with jp:アルボムッレ・スマナサーラ. Matilda Maniac (talk) 22:52, 7 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

thank you, I will try to fix this Lamp21 (talk) 23:37, 7 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Lamp21, please consider reading this Wikipedia:Large_language_models essay before starting another "expansion of the topic". It's not that we have to avoid LLMs "at all costs"; it's more about using them with skillful means. Some of your edits are indeed good, which I also find useful, but some are not as good. Sometimes, the articles from Thai Wiki, Myanmar Wiki, etc., have no sources; in other cases, the formatting is quite different from the English Wikipedia. Please also notice that tags like Template:AI-generated are now being added by other editors to many of the Wiki articles that you have edited. Thank you. Sappadasa (talk) 07:50, 25 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please also notice that the calendar used in Myanmar (Myanmar Era) and Thailand (Thai calendar) differ from the English common era. Sappadasa (talk) 09:03, 26 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Lamp21—I agree with Sappadasa, and really think you need to slow down. You are clearly not taking the proper time to review the edits that you've made using LLMs. To be very clear—this is disruptive editing. Can you take some time to acknowledge some of the concerns that others have raised on this talk page? Perryprog (talk) 17:36, 27 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, I'll try to avoid this and try to do a better job of reviewing edits so that the quality is to a higher standard and less frequent. Lamp21 (talk) 17:39, 27 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Alubomulle Sumanasara Thero. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because this seems to be a minimally reviewed LLM translation. There are currently far too many primary sources (removing § Books will help with this—an indiscriminate listing of his books isn't necessary), as well as a number of references that just don't work, such as some that are links to anchors that don't exist, and notes that you never defined. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Perryprog (talk) 17:33, 27 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Lamp21. Thank you for your work on Luang Pu Rod Phrommasaro. Another editor, Mariamnei, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for your work on this article. Please add more sources and footnotes, as well as establish WP:Note. Thanks and have a great day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Mariamnei}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Mariamnei (talk) 10:33, 3 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Lamp21. Thank you for your work on Luang Pu Iam Pathomnam. Another editor, Mariamnei, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for your work on this article. Please add more sources and footnotes to back up each claim. Please also establish WP:Note. Thanks and have a great day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Mariamnei}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Mariamnei (talk) 12:08, 3 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Lamp21. Thank you for your work on Wat Tam Doi Ton. Another editor, Rosiestep, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Hello. Please translate into English the titles for those references that are in a foreign language (use

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Rosiestep}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Rosiestep (talk) 22:44, 6 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

thank you, I have edited this. Lamp21 (talk) 22:54, 6 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Lamp21. Thank you for your work on Nestorian Hymn of the Holy Trinity. Another editor, Ingratis, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thanks for this article. To improve it, could you provide (a) a source for the English translation; and (b) a more specific link to the relevant location in Wikisource? Best wishes

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Ingratis}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Ingratis (talk) 10:00, 14 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The page Koragajja has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section R2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it was a redirect from the article namespace to a different namespace except the Category, Template, Wikipedia, Help, or Portal namespaces.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion review. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:29, 21 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Kyar Ni Kan Sayadaw, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Htanaungg (talk) 09:37, 25 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Mopyar Gaing, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Htanaungg (talk) 09:56, 25 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The page Khao san sek has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G15 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it exhibited one or more of the following signs which indicated that the page could only plausibly have been generated by large language models (an "AI chatbot" or other application using such technology) and would have been removed by any reasonable human review:

• Communication intended for the user: This may include collaborative communication (e.g., "Here is your Wikipedia article on..."), knowledge-cutoff disclaimers (e.g., "Up to my last training update ..."), self-insertion (e.g., "as a large language model"), and phrasal templates (e.g., "Smith was born on [Birth Date].")
• Implausible non-existent references: This may include external links that are dead on arrival, ISBNs with invalid checksums, and unresolvable DOIs. Since humans can make typos and links may suffer from link rot, a single example should not be considered definitive. Editors should use additional methods to verify whether a reference truly does not exist.
• Nonsensical citations: This may include citations of incorrect temporality (e.g a source from 2020 being cited for a 2022 event), DOIs that resolve to completely unrelated content (e.g., a paper on a beetle species being cited for a computer science article), and citations that attribute the wrong author or publication.

Text produced by these applications can be unsuitable for an encyclopedia, and output must be carefully checked. Pages created using them that did not undergo human review may be deleted at any time.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think these signs were incorrectly identified and you assert that you did carefully check the content, you may contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion review. Additionally – if you would like to create an article but find creating new encyclopedia content yourself difficult, please share this with other editors at the Teahouse, and they may be able to help. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your legitimate contributions. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 00:38, 2 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Nirat Tha Din Daeng, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Htanaungg (talk) 10:45, 4 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Thai occult has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. PARAKANYAA (talk) 02:39, 6 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved.PARAKANYAA (talk) 03:16, 6 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I realize now that I had made severe mistakes in my judgement in editing too fast and too often. I wanted to expand the information on Buddhism and Thai culture because I felt that the information on English wikipedia was too limited. Lamp21 (talk) 04:07, 6 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you use LLMs? PARAKANYAA (talk) 04:12, 6 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I wanted to be able to work on as many articles as possible in the shortest amount of time due to time constraints in my personal life. To this end I incorporated LLMs into the writing because I felt it would be efficient while trying to go over the translations with fluent speakers of Japanese and Thai. I am willing to accept the consequences of my actions. Lamp21 (talk) 04:23, 6 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

That was not a good decision. A lot of the material you added was not supported by reliable sources and was made up by the LLM. These edits were seriously disruptive and will have to be cleaned up.

While I understand your desire for enwiki to have more material on Thai subjects, as our coverage is limited, contributing material that you aren't sure is accurate and sourced to reliable sources is worse than not having anything, as it can mislead and lead to more inaccurate information. There are English sources on Thai and Japanese subjects, so if you don't understand those languages you could write about Thai and Japanese subjects based on English-language sources about them. Or whatever your language proficiency is.

If you would like to contribute again, I would advise you to accept your indef block, reflect on what you should have done during those several months, why your edits were disruptive, and read the WP:Standard offer. You then may be able to appeal several months from now if you convince others that you will not repeat this behavior, and then act like it. Do not use LLMs like this again. But do you see the reason this approach was a problem? PARAKANYAA (talk) 04:44, 6 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I see the reason why this was a problem. I intend to reflect on this for a year and not make use of LLMs in such a manner ever again.

I realize that this would cause problems for people whose job it is to clean up references and ensure informational reliability. Lamp21 (talk) 04:54, 6 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I think blocking indefinitely is too much for the user in question. He was improving and expanding the articles, not vandalizing. နေနီဝန်း (talk) 09:21, 8 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Star Mississippi 03:57, 6 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

(Non-administrator comment) Hi Lamp21, hopefully it's already obvious but please don't use AI/LLM/Chatbots to write an appeal (if you choose to appeal). AI-written appeals will be immediately declined - see WP:NICETRY. Blue Sonnet (talk) 13:03, 6 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Wat Sung Men. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it consists of machine-generated text. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. aesurias (talk) 12:54, 6 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Naga ordination, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sima.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:56, 11 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Wat Inpaeng. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it consists of machine-generated text. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. AlphaBetaGamma (Talk/report any mistakes here) 00:39, 12 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Leshan Temple. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it consists of machine-generated text. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. AlphaBetaGamma (Talk/report any mistakes here) 00:39, 12 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Maha ud requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, as it exhibits signs of having been generated by an AI model with no clear human review. Text produced by these applications can be unsuitable for an encyclopedia and output must be carefully checked. For further information, see the section G15 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think these signs were incorrectly identified and you assert that you did carefully check the content, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Additionally – if you would like to create an article but find it difficult, please ask for help at the Teahouse. AlphaBetaGamma (Talk/report any mistakes here) 00:44, 12 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Phra Kring. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it consists of machine-generated text. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. AlphaBetaGamma (Talk/report any mistakes here) 00:46, 12 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Phra Setthi Navagotta. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it is a poor translation and it consists of machine-generated text. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. AlphaBetaGamma (Talk/report any mistakes here) 00:48, 12 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Ngang requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, as it exhibits signs of having been generated by an AI model with no clear human review. Text produced by these applications can be unsuitable for an encyclopedia and output must be carefully checked. For further information, see the section G15 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think these signs were incorrectly identified and you assert that you did carefully check the content, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Additionally – if you would like to create an article but find it difficult, please ask for help at the Teahouse. AlphaBetaGamma (Talk/report any mistakes here) 00:50, 12 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Sihuhata requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, as it exhibits signs of having been generated by an AI model with no clear human review. Text produced by these applications can be unsuitable for an encyclopedia and output must be carefully checked. For further information, see the section G15 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think these signs were incorrectly identified and you assert that you did carefully check the content, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Additionally – if you would like to create an article but find it difficult, please ask for help at the Teahouse. AlphaBetaGamma (Talk/report any mistakes here) 00:54, 12 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Kwai Tanu requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, as it exhibits signs of having been generated by an AI model with no clear human review. Text produced by these applications can be unsuitable for an encyclopedia and output must be carefully checked. For further information, see the section G15 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think these signs were incorrectly identified and you assert that you did carefully check the content, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Additionally – if you would like to create an article but find it difficult, please ask for help at the Teahouse. AlphaBetaGamma (Talk/report any mistakes here) 01:01, 12 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Thai Brahmajati manual. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. AlphaBetaGamma (Talk/report any mistakes here) 01:03, 12 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Lilit Taleng Phai. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. AlphaBetaGamma (Talk/report any mistakes here) 01:05, 12 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Luang Pho Pui Punyasiri. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it consists of machine-generated text. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. AlphaBetaGamma (Talk/report any mistakes here) 01:08, 12 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Luang Pu Aem Wat Khlong Pong. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and it consists of machine-generated text. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. AlphaBetaGamma (Talk/report any mistakes here) 01:52, 12 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Hor Phra Ghandharat requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, as it exhibits signs of having been generated by an AI model with no clear human review. Text produced by these applications can be unsuitable for an encyclopedia and output must be carefully checked. For further information, see the section G15 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think these signs were incorrectly identified and you assert that you did carefully check the content, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Additionally – if you would like to create an article but find it difficult, please ask for help at the Teahouse. AlphaBetaGamma (Talk/report any mistakes here) 03:57, 12 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Luang Pho Ia Kittiko. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. AlphaBetaGamma (Talk/report any mistakes here) 03:58, 12 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Dangganjiju. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and it is a poor translation. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. AlphaBetaGamma (Talk/report any mistakes here) 04:01, 12 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Luang Phor Nhong Indasuvanno requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, as it exhibits signs of having been generated by an AI model with no clear human review. Text produced by these applications can be unsuitable for an encyclopedia and output must be carefully checked. For further information, see the section G15 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think these signs were incorrectly identified and you assert that you did carefully check the content, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Additionally – if you would like to create an article but find it difficult, please ask for help at the Teahouse. AlphaBetaGamma (Talk/report any mistakes here) 04:02, 12 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Khruba Unruean Sopho. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it consists of machine-generated text. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. AlphaBetaGamma (Talk/report any mistakes here) 05:38, 12 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Sidatsangarā requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, as it exhibits signs of having been generated by an AI model with no clear human review. Text produced by these applications can be unsuitable for an encyclopedia and output must be carefully checked. For further information, see the section G15 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think these signs were incorrectly identified and you assert that you did carefully check the content, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Additionally – if you would like to create an article but find it difficult, please ask for help at the Teahouse. AlphaBetaGamma (Talk/report any mistakes here) 05:44, 12 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Phra Somdet Jitlada. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it is a poor translation and it consists of machine-generated text. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. AlphaBetaGamma (Talk/report any mistakes here) 05:46, 12 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Wat Sing Sathit. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability, it is a poor translation and it consists of machine-generated text. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. AlphaBetaGamma (Talk/report any mistakes here) 06:07, 12 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Shenchen Luga requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, as it exhibits signs of having been generated by an AI model with no clear human review. Text produced by these applications can be unsuitable for an encyclopedia and output must be carefully checked. For further information, see the section G15 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think these signs were incorrectly identified and you assert that you did carefully check the content, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Additionally – if you would like to create an article but find it difficult, please ask for help at the Teahouse. AlphaBetaGamma (Talk/report any mistakes here) 06:11, 12 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Pathomang powder. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it consists of machine-generated text. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Zygmeyer (talk) 06:22, 12 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Phuttha Rangsi Thrisdi Yan. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it consists of machine-generated text. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Zygmeyer (talk) 06:27, 12 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Water Chenla. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it consists of machine-generated text. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Zygmeyer (talk) 06:30, 12 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Luang Phor Guay Chutinataro. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it consists of machine-generated text. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Zygmeyer (talk) 06:34, 12 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Kruba Ajahn. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it consists of machine-generated text. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. --Gurkubondinn (talk) 17:46, 12 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Danggan. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. AlphaBetaGamma (Talk/report any mistakes here) 03:32, 13 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The article Itthaje powder has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Subject does not meet WP:N. Article is based on a single source of unclear provenance (potentially self-published) which could not be found.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion based on established criteria.

If the proposed deletion has already been carried out, you may request undeletion of the article at any time. -- Reconrabbit 17:06, 16 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Japan Theravada Buddhist Association is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Japan Theravada Buddhist Association (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

PARAKANYAA (talk) 00:30, 17 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Luang Phor Bai Thammachoto, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 18:51, 1 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Luang Phor Phrom Thawaro, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 18:52, 1 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Luang Phor Klan Thammachoti, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 21:18, 1 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Luang Phor Choen Punyasiri, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 21:19, 1 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Luang Pho Sunthon Chandathero, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 21:20, 1 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Luang Phor Niam Thammachoti, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 21:20, 1 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Luang Phor Kaew Phrommasaro, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 21:21, 1 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Luang Phor Jad Khankhasaro, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 21:27, 1 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Ariyavangsagatayana (Pae Tissadeva), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 21:27, 1 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Somdet Daeng Silawaddhano, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 21:28, 1 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Wat Khao Samphot, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 21:31, 1 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Wat Pradu Songtham, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 22:06, 1 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Phra Phim amulet, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 22:12, 1 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, The Chart of the Dharmaguptaka Vinaya Bhikkhu Precepts, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 22:13, 1 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Wat Luang Phor Sodh Dhammakayaram, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 22:14, 1 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Ākāravattāra Sutta, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 22:15, 1 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Luang Boribal Buribhand, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 22:16, 1 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Nanshan Vinaya, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 22:18, 1 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Jinamahanidana, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 22:19, 1 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Pathamasambodhi, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 22:19, 1 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Wat Nong Pho Nakhon Sawan, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 22:20, 1 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Flying Road Pagoda, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 22:31, 1 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Phra That Phanom Chronicle, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 22:32, 1 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Luang Phor Kring Hamso, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 22:36, 1 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Land Chenla. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Mccapra (talk) 09:22, 2 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Luang Pu Plong Uttaro. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Mccapra (talk) 09:23, 2 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Saṃyukta Āgama. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Mccapra (talk) 09:24, 2 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Dhajagga Sutta. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Mccapra (talk) 09:25, 2 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Wat Tha Khanun. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Mccapra (talk) 09:26, 2 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Luang Phor Plai Chandasaro. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Mccapra (talk) 09:27, 2 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Shaku Kōnen. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Mccapra (talk) 18:13, 3 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Shakuson Shōfūkai. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Mccapra (talk) 18:16, 3 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Maha Khananam Tinrien. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Mccapra (talk) 23:36, 3 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Supreme Patriarch of the Annam Nikaya. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Mccapra (talk) 23:37, 3 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Annam Nikaya of Thailand. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Mccapra (talk) 23:37, 3 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Maha Khananam Thianthuek. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Mccapra (talk) 23:39, 3 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Maha Khananam Kinchiew. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Mccapra (talk) 23:40, 3 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Maha Khanacharn Yen Yi. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Mccapra (talk) 23:41, 3 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Supreme Patriarch of the Thai Chinese Sangha. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Mccapra (talk) 23:42, 3 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Pakaranavisesa. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Mccapra (talk) 23:44, 3 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Nettivibhavini. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Mccapra (talk) 23:45, 3 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Jinalankara. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Mccapra (talk) 23:46, 3 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Phra Sirimangkalajarn. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Mccapra (talk) 10:53, 4 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Atthayoja. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Mccapra (talk) 10:53, 4 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Anuṭīkā. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Mccapra (talk) 10:54, 4 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Sammohavinodani. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Mccapra (talk) 10:55, 4 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Paramatthajotikā. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Mccapra (talk) 10:55, 4 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Dhammapadaṭṭhakathā. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Mccapra (talk) 10:56, 4 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Papañcasūdanī. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Mccapra (talk) 11:02, 4 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Kanni Shwethintawya Sayadaw. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Mccapra (talk) 19:05, 4 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Sumeru Throne. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Mccapra (talk) 19:24, 4 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Chao Luang Kham Daeng. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Mccapra (talk) 19:29, 4 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Gini Paritta. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Mccapra (talk) 19:29, 4 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Luang Phor Rung Tissaro. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Mccapra (talk) 19:37, 4 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Wat Tam Doi Ton. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Mccapra (talk) 19:38, 4 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Khongkraphan. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Mccapra (talk) 19:39, 4 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Luang Pu Phat Thitipañño. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Mccapra (talk) 19:46, 4 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Pho Than Khiao Kittikuṇo. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Mccapra (talk) 19:47, 4 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Wat Khao Or. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Mccapra (talk) 19:48, 4 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Paramatthadīpanī. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Mccapra (talk) 22:22, 13 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Puggalapaññatti Aṭṭhakathā. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Mccapra (talk) 22:22, 13 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Madhuratthavilasini. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Mccapra (talk) 22:23, 13 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Manorathapūraṇī. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Mccapra (talk) 22:24, 13 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Padasaṅgaha. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Mccapra (talk) 22:24, 13 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ajahn Punnadhammo is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ajahn Punnadhammo until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Ravensfire (talk) 14:27, 15 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Dhammakāyānussati-kathā. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Mccapra (talk) 23:41, 20 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Lao Chakkaraj. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Mccapra (talk) 23:45, 20 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Phra Thongkham Kambhiro. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Mccapra (talk) 23:46, 20 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Mae Yua Phra Phi. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Mccapra (talk) 23:47, 20 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Muean Sumitto. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Mccapra (talk) 23:48, 20 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Luang Pu Suwat Chantasuwanno. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Mccapra (talk) 23:48, 20 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]