The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Keep * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 01:22, 6 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Anti-Muslim propaganda on FacebookAnti-Muslim propaganda on Facebook → Facebook#Anti-Muslim propaganda and Hindu nationalism in India  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

closing and immediately reopening, as the redirect is semi-protected. nominated here by an ip with the rationale being "more accurate", with the proposed targets (so rusalkii assumes, at least) being belief bias and islamophobia (baked into the nomination for some reason) and accompanied by pings of users luizpuodzius and xavier1824 (the latter of whom has been inactive for almost half a year and has 39 edits as of writing this). if someone can make sense of this, i welcome your attempt consarn _{(prison phone) (crime record)} 11:13, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• until then, keep, as that's a good part of the title of the section it targets to (just missing "and hindu nationalism"), and the other proposed targets (or whatever they were) don't even mention facebook. maybe even speedy keep in absence of a coherent nomination, but i can't say much because i'm no stranger to making those myself. the ip has some really weird contribs too, what's that about? consarn _{(prison phone) (crime record)} 11:18, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment: the IP will need to elaborate more on how the proposed new targets are "more accurate". When someone types "Anti-Muslim propaganda on Facebook" into the Wikipedia search box they would almost certainly be looking for an article or article section covering Islamophobic propaganda specifically on Facebook, and not an article on the general topic of Islamophobia or belief bias.
  IP is definitely in the right place bringing this redirect to RfD to propose a potentially controversial retarget; edit-warring over it is what has resulted in the semi-protection. In general, follow WP:Bold, revert, discuss when an edit you've made is reverted and you want to make that edit again. — AP 499D25 (talk) 09:06, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I don't writer in english, but Criticism of Facebook and Islamophobia_in_the_media#Social_media are new possibilities. AP 499D252804:14C:5BB1:9473:2AA4:3307:B22B:ECE4 (talk) 17:54, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

that's actually a pretty good thing to get out of the way. still, i disagree, as i think a reader looking for something under this specific title would want a section about anti-muslim stuff on an article about facebook. criticism of facebook doesn't really go in-depth about it, and islamophobia in the media isn't necessarily just about facebook consarn _{(prison phone) (crime record)} 11:04, 21 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Oppose current target as a generic title redirecting to a specific (India) subject section. Oppose targeting Criticism of Facebook as a specific subject (Muslim) to a generic article. Support targeting to Islamophobia in the media#Social media provided content from the current target is merged there. Jay 💬 08:53, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  I have copied content from current target section to the Islamophobia article Social media section. Jay 💬 13:25, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  Bolding my votes above for better visibility. Jay 💬 08:58, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, the current target of the redirect is far more likely to be what someone's looking for than any of the other suggestions I've seen. Someone searching "anti-Muslim propaganda on Facebook" is not going to want a general article on Islamophobia or criticism of Facebook, but rather the specific genre of Islamophobic content on Facebook that people are criticizing Facebook for. ApexParagon (talk) 19:29, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. ApexParagon sums up my precise feelings. Whether or not it is kept, if a reader clicks on "Anti-Muslim propaganda on Facebook", then that is what he or she is looking to read. Not generic criticisms of Facebook or generic complaints about a group.Jacqke (talk) 17:47, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. asilvering (talk) 22:54, 7 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• 2025–26 Big Bash League season → Big Bash League  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Delete this future season not mentioned even trivially in the main article. Similar nomination as the January 2024 RfD, where it was deleted. It has been recreated twice since, as redirect to the same target, and deleted the first time as a WP:G4. An attempt to make this an article was reverted as the article you have here has virtually no infomation in it. i suggest we certainly wait until the current afd about the 2026 and 2027 ipl seasons is complete Jay 💬 09:46, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Fine by me as the person who reestablished the redirect, but it'll need watching properly and squashing each time then Blue Square Thing (talk) 16:57, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, or preferably convert into an article. That will be created in a few months anyway when the full season details are released, but there has already been a lot of coverage of the retained players and unlike previous years, they have already held a Player Movement Window this year. There is enough for an article already for a tournament that absolutely will take place before the end of this year. The-Pope (talk) 04:46, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep and protect: a protection should keep it from being turned into an article before time. Vestrian24Bio 11:06, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep and protect per above. it's lio! | talk | work 08:41, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• If "there is enough for an article already" per The-Pope, then the redirect should be converted to the article shortly, or deleted per WP:REDYES. It definitely should NOT be protected, which will only prevent creation of the article. I understand the 2nd and 3rd Keep votes were based on the 1st Keep vote, but I didn't get the rationale of the 1st Keep vote. How many months are we talking? How is this useful as a redirect if the article might be created only by the end of the year? I don't see a draft in progress at draftspace either. The 4000+ bytes article attempted by Kumarpramit was blanked as well, as mentioned in the nomination. If creating a redirect as a placeholder and then watching and squashing each time someone tries to work on it, is a problem, a solution would be to delete and salt. Jay 💬 10:07, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  I assumed that the article was created disruptively; looking now, I see that it was done by a long-time editor. Then I don't think protection is necessary, although I don't know enough about the subject to determine whether or not an article right now would be appropriate. I have therefore struck my vote. it's lio! | talk | work 11:19, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: Nothing at the target about this season, making it a misleading redirect for anybody who searches for this. Hey man im josh (talk) 17:08, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per Josh. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 01:21, 6 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Disambiguate * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 01:21, 6 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Les Dix Commandements → Ten Commandments  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Delete per WP:FORRED. Phrase not mentioned in the target article, and the target article's subject had no affinity to the French language. Steel1943 (talk) 00:02, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Just discovered that Les Dix Commandements (musical) exists, meaning it may need to be moved to the nominated redirect's title per WP:PRECISE if the nominated redirect is deleted. Steel1943 (talk) 00:03, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Disambiguate "Les Dix Commandements" 1979 composition by Alexandre Tansman; "Lex Dix Commandements" 1998 album listed at List of best-selling albums in France; "Les Dix Commandements" 1910s 10 volume series by Émile Faguet; and the 2000 musical and its album Les Dix Commandements (musical) -- 65.92.246.77 (talk) 05:26, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Disambiguation draft requested(done) per 65 (giving this new template a whirl) BugGhost 🦗👻 09:01, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Move musical to target per Steel, since none of the others have articles and hatnote to the drafted DAB. -- Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 02:12, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Is there a primary topic? IP 65 has drafted a disambiguation page at the redirect.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 08:45, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• The drafted DAB looks good to me. Let's go with that. Fieari (talk) 23:34, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Final#Music. Jay 💬 09:21, 22 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Final (album)Final (album) → Final (Vol. 1)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Retarget to Final#Music now that Final (Vol. 2) is out; no PTOPIC. charlotte ^👸♥ 05:38, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• retarget to the disambiguaiton page -- 65.92.246.77 (talk) 08:10, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:12, 22 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Turnib → Turnip water  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Brand of turnip juice. Not mentioned in target. I don't think redirecting a specific unmentioned brand is appropriate, plus this is confusing (I initially thought this was a mispelling of "turnip". Rusalkii (talk) 03:55, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it is a brand of turnip juice. I bought some at a shop, thought what is this stuff, Googled it, and the Wikipedia article for Turnip water was linked, along with multiple images and pages making it clear that this is a Turkish brand of turnip juice. I am, however, struggling to find an authoritative single page (other than images and listings on multiple sales sites) which authoritatively states what it is, otherwise I would indeed have added a short mention in the target article. We could discuss this. I still can. I agree it looks like a misspelling of turnip, but it is not. 🤷

I think that reasons for keeping this include:

"If someone could plausibly enter the redirect's name when searching for the target article, it's a good redirect" from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion

"Alternative names redirect to the most appropriate article title" from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Redirect#Purposes_of_redirects

If you wish to continue to propose deletion, please could you clarify which items under https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Redirect#Reasons_for_deleting you believe this falls under?

Bmju (talk) 07:29, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

2, likely to cause confusion, since the article does not explain the connection between the redirect and turnip water. If it's mentioned in the article (and is actually appropriate there, for instance because this is a very prominent brand) the I have no objections to keeping the redirect. Rusalkii (talk) 07:45, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• delete per nom, as the brand is unmentioned and it could just as easily be an implausible tyop. if bmju had to rely on external sources (in this case google and real life) to correlate the two, then that means the redirect is not very pogchamp. do the younger folk still say that, or have they completely pivoted to skibidi? consarn _{(prison phone) (crime record)} 11:22, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per consarn. It is just a brand. A mention if added would be undue and promotional. If the company that manufactured the juice had an article and had sufficient info about this product, then the redirect would have been helpful. Jay 💬 09:39, 22 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).