Archives

Archive 1 (2004-2015) Archive 2 (2016-2021)

Petroleum industry in Iran has been nominated for an individual good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Chidgk1 (talk) 19:07, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article that you have been involved in editing—Akkuyu Nuclear Power Plant—has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. Chidgk1 (talk) 17:14, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Rwendland, thanks for your contribution on that text in Denisova's article. This user said that the same text you edited is not supported by the source. Maybe I have a problem translating the English? I think it is supported by the sources.[1]--Mhorg (talk) 11:30, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

On 21 January 2023, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Alireza Akbari, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Spencer^T•C 01:35, 21 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Labourhome logo, 2007.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 14:08, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Rwendland! Please could you have a look at Opinion polling for the next United Kingdom general election? There's an error reading "Error: Total length of format strings for #time exceeds 6000 bytes". I don't know if it's anything to do with opdrts, but from your work on that you seem like the right person to ask! Thanks :-) Ralbegen (talk) 20:23, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I was away yesterday. I've put one of the offending calls into my Sandbox, and it works fine there, so I suspect it is something to do with the context of use. It's not entirely clear, but the limited discussion in MediaWiki talk:Pfunc time too long suggests there may be a #time space or CPU time limit per article, and opdrts gets a huge amount of use in that article. That would be a huge blow to the opdrts technique if true! I will investigate some more today. Rwendland (talk) 11:20, 11 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

See Template:Opdrts#Implementation notes for discussion of the fix/workaround.

thanks for the chart--since this is the history article the more history it covers the better. Rjensen (talk) 17:46, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks to Rwendland for fixing this section!! I had hoped to enlist a knowledgeable person but never could, and I didn't get around to it myself. Jsryanjr (talk) 20:29, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2025 June 22 § Category:French military attachés on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Kaffet i halsen (talk) 09:33, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Blue Labour, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Telegraph.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:55, 8 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This is the biography of a living person and so it has to be treated with due care. one of the latest sub-headings states "COVID-19 testing company and subsequent arrest". This is false and dishonest. Nowhere has there been any report let alone suggestion that Mr malik was arrested at any point. Indeed this case has not been brought by the Police or the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) but by West Yorkshire Trading Standards. Inserting "arrest" is obviously a deliberate dishonesty and especially as this is a live case any reporting or comment should be very carefully considered due to sub judice rules that govern such situations. I invite senior editors to amend the piece and to protect the page till the trial is concluded. Yorkshire views (talk) 16:57, 23 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know, and I've amended my addition. The BBC cite actually does not make clear the case was brought by trading standards, and it saying the trial is at Bradford Crown Court with one of the charges being money laundering (seemingly a police criminal matter) led me to assume the police had brought the charge. Closer inspection of the Guardian cite shows it said National Trading Standards brought the charges. I cannot work out for sure if the charges are criminal or civil, though they appear to be criminal as they are at a Crown Court. Rwendland (talk) 11:41, 24 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for correcting the error which I accept was genuine. You will know that there are sometimes malignant forces on wikipedia, albeit they are a minority, and your corrective editing reinforces the positive. My understanding is that it is a criminal case but it is not the police or the CPS but West Yorkshire Trading Standards who have decided on the prosecution. Yorkshire views (talk) 00:03, 21 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Extended Range Attack Munition, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

MWFwiki (talk) 02:19, 2 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:19, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]