Archives

Archive 1

Hello Deltaspace42! This message is to inform you that due to editing inactivity, your access to AutoWikiBrowser may be temporarily removed. If you do not resume editing within the next week, your username will be removed from the CheckPage. This is purely for routine maintenance and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You may regain access at any time by simply requesting it at WP:PERM/AWB. Thank you! — MusikBot II ^talk 17:18, 10 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I wanted to thank you for the time and effort that you put into fighting vandalism on Wikipedia. Your contributions are very appreciated! Nyxion303💬 Talk 17:03, 8 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Can you tell me why do you think "Russian propaganda in educational system" is original research? Roman Kubanskiy (talk) 17:21, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Roman Kubanskiy: Hi! Per WP:SYNTH, you should not "combine material from multiple sources to state or imply a conclusion not explicitly stated by any of the sources".

I saw that many of the references are just news or articles (e.g. announcing the introduction of a unified line of history textbooks, entire textbook market being taken under control by structures close to Arkady Rotenberg, messenger Max (not sure why is it relevant in the context of propaganda?)), and all that is combined under the topic of Russian propaganda in educational system.

You mixed in stories about participating in workshops to make trench candles, teacher calling their students fascists, etc. and from all that somehow you conclude that it's a part of purposeful state policy to form loyalty and that kind of thing, which really feels like what WP:SYNTH is about. But let's see what others think in the discussion. Deltaspace⁴² (talk • contribs) 17:45, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The Max messenger is a national messenger, and as a Russian, I am very indignant that it is being used for propaganda purposes, forcing schoolchildren and students to install it. Regarding Medinsky's textbook, in short, he was often criticized for his propaganda activities. There are generalizing sources indicating propaganda in the education system. For example, these. [1], [2], [3], [4], [5]. Roman Kubanskiy (talk) 18:32, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Roman Kubanskiy: as a Russian, I also hate the Max messenger, but Wikipedia is supposed to be neutral, and I don't quite see how forcing to install something is immediately related to propaganda. You can copy the sources you mentioned into the AfD discussion. Deltaspace⁴² (talk • contribs) 18:57, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, that's what I thought about your origin at first, because I saw the extra parenthesis. I am neutral about Max, but the fact of forced installation must be recorded. The introduction itself was characterized by sources as propaganda. The question is whether this applies specifically to the education system. Roman Kubanskiy (talk) 19:01, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Roman Kubanskiy: What do you mean by extra parenthesis? If you think that's a smile, then no, I just opened the second parenthesis inside, so I need to close it twice. Deltaspace⁴² (talk • contribs) 19:13, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page 2025 Iraq drone attacks, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. ( | )

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can . Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 14:50, 11 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Deltaspace42, I processed your request for 2025 Iraq drone atacks to retain the attribution history. Please avoid making copy and paste moves in future to manually swap page content, as per Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia this is a copyright infringement. When doing so for merges/splits, then please include where the content has been copied from/to in the edit summary. Regards, CNC (talk) 12:25, 21 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for reverting, but ff you ever see anything like this [6] again, please report it to AIV immediately. That's grounds for an automatic indefinite block, not a level 2 warning. It's also worth looking at the TA's edit filter log, which is scarcely an improvement. Acroterion (talk) 13:38, 22 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Acroterion, hi! OK, I'll keep that in mind next time. Deltaspace⁴² (talk • contribs) 13:42, 22 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, it's usually good to be conservative with warnings and actions, but some people just have to be blocked. Acroterion (talk) 13:47, 22 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

All of them are pages by User:SANKOMOTA. Each of the pages do have a slightly promotional smell about them, but they all seem to possess sources which anchor the text. It's possible the right thing to do is move them to draft space. If you feel strongly about it, you may go to AFD with (all or some of) these four. I'm asking you give the user a chance and perhaps some encouragement. You are under no obligation to agree with my positions or honor my requests. Thanks for what you do. BusterD (talk) 15:21, 26 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

buster what is the main reason of Wikipedia to promote knowledge if there is an error on the article our vision is to edit and fix the article not to delete the articles, that's why Wikipedia encourages us to meet at wikimenias,share knowledge and different cultures ,if you red tag those one ,what about when am creating articles on my culture you will again delete them just becuase you dont know my culture ,lets use the pillars wisely as for now I feel like you violated the respect pillar maybe its becuase you have 5 extended user groups ?we are still gathering information about those articles as there aren't many references of them SANKOMOTA (talk) 15:35, 26 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@BusterD, hello! I don't think these articles should go to AfD, subjects seem to meet the notability requirements. However, the language in these articles sounds overly promotional and I suspect that all of it was generated by LLM. I placed promo and LLM tags on all four articles. I believe if these were draft articles and they were submitted, the submissions would highly likely be declined. Deltaspace⁴² (talk • contribs) 15:52, 26 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I will rephrase them i didn't even knew that there is something like LLM what is it i always Google for my sources ,that is why am saying I used all the Wikipedia pillars but that's we always gets when we create articles users from overseas always dismisses us i won't red flag maybe someone from china who wrote about a notable Chinese and claim that that articles isn't meeting the criteria who i am to dismiss them what am trying to say is rather than red flagging just put something like those articles need to be improved SANKOMOTA (talk) 15:58, 26 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@SANKOMOTA, I believe it would be better if you create new articles in the draft space in the future and then submit them for review. If you used Google AI Overview or AI mode, it is LLM (Large Language Model) too. Please read Wikipedia:Large language models. Deltaspace⁴² (talk • contribs) 16:03, 26 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

noted that but I dont use such ,I have 2 articles In my draft space and am still gathering resources about them I dont just do things becuase I know I mustn't violate the rules am.a facilitator so I won't to such things ,Thank you for advise but I dont use LLM.i dont even know it SANKOMOTA (talk) 16:06, 26 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Ahem. SANKOMOTA, your incivil comments above are 1) as directed at me, on the wrong talk page, mine is thattaway, 2) way out of line, and in violation of WP:Assume good faith, and 3) clearly contrary to your intention as being seen as a normal contributor, because Deltaspace42 replied appropriately. I advise SANKOMOTA to avoid making vague, sweeping statements, especially any bad faith inferences towards Deltaspace42. I cannot find a single error Deltaspace42 has made. Deltaspace42 reasonably tagged what I deemed four quite similar borderline WP:G11 pages. I declined the tag because I thought these were not irretrievably promotional based on some sourcing. The body of work, however, seems Wikipedia is promoting, not informing. Based solely on the comments in this thread, I agree with moving these to draftspace and requiring their submission through the WP:Articles for creation program. BusterD (talk) 21:11, 26 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, have you tagged iLEAD for speedy deletion? It is a authentic college page up for further finetuning and is very important for the 3000 students who have studied here and the more 2500 students currently studying here. The college is up for University status soon and is in talks with local government. There are multiple reasons where you should not delete the page, so can we talk real fast? The higher education institution founded in 2010 has very high repute in Eastern India. ILEAD - Institute of Leadership, Entrepreneurship and Development (talk) 11:57, 29 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@ILEAD - Institute of Leadership, Entrepreneurship and Development, please read Wikipedia:Speedy_deletion#G11. Deltaspace⁴² (talk • contribs) 13:01, 29 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. About 3 hours before I wrote this message, you reverted an unconstructive edit on Jorge Haddock Acevedo. The same editor came to the Teahouse and identified himself as the subject of the article, and then went back to the article, making a number of major edits. I reverted everything to the state you had left it, told him why I had done it, and informed him about COI. Just in case you wanted to know. TooManyFingers (talk) 19:18, 29 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

	Happy New Year!
	Hello Deltaspace42: Did you know ... that back in 1885, Wikipedia editors wrote Good Articles with axes, hammers and chisels? Thank you for your contributions to this encyclopedia using 21st century technology. I hope you don't get any unnecessary blisters. BhikhariInformer (talk) 13:52, 1 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Happy New Year elves}} to send this message

BhikhariInformer (talk) 13:52, 1 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I think I see how I (accidentally but stupidly!) wiped out a huge part of he Planet Money page now. It ws a bad error compounded by me failing to do a final review of the post-edited page. I'm mortified but learned a lesson. Thanks again for your assistance and kindness. I've since gone back and made the edit I was intending (to expand a section). Bookisher (talk) 18:30, 1 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• 
• 
• 

Happy New Year!

• 
  MMXXVI Lunar Calendar

Deltaspace42,
Have a great 2026 and thanks for your continued contributions to Wikipedia.

---

   – Background color is Very Peri (#6868ab), Pantone's 2026 Color of the year

Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year 2026}} to user talk pages.

– CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:30, 2 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I’ve noticed that some content in the "Promotion" section has been removed multiple times. The information is supported by the sources already cited in that section, which I have not removed or altered. I would appreciate it if editors could review the existing references before deleting any content. Thank you. ~2025-42862-24 (talk) 15:32, 2 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@~2025-42862-24, if you are talking about Bad Girls (Mónica Naranjo album) article, you added information such as "Naranjo recorded Bad Girls under pressure from Sony with limited creative control and felt that the album was not truly hers" and didn't provide reliable sources for it. Where you put references, they are missing URLs or outright broken, or don't support statements you added. Deltaspace⁴² (talk • contribs) 15:37, 2 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Did you eben read all 10 artikles? its literally on the artikles, please read them before undoing work when you dont eben speak spanish. you eben deleted proper released dates soursed. what are u doing

https://www.hola.com/actualidad/20191001150518/monica-naranjo-habla-enfermedad-hermano/

Please, do ur reasearh before. the sourses u mean are broken but the ones at the bottom refrense it ~2025-42862-24 (talk) 15:40, 2 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@~2025-42862-24, in any case, you should provide inline citations for each sentence or paragraph, so it's clear which source supports which statement, not just drop a bunch of links at the end of your text. Deltaspace⁴² (talk • contribs) 15:52, 2 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@~2025-42862-24, you also added unsourced information on Palabra de Mujer (album), I've reverted your edits there. Deltaspace⁴² (talk • contribs) 15:59, 2 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]