This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Politics and Government This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance). United States: Colorado / 20,000 Challenge Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Colorado, our collaboration to create, improve, and update Wikipedia articles about the U.S. State of Colorado. To comment about this article, select the Add topic tab above. For questions about, or to make suggestions for Colorado articles, go to our project's talk page. We invite you to join us! This article was created or improved during this WikiProject's 20,000 Challenge, which started on November 1, 2016, and is ongoing. You can help! Women's History Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Conservatism Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Women This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women U.S. Congress Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject U.S. Congress, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United States Congress on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.U.S. CongressWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. CongressTemplate:WikiProject U.S. CongressU.S. Congress Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is about one (or many) person(s). Politics: American / Gun politics Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by American politics task force (assessed as Low-importance). This article is supported by Gun politics task force (assessed as Low-importance).

ADD to Personal Life section: Boebert obtained her GED in 2020. 149.106.52.29 (talk) 10:08, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Already done in "Early life" section. Chaheel Riens (talk) 11:52, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This article describes Boebert as far-right in the opening few paragraphs, and immediately qualifies that assertion by saying that she rejects the label. When it comes to political beliefs, ought not a persons self-identification take precedence over labels or adjectives that they reject? It seems strange that on wikipedia, a person's self-identification trumps all other evidence over if they are male or female or some other category, e.g. wikipedia will refer to males as "she" if they self-identify as such, however with regards to political ideology, self-identification is disregarded, it would appear especially when the adjective/label carries a certain pejorative connotation.203.206.84.45 (talk) 16:01, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Re "far right" designation: Reliable independent sources prevail here, and Boebert would be classified as a (definitely) non-independent source. —RCraig09 (talk) 16:10, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

People keep reverting the infobox to make it seem like Boebert only has one predecessor, but this is not the case, so I'm bringing this here to finally be settled. I personally believe that the infobox should reflect that she represented two completely different districts, despite continuously serving in the House of Representatives. She moved, and was not redistricted. She has an obvious predecessor in the 3rd district (Scott Tipton), as well as one in the 4th (Greg Lopez), and the 3rd and 4th districts consist of completely different parts of the state. Brobbz (talk) 18:37, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I think the only reason that it should be listed the other way is that Florida Representative Mario Diaz-Balart did the same thing (moving districts in a non-redistricting year), but does not have separately listed sections in his infobox. 02rufus02 (talk) 23:35, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I see. But with Mario Díaz-Balart, it's a bit more complicated, since one term after he moved to the district his brother was vacating, MDB was redistricted to a district that significantly overlapped with the one he represented for the first eight years of his tenure (after all, South Florida isn't a very geographically large region), and both brothers were the first to represent their respective newly-created districts. Even though this might be a bit messy, perhaps a good compromise would to list LDB as MDB's predecessor and keep Boebert's infobox as is? Brobbz (talk) 14:44, 23 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I would argue that there can be some confusion about how there might be a gap in her service or if she lost her seniority because she moved districts. I would prefer it to be clear that she did not lose any seniority by switching districts with at least a clarification in her first paragraph.

It could state that she has been a representative since 2021, while representing the 3rd district from 2021-2025 and the 4th district since 2025. I think that would be clearer while keeping the infobox the same as she does have two different predecessors in each district and unlike redistricted members, she chose to switch districts. Mnchkn1408 (talk) 16:06, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It already pretty much says that in the second paragraph, but the wording there could be made clearer. Also seeing "Added a hyperlink for vaping" as the summary of the most recent edit made me chuckle for whatever reason. Brobbz (talk) 23:09, 6 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I just wanted updates for the page and I just added the hyperlink cuz why not? If it was my decision, more things would hyperlink. Mnchkn1408 (talk) 17:36, 7 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. I just think it's funny Brobbz (talk) 17:26, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure where this change happened, I'm not good at reading the logs. But it was in the last few edits. 99.126.182.211 (talk) 15:34, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I corrected it. – Muboshgu (talk) 16:16, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]