The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was KEEP. -- Jonel | Speak 21:39, 24 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Reason why the page should be deleted: Direct copy of the article for Syosset High School with appropriate name changes. Amazinms90 02:19, 19 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• This afd nomination was orphaned. Listing now. —Crypticbot (operator) 15:32, 19 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. There's no way this stuff (awrads won, etc) can be true of both schools, and the burden of proof is on the copycat.--Esprit15d 15:39, 19 January 2006 (UTC) Keep. per new information.--Esprit15d 19:28, 19 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep — the award applies to the school district as a whole, so of course it can apply to both. Yes the text was probably copied and slightly modified, so it may need some cleanup and verification. It is still an encyclopedic topic. :) — RJH 16:20, 19 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep The award applies to the district as a whole. Hipocrite - «Talk» 16:49, 19 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep no reason to delete. CalJW 16:53, 19 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, as per Wikipedia:Schools/Arguments#Keep. Carioca 19:46, 19 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, high school. Kappa 23:23, 19 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, barely notable. -Rebelguys2 22:13, 20 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, meets WP:SCH, assuming it's not copyvio.Gateman1997 00:28, 21 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep The school clearly exists. Kurt Weber 00:44, 23 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.