The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep. Mailer Diablo 01:04, 26 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sucks. --Kennyisinvisible 18:35, 20 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Fails even proposal for WP:SCHOOL, as it has less than 3 sentences, no picture and no interwikilink. Bobby1011 18:40, 20 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Actually WP:SCHOOL says "If it meets none of these criteria, but is still verifiable, it should be merged into the appropriate district..." It doesn't call for deletion, but merging instead (that's the whole concept of the compromise). --Rob 00:53, 24 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment. Actually, the nomination itself sucks. Kennyisinvisible, you should make a better case than that when you post a nom in AFD, regardless of how you feel about the subject. PJM 18:47, 20 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep It may be a stub, but there is plenty of precedent for keeping article on High Schools. OhNoitsJamie^Talk 18:54, 20 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per OhNoitsJamie. Chairman S. | Talk 19:27, 20 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy Keep and send to Wikipedia:WikiProject Schools James084 19:51, 20 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Yes, speedy keep, per James084. PJM 19:58, 20 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment: not speedy K'able with a vote for deletion extant, at least not without a larger majority. Adrian~enwiki (talk) 20:49, 20 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for pointing that out (applicability rule #3). PJM 21:34, 20 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Every school doesn't actually merit an article, and the precedent stating otherwise is goofy. Adrian~enwiki (talk) 20:53, 20 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep High School, but cleanup.--Isotope23 21:28, 20 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment All school articles get kept, even one room log cabin ones --Ruby 21:31, 20 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Nominator should familiarize self with WP:DP. -ikkyu2 (talk) 22:08, 20 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• and again keep Jcuk 23:59, 20 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep as a verified and notable school. Turnstep 04:28, 21 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Useful start. Choalbaton 18:28, 21 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep lots of schools have articles and so they should. Scranchuse 18:38, 21 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep — RJH 19:40, 21 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep and cleanup Schools should be listed but this one's a bit sloppy. Some cleanup work needed. Buchanan-Hermit™..CONTRIBS..SPEAK!. 04:28, 22 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep all high schools. Honbicot 16:21, 22 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, informative school stub. Kappa 23:56, 23 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.