The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was DELETE. — JIP | Talk 10:44, 18 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Unencyclopedic. It has been speedy deleted already but author keeps recreating. 202.156.6.54 06:29, 11 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete and protect from recreation. -x42bn6 Talk 07:11, 11 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as per nom. Dlyons493 Talk 09:32, 11 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete and protect from recreation, articles under this name have deleted four times already. -- Kjkolb 11:20, 11 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete nonsense CLW 15:43, 11 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy Delete and Protect: doesn't even make sense. If it's been recreated, protect it. Jesse 18:45, 11 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as per above. *drew 15:03, 13 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Z magazine-cruft. More leftist nonsense/screeching. Klonimus 09:47, 18 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.