The Tang campaigns against the Western Turks, were a series of military campaigns conducted by the Tang dynasty against the Western Turkic Khaganate in the 7th century. Early military conflicts were a result of the Tang interventions in the rivalry between the Western and Eastern Turks to weaken both. Under Emperor Taizong, campaigns were dispatched in the Western Regions against Gaochang in 640, Karasahr in 644 and 648, and Kucha in 648.
The wars against the Western Turks continued under Emperor Gaozong, and the khaganate was annexed after General Su Dingfang defeated Qaghan Ashina Helu in 657. The Western Turks attempted to capture the Tarim Basin in 670 and 677, but were repelled by the Tang. The Second Turkic Empire defeated the fragmented Western Turks in 712, and absorbed the tribes into their new empire.
The areas controlled by the Tang Empire came under the dynasty's cultural influences and the Turkic influence of the ethnically Turkic Tang soldiers stationed in the region. Indo-European prevalence in Central Asia declined as the expeditions accelerated Turkic migration into what is now Xinjiang. By the end of the 657 campaign, the Tang had reached its largest extent. The Turks, Tibetans, Muslim Arabs and the Tang competed for control over Central Asia until the collapse of the Tang in the 10th century.
Background

Decline of the Western Turks
The First Turkic Khaganate split into the Western and Eastern Turkic Khaganates after a civil war. Allied with the Byzantine Empire, the Western Turks fought in wars against the Sasanian Empire. The Western Turks expanded as the Eastern Turks declined.[1]
Under Shikui Qaghan (r. 611–619), the Western Turks took advantage of the collapsing Sui dynasty to embark on a slew of conquests. The Western Turks reached their apex under Tong Yabghu Qaghan (r. 619–628) when their influence stretched from the Altai Mountains in the northeast to the Aral Sea in the west and covering the Tarim Basin oasis states in the south. They extracted resources such as salt and fish from Yanqi (Karashahr) and developed a friendly relashionship with the kingdom of Gaochang (Karakhoja) west of modern day Turpan. In the west, the Western Turks subjugated Tashkent (Shiguo), the Tiele people, Fergana, and Maimargh. They also attacked Persia and Tokharistan in the southwest. During these military campaigns, the Western Turks cultivated friendly relations with the Tang dynasty in the hope that they would not interfere with their expansionist activity.[2]
Eventually, the Western Turks and the Tang dynasty came into conflict over control of the oasis states in the Tarim Basin. In 627, the Karluks rebelled against the Western Turks and in 628, Külüg Sibir murdered his nephew, Tong Yabghu Qaghan, and took the title of qaghan for himself. Tong Yabghu's son, Sy Yabghu Qaghan, fought against Külüg Sibir, splitting the Western Turks into the western Nushibi confederation and the eastern Duolu confederation.[3][4]
Seven oasis states around Yiwu County in present day Hami City defected to the Tang dynasty in 630 and the Western Yi Prefecture was created to administer the area. In 632, Western Yi Prefecture was upgraded to a regular prefecture called Yi Prefecture. Meanwhile, Sy Yabghu had defeated Külüg Sibir, but he became embroiled in another internal dispute after a failed campaign against the Xueyantuo, which forced him to flee to Samarkand in 632. Duolu Qaghan succeeded him as the new ruler only to die soon after in 634, further weakening the Western Turks' control over their subjects. The oasis states of Shule (Kashgar), Suoche (Yarkant County), and Yutian (Khotan) submitted to the Tang in 632 and 635.[5][6]
The Western Turks continued to suffer from instability under Duolu's successor, Ishbara Tolis (r. 634–638). He was compelled to divide the people live around the Chu River into two sections, both of which chose their own qaghans.[7]
Tang influence on the Western Turks
Gaozu's successor, Emperor Taizong, in his war against the Western and Eastern Turks, employed the Chinese strategy of "using barbarians to control barbarians". In 641, he instigated a civil war between the eastern and western confederations of the Western Turks by supporting Isbara Yabghu Qaghan. The qaghan in the east, Tu-lu Qaghan, invaded the oasis states controlled by Isbara Yabghu in the west. He assassinated his rival and unified the Western Turkic Khaganate.[8]
Following the reunification, Tu-lu Qaghan began orchestrating raids against Chinese cities. In 642, Emperor Taizong once again intervened by assisting a revolt against Tu-lu's reign. Disaffected Western Turkic tribes had requested the support of Taizong in Chang'an, who enthroned a new qaghan Irbis Seguy. Irbis Seguy was able to exert control over the Turkic tribes and the former qaghan fled in exile. The Tang court and the Western Turks began negotiating over the control of five oasis states in the Tarim Basin. Irbis Seguy wanted to strengthen his ties with the Tang through a royal marriage to a Tang princess. Although the oasis states were vassals of the Turks, Irbis Seguy did not have the power to simply cede them to the Tang. The possibility of further diplomatic exchanges ended when Taizong began his campaign against Yanqi and Qiuci in 648.[8][6]

Campaign against Gaochang
Gaochang (Karakhoja) was the first of the oasis states to be negatively impacted by the expansion of the Tang dynasty. Gaochang was a centralized kingdom organized under a Chinese form of government. It was the most sinicized of the oasis states, used Chinese writing as its official script and the Chinese language as its administrative language, studied the Chinese classics, and Han people made up a large portion of its population. Gaochang had a monopoly over trade between Chang'an and merchants from the west, generating massive tax revenue and enriching the Gaochang court.[7][9]
Gaochang had been ruled by the Qu family since 498 and had entered a marriage alliance with the Sui dynasty. In 630, its king Qu Wentai visited Chang'an to pay homage to the Tang, but relations between the two states soured after 632 or 638 when another trade route was opened north of present-day Lop Nur, bypassing Gaochang. Gaochang retaliated by raiding Yanqi, who had requested the opening of the new trade route, and intercepting travelers to China. Qu Wentai entered a military alliance with the Western Turk ruler Tu-lu Qaghan.[10][11]
With the help of the Western Turks, Gaochang seized Yanqi's territory in 638 and plotted to attack Yi Prefecture as well. In 639, Emperor Taizong reprimanded Qu Wentai and threatened to attack Gaochang if he did not change course. An edict was issued summoning Qu Wentai to the Tang court. The king of Gaochang ignored these demands with the excuse that he was sick. He did not believe that the Tang would be able to mount a successful attack against Gaochang because of the Gobi Desert and the difficulty of supplying a large army. Taizong appointed Hou Junji to lead an expeditionary force against Gaochang. When news arrived in 640 that the Tang army was fast approaching Gaochang, Qu Wentai was caught completely by surprise. With no way to defend against the impending attack, the king fell sick and died suddenly. The Western Turks sent a relief force but they fled as the Tang army approached. Qu Wentai's son, court officials, and a large number of tribal chieftains were captured and taken to Chang'an.[12][13]
Gaochang was annexed and transformed into Xi Prefecture in modern day Gaochang, Turpan under direct administration. Xi Prefecture was treated like a normal part of the Tang dynasty and land was redistributed based on the equal-field system, household registers were updated every three years, and taxes were levied in the form of corvée labor, grain, and cloth. According to household registers in 640, there were 37,700 people in 8,000 households in Xi Prefecture. Xi Prefecture became the seat of the Protectorate General to Pacify the West, a combined civil and military administration backed by an army.[14][15][16]
Campaigns against Karasahr
In 632, Yanqi (Karasahr) submitted to the Tang as a tributary state, as did the nearby kingdoms of Shule (Kashgar) and Yutian (Khotan). Tensions between the Tang and Yanqi grew as the Chinese expanded further into Central Asia. After the Tang annexed Gaochang, the Tang army was stationed there only a short distance away from Yanqi, and posed a direct threat to the oasis state.[16]
Yanqi allied with the Western Turkic Khaganate and ceased sending tribute to the Tang court. In 644, a military campaign was dispatched by the Tang emperor against Yanqi. Led by Commander Guo Xiaoke, protectorate-general of the Anxi Protectorate, the army marched towards Yanqi from Yulduz under the cover of night. The Tang forces mounted a surprise attack at dawn, resulting in the defeat of a Western Turk army and the capture of Yanqi's king. Yanqi returned to being a Tang tributary.[16][15][17]
Yanqi was controlled by proxy through a Tang loyalist, Long Lipozhun, the brother of the captured ruler. He was deposed in 648 by his cousin, with the support of the kingdom of Qiuci (Kucha), nominally a Tang vassal, and the Western Turks. In 648, the Tang conducted a second military campaign against Yanqi, commanded by Ashina She'er, a member of the Turkic Ashina royal family who had submitted to the Tang. Yanqi fell, the usurper was beheaded, and Tang rule was re-established under another Tang loyalist who declared himself a loyal vassal. A Chinese military garrison was established in the kingdom, the first of the Four Garrisons of Anxi.[18][17]
Campaign against Kucha
After the fall of Yanqi, Ashina Sh'er's army marched towards the neighboring kingdom of Qiuci (Kucha).[17] Qiuci was nominally a vassal of the Tang but it aided Yanqi in its rebellion in 644 and also stopped paying tribute to the Tang.[16]
She'er's decoy horsemen led the defending Qiuci forces, numbering 50,000 soldiers, into an ambush. The Qiuci soldiers retreated to the nearby city of Aksu after their defeat. The Tang army besieged the city for forty days. Qiuci surrendered on 19 January 649 and She'er captured the king. The surrounding tribes loyal to Qiuci submitted to the Tang.[19][15]
Qiuci was placed under the control of the Anxi Protectorate under Guo Xiaoke, but remnants of Qiuci's forces returned with Western Turk allies and recaptured the city, killing Guo. Ashina She'er retook the city and killed 11,000 of the conquered inhabitants as reprisal for the death of Guo Xiaoke. With the defeat of Qiuci and the submission of the three oasis states further west, the Tang gained control of the entire Tarim Basin. In 649, the seat of the Anxi Protectorate was moved to Qiuci and the Four Garrisons of Anxi were established in Qiuci (Kucha), Shule (Kashgar), Yutian (Khotan), and Yanqi (Karasahr).[20]
Campaign against the Western Turks

Ashina Helu, a former Tang general in Gansu, fled west and declared himself qaghan of the Western Turks,[24] unifying the Turkic tribes under a single khaganate.[25] Helu invaded the kingdoms of the Tarim Basin and led frequent raids against bordering Tang cities.[24] Emperor Gaozong sent an army led by Su Dingfang to defeat the Western Turks. The Turkic commanders Ashina Mishe and Ashina Buzhen, rivals of Helu, led the side divisions.[19]
Ten thousand Uyghur horsemen participated in the campaign as allies of the Tang.[19] Porun, a Uyghur leader enthroned by Emperor Taizong, oversaw the Uyghur cavalry as a vice commander. He served under the leadership of the Yanran protector-general and vice protector-general, administrators of the Yanran Protectorate.[26] The army departed from Ordos in March and traversed through 4,800 km (3,000 mi) of steppes and desert, without stopping by the oasis kingdoms for supplies.[27] Along the way, tribes like the Chumkun and Su offered additional reinforcements.[28] The troops reached Kyrgyzstan by November, enduring the harsh conditions of winter.[29]
Su Dingfang defeated Helu's army of 100,000 cavalry at the battle of Irtysh River, fought along the Irtysh River in the Altai Mountains region. Helu had been caught off guard by Su's ambush and suffered a large number of casualties. The Qaghan attempted to flee to Tashkent, but was caught the next day and sent to the Tang capital as a prisoner. The remaining tribes of the Western Turks surrendered.[30][28] Gaozong pardoned Helu, but he died the following year.[31]
Further campaigns
The dissolution of the khaganate fragmented the Western Turkic tribes. In 670, a Western Turkic tribe allied with the Tibetan Empire and invaded the Tarim Basin. The Anxi protectorate was abandoned and the Tang withdrew back to Xi Prefecture (Gaochang). Control of the oasis states returned to the Tang between 673 and 675, and the protectorate was re-established.[32] Others argue that the protectorate was not re-established until 692.[33]
In 677, the Western Turk commander Ashina Duzhi allied with the Tibetans and conducted a second military expedition with the Tibetans against the Tang in the Tarim Basin. The Turks were repelled by the Tang and defeated in 679. Tang forces captured Ashina Duzhi and annexed Tokmak, known as Suiye in Chinese, which was transformed into a military base.[34][35]
Ilterish Qaghan of the Eastern Turks founded the Second Turkic Khaganate after a successful revolt in 682. The expansion of the khaganate continued under Ilterish's brother, Qapaghan Qaghan. In 712, Kul Tigin, son of Ilterish, defeated the remnants of the Western Turks, members of the Turgis confederation. Now defeated, the Western Turks were absorbed into the new empire.[36]
Historical significance
The Tang campaigns marked the end of Indo-European Xinjiang.[20][37] As the Turkic empire disintegrated, Turkic linguistic and cultural influences spread into Xinjiang and throughout Central Asia.[38] Tang China was also responsible for the influx of Turkic migrants, because of the number of Turks that served in the Tang military as soldiers and generals during the dynasty's military expeditions.[38]
Tang influence in the Central Asia encompassed art, trade, and politics. Chinese coinage remained in use in Xinjiang after the Tang withdrew from the region.[39] Central Asian art adopted many Tang Chinese stylistic elements, like the sancai three color glaze used for ceramics.[40] According to Chinese sources, Turkic states and polities still valued ties with the courts of dynasties in northern China as a form of prestige. The Qarakhan and Qarakhitay khans held titles that identified them as Tabghach or Khitay, named after kingdoms in northern China.[41] Tang architectural influences are apparent in the Buddhist architecture in Dunhuang.[42]
See also
Notes
References
Citations
- ↑ Wechsler 1979, p. 223.
- ↑ Wang 2013, p. 38-39.
- ↑ Wang 2013, p. 39.
- ↑ Golden 1992, p. 135.
- ↑ Wang 2013, p. 39-40.
- 1 2 Baumer 2012, p. 205.
- 1 2 Wang 2013, p. 40.
- 1 2 Wechsler 1979, p. 224.
- ↑ Hansen 2012, p. 91.
- ↑ Wang 2013, p. 40-41.
- ↑ Wechsler 1979, pp. 224–225.
- ↑ Wang 2013, p. 41-42.
- ↑ Baumer 2012, p. 169.
- ↑ Hansen 2012, p. 91-92.
- 1 2 3 Wang 2013, p. 42.
- 1 2 3 4 Wechsler 1979, p. 226.
- 1 2 3 Grousset 1970, p. 99.
- ↑ Wechsler 1979, p. 226-228.
- 1 2 3 Skaff 2009, p. 183.
- 1 2 Wechsler 1979, p. 228.
- ↑ Baumer, Christoph (18 April 2018). History of Central Asia, The: 4-volume set. Bloomsbury Publishing. p. 243. ISBN 978-1-83860-868-2.
- ↑ Grenet, Frantz (2004). "Maracanda/Samarkand, une métropole pré-mongole". Annales. Histoire, Sciences Sociales. 5/6: Fig. B.
- ↑ Whitfield, Susan (2004). The Silk Road: Trade, Travel, War and Faith. British Library. Serindia Publications, Inc. p. 110. ISBN 978-1-932476-13-2.
- 1 2 Twitchett 2000, p. 116.
- ↑ Skaff 2009, p. 181.
- ↑ Skaff 2012, p. 249.
- ↑ Skaff 2009, p. 189.
- 1 2 Skaff 2009, p. 184.
- ↑ Grousset 1970, p. 102.
- ↑ Twitchett & Wechsler 1979, p. 280.
- ↑ Skaff 2009, pp. 284–286.
- ↑ Twitchett & Wechsler 1979, pp. 285–286.
- ↑ Baumer 2012, p. 170.
- ↑ Twitchett & Wechsler 1979, p. 286.
- ↑ Baumer 2012, p. 206.
- ↑ Beckwith 2009, p. 131.
- ↑ Grousset 1970, pp. 100.
- 1 2 Millward 2007, p. 42.
- ↑ Millward 2007, pp. 41–42.
- ↑ Millward 2007, p. 41.
- ↑ Millward 2007, p. 42.
- ↑ Findley 2004, p. 41.
Sources
- Baumer, Christopher (2012), The History of Central Asia: The Age of the Steppe Warriors, I.B. Taurus
- Beckwith, Christopher I. (2009). Empires of the Silk Road: A History of Central Eurasia from the Bronze Age to the Present. Princeton University Press. ISBN 978-1-4008-2994-1.
- Benn, Charles D. (2002). China's Golden Age: Everyday Life in the Tang Dynasty. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-517665-0.
- Findley, Carter Vaughn (2004). The Turks in World History. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-988425-4.
- Golden, Peter B. (1992), An Introduction to the History of the Turkic Peoples: Ethnogenesis and State-Formation in Medieval and Early Modern Eurasia and the Middle East, Otto Harrassowitz
- Grousset, René (1970). The Empire of the Steppes: A History of Central Asia. Rutgers University Press. ISBN 978-0-8135-1304-1.
- Hansen, Valerie (2012). The Silk Road: A New History. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-515931-8.
- Millward, James A. (2007). Eurasian Crossroads: A History of Xinjiang. Columbia University Press. ISBN 978-0-231-13924-3.
- Skaff, Jonathan Karem (2009). Nicola Di Cosmo (ed.). Military Culture in Imperial China. Harvard University Press. ISBN 978-0-674-03109-8.
- Skaff, Jonathan Karam (2012). Sui-Tang China and Its Turko-Mongol Neighbors: Culture, Power, and Connections, 580–800. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-973413-9.
- Twitchett, Denis (2000). H. J. Van Derven (ed.). Warfare in Chinese History. BRILL. ISBN 978-90-04-11774-7.
- Twitchett, Denis; Wechsler, Howard J. (1979). "Kao-tsung (reign 649–83) and the empress Wu: the inheritor and the usurper". In Twitchett, Dennis (ed.). The Cambridge History of China, Volume 3: Sui and T'ang China, 589–906, Part I. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. pp. 242–289. ISBN 978-0-521-21446-9.
- Wang, Zhenping (2013), Tang China in Multi-Polar Asia: A History of Diplomacy and War, University of Hawaii Press
- Wechsler, Howard J. (1979). "T'ai-tsung (reign 626–49) the consolidator". In Twitchett, Dennis (ed.). The Cambridge History of China, Volume 3: Sui and T'ang China, 589–906, Part I. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. pp. 188–241. ISBN 978-0-521-21446-9.
