Shortcuts
WikiProject Stub sorting
Information
Project page talk
- Stub types (sections) talk
- Stub types (full list) talk
- To do talk
- Naming conventions talk
- Redirects category talk
Wikipedia:Stub talk
Discussion
Proposals (A) talk
- Current month
Discussion talk
Criteria (A) (discontinued) talk
Deletion (Log) (discontinued) talk
Category

On this WikiProject Stub sorting subpage, you can propose new stub types (please read the procedures beforehand!), as well as the reorganization and subdivision of existing stub types. You can also discuss anything else related to stubs on the talk page.

Proposing new stub types – procedure

Important: If you wish to propose the creation of a stub ARTICLE you've come to the wrong place. If you don't have a username yourself, please go to WP:AFC for proposing a new article. If you already have a username, you can create the article yourself. If you don't know how, add {{Helpme}} to your user talk page to request help from other editors. This page only deals with stub TEMPLATES and CATEGORIES; we cannot help you with creating articles.

Proposing new stub types
If you wish to propose a new stub category and template, please follow these procedures:
  1. Check the List of stub types or under Category:Stub categories to make sure that your proposed new stub does not already exist.
  2. List it at the top of the current month's section, under a header, like the ones shown (if any). Sign it with a datestamp (~~~~).
    • Please bear in mind that a stub category isn't about the importance or notability of the topic!
  3. Find a good number[1] of stub articles, as many as you can, that will fit that template. You may use this tool to scan through categories; tagged stubs are always in Category:All stub articles and transclude {{asbox}}. Each of these articles can be:
    • currently marked with {{stub}};
    • currently marked with another type of stub tag (in which case you should justify why your tag is better for the article than the current one);
    • a stub whose categorisation is highly ambiguous or questionable;
    • not marked as a stub.
  4. If you use any category scan (from the tool mentioned above or from any other), please link to it so that other users can confirm that the results are still accurate.
  5. Others may do the same, if they so desire.
  6. 5 days after listing it here, if there is general approval or no objection, go ahead and create the new category and/or template following the format on Wikipedia:Stub. List the new stub type on the stub types list in an appropriate section. If consensus is not clear, or discussion is still ongoing, the proposal will remain open until consensus can be reached.
  7. If you wish to propose a stub type which does not currently have 60 articles that could use it, you may propose an upmerged template in a similar way. An upmerged template would feed into currently existing stub categories until such time that there are enough stubs for a separate stub category. At that point a category for it may be separately proposed. Some times, it may be difficult to be sure how many stubs would get a tag - in which case you can also start with an upmerged stub tag until you're sure there are enough.

DO NOT place a proposal here for any stub type which has already been created and is being discussed at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion. The proposal page is only for stub types that have not yet been created, and it is better to keep any discussion of such stub types in one place rather than splitting it between different pages. Wikipedia:Categories for discussion is the correct page for proposals to delete a stub type.

^ Good number means about 60 articles or more, or 30 or more if it is the primary stub type of a WikiProject, though this figure may vary from case to case.

"Speedy creation"

A stub type may be proposed for "speedy creation" if it meets one of the following criteria:

  • S1 - the creation of a category for which an approved upmerged template already exists and is now in use on more than 60 articles.
  • S2 - the creation of an upmerged national-level template for a subject in which other such national-level templates currently exist (e.g., X-bio-stub, X-hist-stub, or X-geo-stub, where X is the name of an internationally widely recognised country) or other instances where a clearly established pattern of similar subtypes exists. The proposed topic may not be controversial in scope.

List speedy creation proposals in the same proposal listings as normal stub proposals below.

Proposals, February 2025

Please check how many articles qualify for a stub type before proposing it.

NEW PROPOSALS

Category:Ampullariidae stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
{{Ampullariidae-stub}} has 68 transclusions; it is currently upmerged into Category:Architaenioglossa stubs. - OpalYosutebito (talk) 04:57, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:Ramanathapuram district geography stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
{{Ramanathapuram-geo-stub}} has over 60 transclusions, and Tamil Nadu geography stubs is becoming oversized... - OpalYosutebito (talk) 01:45, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:Pectinidae stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
{{Pectinidae-stub}} has 86 transclusions; it is currently upmerged into Category:Bivalve stubs. jlwoodwa (talk) 00:36, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:Mytilidae stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
{{Mytilidae-stub}} has 63 transclusions; it is currently upmerged into Category:Bivalve stubs, which has 651 stubs. I think this is worth diffusing. jlwoodwa (talk) 00:03, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:Tiruvannamalai district geography stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
{{Tiruvannamalai-geo-stub}} has 60 transclusions, and Tamil Nadu geography stubs is becoming oversized... - OpalYosutebito (talk) 16:57, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Proposals, January 2025

Category:Hunan railway station stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
{{Hunan-railstation-stub}} has over 130 transclusions - OpalYosutebito (talk) 04:16, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:Rewari district geography stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Haryana geography stubs is oversized and there are over 60 pages in need of a new template; see here for the list of pages awaiting the new template and category. - OpalYosutebito (talk) 22:05, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:Bhiwani district geography stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Haryana geography stubs is oversized and there are over 100 pages in need of a new template; see here for the list of pages awaiting the new template and category. - OpalYosutebito (talk) 22:04, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:West Champaran district geography stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Bihar geography stubs is oversized and there are over 100 pages in need of a new template; see here for the list of pages awaiting the new template and category. - OpalYosutebito (talk) 17:44, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:Solapur district geography stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
{{Solapur-geo-stub}} has over 110 transclusions. - OpalYosutebito (talk) 16:02, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:Madagascar river stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
{{Madagascar-river-stub}} has over 60 transclusions. - OpalYosutebito (talk) 23:38, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support speedy cat as the template already exists.Her Pegship (?) 00:08, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:Al-Hasakah Governorate geography stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
{{AlHasakahSY-geo-stub}} has over 70 transclusions. - OpalYosutebito (talk) 23:28, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support speedy cat as the template already exists.Her Pegship (?) 00:08, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:Idlib Governorate geography stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
{{IdlibSY-geo-stub}} has over 430 transclusions. - OpalYosutebito (talk) 23:28, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support speedy cat as the template already exists.Her Pegship (?) 00:08, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:Washington County, Ohio geography stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
{{WashingtonCountyOH-geo-stub}} has over 60 transclusions. - OpalYosutebito (talk) 22:17, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support speedy cat as the template already exists.Her Pegship (?) 00:08, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:2020s Canadian documentary film stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
{{2020s-Canada-documentary-film-stub}} has over 180 transclusions. - OpalYosutebito (talk) 22:06, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support speedy cat as the template already exists.Her Pegship (?) 00:08, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:2010s Canadian documentary film stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
{{2010s-Canada-documentary-film-stub}} has over 200 transclusions. - OpalYosutebito (talk) 21:57, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support speedy cat as the template already exists.Her Pegship (?) 00:08, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:Anguidae stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
{{Anguidae-stub}} has over 60 transclusions. - OpalYosutebito (talk) 17:21, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support speedy cat as the template already exists.Her Pegship (?) 19:41, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support - parent category:Lizard stubs is oversized. William Avery (talk) 12:00, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:Ancient Greek philosopher stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
{{AncientGreece-philosopher-stub}} has 190 transclusions. - OpalYosutebito (talk) 15:04, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support speedy cat as the template already exists.Her Pegship (?) 19:41, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:New Mexico state court judge stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
{{NewMexico-state-judge-stub}} has over 60 transclusions. - OpalYosutebito (talk) 14:41, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support speedy cat as the template already exists.Her Pegship (?) 19:41, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:2010s indie pop album stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
{{2010s-indie-pop-album-stub}} has over 80 transclusions. - OpalYosutebito (talk) 14:32, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support speedy cat as the template already exists.Her Pegship (?) 19:41, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

2000s Canadian documentary film stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
I would like this to be a sub-category of Category:2000s Canadian film stubs, Category:Canadian documentary film stubs, and Category:2000s documentary film stubs, since {{2000s-Canada-documentary-film-stub}} has over 120 transclusions. - OpalYosutebito (talk) 02:53, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support speedy cat as the template already exists.Her Pegship (?) 19:41, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

2000s Bengali film stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
I would like this to be a sub-category of Category:2000s film stubs and Category:Bengali-language film stubs, since {{2000s-Bengali-film-stub}} has over 100 transclusions. - OpalYosutebito (talk) 02:52, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support speedy cat as the template already exists.Her Pegship (?) 19:41, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

1990s Canadian documentary film stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
I would like this to be a sub-category of Category:1990s Canadian film stubs, Category:Canadian documentary film stubs, and Category:1990s documentary film stubs, since {{1990s-Canada-documentary-film-stub}} has over 60 transclusions. - OpalYosutebito (talk) 02:42, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support speedy cat as the template already exists.Her Pegship (?) 19:41, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

1920s mystery novel stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
I would like this to be a sub-category of Category:1920s novel stubs and Category:Mystery novel stubs, since {{1920s-mystery-novel-stub}} has over 60 transclusions. - OpalYosutebito (talk) 01:46, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support speedy cat as the template already exists.Her Pegship (?) 19:41, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

17th-century play stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
I would like this to be a sub-category of Category:Pre-18th-century play stubs, since {{17thC-play-stub}} has over 200 transclusions. - OpalYosutebito (talk) 01:26, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support speedy cat as the template already exists.Her Pegship (?) 19:41, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Çankırı Province geography stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
I would like this to be a sub-category of Category:Central Anatolia region geography stubs, since {{Çankırı-geo-stub}} has over 400 transclusions. - OpalYosutebito (talk) 01:16, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support speedy cat as the template already exists.Her Pegship (?) 19:41, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Yozgat Province geography stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
I would like this to be a sub-category of Category:Central Anatolia region geography stubs, since {{Yozgat-geo-stub}} has 60 transclusions. - OpalYosutebito (talk) 01:16, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support speedy cat as the template already exists.Her Pegship (?) 19:41, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Rize Province geography stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
I would like this to be a sub-category of Category:Black Sea region geography stubs, since {{Rize-geo-stub}} has over 160 transclusions. - OpalYosutebito (talk) 23:58, 28 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support speedy cat as the template already exists.Her Pegship (?) 00:55, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Sivas Province geography stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
I would like this to be a sub-category of Category:Central Anatolia region geography stubs, since {{Sivas-geo-stub}} has over 200 transclusions. - OpalYosutebito (talk) 23:09, 28 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support speedy cat as the template already exists.Her Pegship (?) 00:55, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:Changsha Metro stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
I would like a new template and category to be a member of Category:People's Republic of China rapid transit stubs and Category:Changsha Metro, since there are over 60 stub articles that need it. See here for the list of articles awaiting this new template. - OpalYosutebito (talk) 01:13, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:Sri Lankan railway station stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was created.
I would like this to be a sub-category of Category:Asian railway station stubs and Category:Railway stations in Sri Lanka, since {{SriLanka-railstation-stub}} has over 60 transclusions. - OpalYosutebito (talk) 00:25, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support speedy cat as the template already exists. Her Pegship (?) 01:01, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: I think this should probably be formatted as Category:Sri Lanka railway station stubs. Her Pegship (?) 00:55, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
What makes you say that? - OpalYosutebito (talk) 15:50, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Some stub cats use the country name without the possessive, some with, and I see that most of the Asian railway station stub cats use Fooian, so I retract my suggestion. Thanks! Her Pegship (?) 00:07, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, good to know. - OpalYosutebito (talk) 00:08, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:Kagawa railway station stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was created as Kaga Prefecture railway station stubs.
I would like this to be a sub-category of Category:Japanese railway station stubs and Category:Railway stations in Kagawa Prefecture, since {{Kagawa-railstation-stub}} has over 80 transclusions. - OpalYosutebito (talk) 00:23, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support speedy cat as the template already exists. Her Pegship (?) 01:01, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:Amphisbaenidae stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Proposing a category and template for Amphisbaenidae stubs, since there are currently over 100 stubs that could use them and the parent category, Category:Lizard stubs, is oversized. William Avery (talk) 13:32, 26 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nom. Her Pegship (?) 01:01, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:Tropiduridae stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Proposing a category and template for Tropiduridae stubs, since there are currently over 120 stubs that could use them and the parent category, Category:Lizard stubs, is oversized. William Avery (talk) 13:32, 26 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nom. Her Pegship (?) 01:01, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:Teiidae stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Proposing a category and template for Teiidae stubs, since there are currently over 100 stubs that could use them and the parent category, Category:Lizard stubs, is oversized. William Avery (talk) 13:32, 26 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nom. Her Pegship (?) 01:01, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:Phrynosomatidae stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Proposing a category and template for Phrynosomatidae stubs, since there are currently over 120 stubs that could use them and the parent category, Category:Lizard stubs, is oversized. William Avery (talk) 13:32, 26 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nom. Her Pegship (?) 01:01, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:Liolaemidae stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Proposing a category and template for Liolaemidae stubs, since there are currently over 170 stubs that could use them and the parent category, Category:Lizard stubs, is oversized. William Avery (talk) 13:32, 26 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nom. Her Pegship (?) 01:01, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:Dactyloidae stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Proposing a category and template for Dactyloidae stubs, since there are currently over 350 stubs that could use them and the parent category, Category:Lizard stubs, is oversized. William Avery (talk) 13:32, 26 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nom. Her Pegship (?) 01:01, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:Hangzhou Metro stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
I would like a new template and category to be a member of Category:People's Republic of China rapid transit stubs and Category:Hangzhou Metro, since there are over 240 stub articles that need it. See here for the list of articles awaiting this new template. - OpalYosutebito (talk) 20:29, 25 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nom. Her Pegship (?) 01:01, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:Shenyang Metro stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
I would like a new template and category to be a member of Category:People's Republic of China rapid transit stubs and Category:Shenyang Metro, since there are over 80 stub articles that need it. See here for the list of articles awaiting this new template. - OpalYosutebito (talk) 18:49, 25 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nom. Her Pegship (?) 01:01, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:Inner Mongolia railway station stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was created.
I would like this to be a sub-category of Category:China railway station stubs and Category:Railway stations in Inner Mongolia, since {{InnerMongolia-railstation-stub}} has over 60 transclusions. - OpalYosutebito (talk) 18:49, 25 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support speedy cat as the template already exists. Her Pegship (?) 01:01, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:Tianjin railway station stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
I would like this to be a sub-category of Category:China railway station stubs and Category:Railway stations in Tianjin, since {{Tianjin-railstation-stub}} has over 90 transclusions. - OpalYosutebito (talk) 01:10, 24 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nom. Her Pegship (?) 23:49, 24 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:Cycloctenidae stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Proposing a category and template for Cycloctenidae stubs, since there are currently over 60 stubs that could use them. William Avery (talk) 19:36, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nom. Her Pegship (?) 23:49, 24 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:Desidae stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Proposing a category and template for Desidae stubs, since there are currently over 70 stubs that could use them. William Avery (talk) 19:36, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nom. Her Pegship (?) 23:49, 24 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:Orsolobidae stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Proposing a category and template for Orsolobidae stubs, since there are currently over 90 stubs that could use them. William Avery (talk) 19:33, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nom. Her Pegship (?) 23:49, 24 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:Poeciliidae stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Proposing a category and template for Poeciliidae stubs, since there are currently 98 stubs that could use them. William Avery (talk) 14:32, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:Rivulidae stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Proposing a category and template for Rivulidae stubs, since there are currently 72 stubs that could use them. William Avery (talk) 14:32, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:Nothobranchiidae stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Proposing a category and template for Nothobranchiidae stubs, since there are currently 66 stubs that could use them. William Avery (talk) 14:32, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:Dolomedidae stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was upmerged template created.
Proposing a category and template for Dolomedidae stubs, since there are currently over 20 stubs that could use them, as well as a further 108 articles to be created shortly that would fall under this category due to their taxonomic placement. Species in this family are generally a neglected group in Wikipedia and in general, hence the high number of redlinks. Mediocre.marsupial (talk) 02:07, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest we wait for a category until more of those articles have been created, but I support creation of an upmerged template. Her Pegship (?) 20:26, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:Cottidae stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Proposing a category and template for Cottidae stubs, since there are currently over 120 stubs that could use them. William Avery (talk) 15:49, 12 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:Liparidae stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Proposing a category and template for Liparidae stubs, since there are currently over 150 stubs that could use them. William Avery (talk) 15:49, 12 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:Cottoidei stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Proposing a category and template for Cottoidei stubs, since there are currently over 120 stubs that could use them, assuming that the proposals for Liparidae and Cottidae succeed. William Avery (talk) 15:49, 12 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Allikas: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WSS/P
No tags for this post.