If you are unable to complete a move for technical reasons, you can request technical help below. This is the correct method if you tried to move a page, but you got an error message saying something like "You do not have permission to move this page, for the following reasons:..." or "The/This page could not be moved, for the following reason:..."

• BBC West Midlands → BBC Midlands (move · ) – In short there is no 'BBC West Midlands', the BBC English Region which serves the West Midlands is named 'BBC Midlands', that is their corporate directorate identity and the noun used to describe that part of the organisation. Indeed the rest of the page refers to it as BBC Midlands. Other examples use the correct noun for the service, see BBC North East and Cumbria. At the moment, the BBC Midlands page points to a page which displays both the East and West Midlands variant, however this page should probably be deleted as it adds nothing, persons looking up BBC East Midlands will find this, and BBC Midlands already points to the East Midlands being a separate region. 37.60.87.245 (talk) 21:29, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  Some sourcing confirming this would be useful, I'm not seeing an awful lot online. In fact, I'm not certain what "BBC West Midlands" even does; is it just the news region? A lot of other content seems to be divided into other sorts of regions, for example the website has Birmingham and the Black Country, Coventry and Warwickshire etc. This page here seems to use "West Midlands", as our article does. It seems like maybe the east and west split some time ago, and perhaps there's no primary topic. Absent more positive evidence I'd think an RM is in order anyway.  — Amakuru (talk) 11:32, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Cathepsin L2 → Cathepsin V (currently a redirect back to Cathepsin L2) (move · ) – The name Cathepsin V has come into majority use over Cathepsin L2. See Google Scholar hits since 2021 using both. Gold Broth (talk) 21:39, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  @Gold Broth - can you provide a link to your GS results? When looking at V vs L2 in since 2024 I see about a 2x return in results, but there is still clearly use as L2, and I don't have the subject matter expertise to understand that these two are the same, but I'm not sure that 90 vs 180 is showing a significant shift. This seems like there might be a shift going on, and I would suggest a full RM discussion on the talk page, which you seem to have started an informal one already. TiggerJay (talk) 05:25, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Ako Legal Wife: Mano Po 4? → Mano Po 4: Ako Legal Wife (currently a redirect back to Ako Legal Wife: Mano Po 4?) (move · ) – The title "Ako Legal Wife: Mano Po 4?" is just stylization, and is also missing an exclamation mark from the film's promotional material. Revert back to original title. DasKlose (talk) 12:06, 21 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  To be clear, it seems like this is not reverting back to the origional title, which was Ako Legal Wife which was stable from 2009 to 2024, when it was moved to the current title. It does not appear it was ever at Mano Po 4: Ako legal Wife as an article. TiggerJay (talk) 05:32, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  Rotten Tomatoes uses just "Ako Legal Wife", which seems sufficiently unambiguous. Prefixes and suffixes of titles are often omitted from article titles for the sake of conciseness (see WP:SUBTITLES). Wikipedia is under no obligation to try to reproduce a "film's promotional material". On the other hand, using "Man Po 4" as a prefix can help identify the subject, since that is an alternative title by which the film is well known, and it helps show its membership and position in the Man Po film series. —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 16:48, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Koreans in the United Kingdom → British Koreans (move · ) – Recognizable, natural, and concise name. Consistent with other names like British Chinese or British Indians. The current disambiguation page of the singular British Korean includes two non-existent pages and other phrases which need an additional qualifier (namely, "Relations"); it really isn't a proper disambiguation page. —Caorongjin 💬 10:40, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• George S. Vasey → George Vasey (currently a redirect instead to George Vasey (disambiguation)) (move · ) – The latter is a redirect created after a move. See the talk page of the former. Briefly, the name "George S. Vasey" was introduced sometime during the 20th century but the source of that name is unknown. In other words, the middle initial can not be verified. Tom Scavo (talk) 22:33, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Municipality of Balatan → Balatan, Camarines Sur (currently a redirect back to Municipality of Balatan) (move · ) – Per lack of objection at Special:PermanentLink/1276856997#Requested_move_18_February_2025 TarnishedPath^talk 00:48, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Greater Penang Conurbation → George Town Conurbation (currently a redirect back to Greater Penang Conurbation) (move · ) – As per suggestion from PenangLion in Talk:Greater Penang Conurbation#Several notes., and academic and official sources hundenvonPG (talk) 08:18, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Russian anti-LGBT law → Russian anti-LGBTQ law (currently a redirect back to Russian anti-LGBT law) (move · ) – Per consensus at Special:Permalink/1276348974#Requested move 16 February 2025. TarnishedPath^talk 12:12, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Clair Cameron Patterson → Clair Patterson (currently a redirect back to Clair Cameron Patterson) (move · ) – Per consensus at Special:Permalink/1277623419#Requested move 9 February 2025. TarnishedPath^talk 12:15, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Parore → Girella tricuspidata (currently a redirect back to Parore) (move · ) – Per consensus at Special:Permalink/1277312467#Requested move 16 February 2025. TarnishedPath^talk 12:19, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• European Grid Infrastructure (currently a redirect to European Grid Infrastructure (EGI)) → EGI (move · ) – The official name has changed to EGI. The old title could be misleading concerning the current scope of the organisation. Marchitelli (talk) 15:36, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  Oppose per WP:Article titles#Avoid ambiguous abbreviations. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 15:37, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• B-Boy (wrestler) → B-Boy (currently a redirect instead to B Boy) (move · ) – Unnecessary disambiguator. Most notable subject known simply as B-Boy. MimirIsSmart (talk) 00:39, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Title is the result of a 2021 RM. Such cases should not be brought to WP:RMT. See WP:PCM. 162 etc. (talk) 00:45, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Exosquad → ExoSquad (currently a redirect back to Exosquad) (move · ) – ExoSquad is the official spelling per the literature for the franchise. Jonny2x4 (talk) 14:23, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Jonny2x4 We use what reliable sources use, not offical names. Most, if not all, refs in article use current capitalization, any particular reason/source to change it? ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 16:31, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Jonny2x4 can you provide a reliable source for your confirmation? ROY is WAR Talk! 23:55, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delicious Party Pretty Cure → Delicious Party PreCure (currently a redirect back to Delicious Party Pretty Cure) (move · ) – There was a page move consensus on Talk:Wonderful PreCure! that this page and several other pages listed as "Pretty Cure" should be using the correct English title of "PreCure". Most of these moves have gone through okay but this one isn't able to move for some reason even though the new name has a redirect. Rebochan (talk) 17:55, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  Hi @Rebochan, you can't move a page over an existing one unless it's a single-revision redirect to the page being moved in its place, otherwise you are correct to ask here. For the record, @Cubching90's closure was slightly irregular as it is expected that a closer is able to carry out the actual moves, which they clearly can't. ASUKITE 20:39, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  I also note that this particular page wasn't listed in the RM in questions. Wouldn't WP:NOTOTHERPAGES apply? The closer was correct not to move this page as part of their close. Bensci54 (talk) 20:58, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  Correct, thanks! I hadn't even checked that part, this whole situation is fishy to me. ASUKITE 21:18, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  Actually, Cubching90 was blocked for sockpuppetry, I think that closure needs to be reverted, which means my move earlier might have been invalid as well. (Or... I don't know what to do, an admin should handle that as it looks like a couple other editors were blocked there, might be better even to just void the entire discussion and start over at this point) ASUKITE 21:19, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  The point of the discussion was that all of those pages are not using the correct names of the shows according to primary sources. These all should have been uncontroversial moves, but people fight them anyway. Now all of my moves trying to follow what I had no reason to believe was a bad faith closure have been reverted by Hey man im josh who scolded me for it on my talk page. Rebochan (talk) 23:00, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Rebochan Contested as recent activity shows there is controversy - after the related move is closed it may be possible to move this, but even then a discussion might be a good idea. ASUKITE 15:06, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Rebochan, I would suggest to discuss this on talk page. This is a controversy move and it needed a consensus on other editors. ROY is WAR Talk! 23:54, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Margot Isaacs, Marchioness of Reading → Margot Irene, Marchioness of Reading (move · ) – By lack of reference in obituaries e.g., The Independent, The Peerage, The Times which refer to her surname as either 'Duke' or the title of 'Reading' (as is traditional for British nobility) it does not appear she took the name of her husband and children. This is therefore likely an error. JJLiu112 (talk) 06:20, 22 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  In fact, we should probably do the formal thing and title the article with her forenames. --JJLiu112 (talk) 06:25, 22 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  Oppose; this request based on an assumption/misunderstanding by the user. If she took the title, she defintely took the surname too even if she didn't use it. The obits may just be refering to her pre-marital name OR her case is similar to Rose Hanbury who is better known by her maiden name. Since she is referred as "Lady Reading" or "Reading" in the articles post-marriage, then she definitely took her husband's name. Omnis Scientia (talk) 08:48, 22 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  Thank you very much for correcting me on this point. Still I wonder because I can see very little reference online to her being referred to as Margot Isaacs whether it would not be better to still correct the title with her forename(s) as above. JJLiu112 (talk) 02:42, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• List of Pakistan Air Force non-flying equipment → List of equipment of the Pakistan Air Force (currently a redirect back to List of Pakistan Air Force non-flying equipment) (move · ) – Undiscussed controversial move, restore previous title per WP:CONSISTENT see: Category:Lists of armies (air forces) equipment Ainty Painty (talk) 05:15, 24 February 2025 (UTC) Ainty Painty (talk) 05:15, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Executive magistrates of the Roman Republic → Magistrates of the Roman Republic (currently a redirect instead to Thomas Robert Shannon Broughton#Magistrates of the Roman Republic) (move · ) – See Talk:Executive magistrates of the Roman Republic#GA Reassessment under "Title". I agree with original poster. Target title is currently a redirect, it should be dropped. I've put in a {{for}} template on the original title page for disambiguation. Ifly6 (talk) 09:11, 21 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  This appears to be a contentious PTOPIC grab between a redirect to a marginally viewed article, with the potential for a different article with also very marginal view numbers. The referenced talk page discussion was from over 5 years ago and the article has been stable at the current title for a while. It would seem like a full RM discussion would be required, especially because it would impact not only this page, but also the current redirect as well. TiggerJay (talk) 05:29, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Ravaisson-Mollien (currently a redirect to Félix Ravaisson) → Félix Ravaisson-Mollien (currently a redirect instead to Félix Ravaisson) (move · ) – common name Xpander (talk) 10:34, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Xpander1 This page was recently moved, so this would be considered contentious, please start a full RM discussion by clicking discuss next to your request. TiggerJay (talk) 05:34, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Cyanagraea → Cyanagraea praedator (currently a redirect back to Cyanagraea) (move · ) – Cyanagraea is the name of the genus, not that of the species. The article is dedicated to the species, not the genus. This causes a translation problem: the French, Dutch and Cebuano articles are named "Cyanagraea praedator", and they cannot be linked to the English article because of that. Captaindory (talk) 12:02, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Captaindory The way this is set up is established enwiki practice. See WP:MONOTYPICFAUNA. I have fixed the Wikidata so that the enwiki article links to the species articles on other wikis rather than the genus article. Bensci54 (talk) 14:22, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Berar sultanate → Berar Sultanate (currently a redirect back to Berar sultanate) (move · ) – capitalization Prakashs27 (talk) 01:10, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  @Prakashs27 This has been discussed before here. You will need to open another discussion to gain consensus to move it back. Imcdc Contact 03:26, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• 2010 Australian Sports Sedan season → 2010 Kerrick Sports Sedan Series (currently a redirect back to 2010 Australian Sports Sedan season) (move · ) – The page is about a specific series rather than a "season". Please see National Sports Sedan Series GTHO (talk) 09:06, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  Before you changed it here it was about the season. When I look up "Australian Sports Sedan" in books, I got a lot of "Australian Sports Sedan Champtionship", but only lowercase "Australian sports sedan series", since there are series involving Australian sports sedans, but that's not their proper name. So it seems some discussion is in order on this one. Dicklyon (talk) 04:49, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]