Emma Ruttkamp-Bloem (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Despite major improvements since it was moved to mainspace I see nothing here to show she passes WP:NPROF in particular nor WP:BIO / WP:GNG more generally. I am unable to return it to draft unilaterally under WP:DRAFTOBJECT. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 17:12, 12 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• DELETE I checked all the criteria for WP:NPROF and I don't see how she meets them. At first glance this seems impressive but when I check her university page, despite being chair of philosophy department in humanities at University of Pretoria, I am not seeing anything like an endowed chair, chief editor of a major journal, any standout prizes or honors, and very few academic papers.--FeralOink (talk) 20:09, 12 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  Although not the chief editor, she is an Associate Editor Science and Engineering Ethics (Springer) 2021-

  I believe her inclusion in the list of 100 Brilliant women in AI ethics can be regarded as an honor.

  Can she assessed to check whether she passes WP:BLP?

  Thanks Etowusu (talk) 07:33, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Etowusu: I've reverted your move to draft, because you cannot move a page while it is subject to an AfD. Please do not move this page again. CycloneYoris ^talk! 08:21, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Academics and educators, Women, Philosophy, South Africa, and Finland. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 17:12, 12 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep: H-index of 6 is pretty low even in a low-citation field like psychology, and I can't find any GNG. However I think she could meet WP:NACADEMIC C3 via full membership in the International Academy for the Philosophy of Science (AIPS).[1] InsomniaOpossum (talk) 00:03, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Soft delete: Not enough impact for C1 of WP:NPROF. The 100 brilliant women award does not satisfy C2. C3 is closer; I confess that I had never heard of the IAPS, but it looks like it was founded by a group of giants in this field and its members are elected (see here). However, I cannot determine whether or not membership is truly prestigious, and I see that she is a corresponding member - that may not be as prestigious as being a full member. Since I can't tell, I am using it as one indicator of academic notability but not as fully satisfying it. C4-C6 don't apply. Her work for UNESCO and for GC REAIM indicate at least partial satisfaction of C7 of WP:NPROF but I think it's not enough. Editorial board membership, or service as an associate editor, is not the same as actually being the editor and does not satisfy C8. I think this is a strong faculty member but I am not yet seeing their work as being broadly impactful in the field. Perhaps in 5-10 years the situation will be different on one or more of the criteria, and I think that if the page is deleted it should be done "softly." Qflib (talk) 19:05, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Just double-checked because I thought I remembered she was listed as a full member in AIPS, and we're both right because there's a discrepancy: her profile on the AIPS website says she corresponding, but the AIPS membership list says full. I can't find any reliable independent sources which could clarify one way or the other. For what it's worth, it looks like corresponding members are non-voting but elected in the same fashion. InsomniaOpossum (talk) 22:38, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment: Just wanted to note that the page was moved to draftspace by the author while this AfD was ongoing. I've reverted their move and restored the article's original title. CycloneYoris ^talk! 08:27, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:24, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]