This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Canada Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Books This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook Animal rights Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animal rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of animal rights on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Animal rightsWikipedia:WikiProject Animal rightsTemplate:WikiProject Animal rightsAnimal rights Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

• ... that The Chimps of Fauna Sanctuary describes the lab conditions chimpanzees endure in modern biomedical research.

• Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Slade Heathcott

Created/expanded by My76Strat (talk). Self nom at 19:39, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• As it stands, this is a bit short. I make it 1128 characters of non-quoted text, whereas 1500 characters are needed. Otherwise, seems okay. --Epipelagic (talk) 22:21, 25 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• I agree, that was my error. I forgot to discount quoted text. I could add content but that wouldn't make it qualified within the first five days. I think it would be best to withdraw this nomination in favor of the nominations that did meet the criteria when nominated. Thanks for the review. My76Strat (talk) 23:40, 25 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Issues with article, nomination withdrawn by nominator Moswento ^talky 12:05, 4 December 2012 (UTC)}}[reply]