Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: RodRabelo7 (talk · contribs) 12:32, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Chiswick Chap (talk · contribs) 15:48, 12 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A tightly-constructed and well-cited article on a small but well-defined subject.

• The article is clearly written.

• The 'Background' (I'd have called it 'Context') contextualises the material well, briefly but efficiently traversing the earlier history of European documentation of Old Tupi.

• The named tree Spondias tuberosa needs a gloss, "imbu or Brazil plum". I've boldly added this as it's non-controversial.

• I've done some very light copy-editing for use of English.

• Earwig finds any copyvio unlikely.

• The images are well-chosen, necessary, and precisely illustrate the subject.

• All the images are Public Domain by reason of their age and are on Commons, appropriately licensed.

• The article is fully cited to reliable sources.

• The sources are neatly arranged and fully documented.

• The author Rodolfo Garcia is redlinked; I guess there is some hope that somebody might write his article; perhaps nom intends to do that.

• The sources I've spot-checked seem to verify the claims made.

• This short article seems to me to be exactly what we need more of on Wikipedia, clear, informative, neutral, reliable. I'm happy to pass it as a Good Article now. Chiswick Chap (talk) 16:11, 12 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]