This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Forestry, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.ForestryWikipedia:WikiProject ForestryTemplate:WikiProject ForestryForestry
This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project, participate in relevant discussions, and see lists of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 17:11, February 24, 2025 (JST, Reiwa 7) (Refresh)JapanWikipedia:WikiProject JapanTemplate:WikiProject JapanJapan-related
This article is part of WikiProject Vietnam, an attempt to create a comprehensive, neutral, and accurate representation of Vietnam on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.VietnamWikipedia:WikiProject VietnamTemplate:WikiProject VietnamVietnam
This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Climate change, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Climate change on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Climate changeWikipedia:WikiProject Climate changeTemplate:WikiProject Climate changeClimate change
If you are looking for ways to improve this article, we recommend checking out our recommended sources and our style guide
Image is broken?
So I was just reading the article and found an image of a giant panda eating bamboo that was covering up part of the text at the beginning of the "Cultivation" section. Any idea what is going on? TypoEater (talk) 15:27, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Subfamily
I dont understand, why bamboo is a subfamily within grass family, rather than a family in their own right?
I initially thought the bamboo was an independent family. When i see this wikipedia page for the first time, it turned out to be subfamily within poaceae family.
I cannot explain the reason to place bamboo as a subfamily.
By the way what is the proposed bamboo name as a family?
The word bambusoideae makes me irritating like minding a kitten, but sorry this is my petty joke.
This is pretty irritating that the bamboo should not be subfamily within grass family, but a family of its own right.
So i hope someone can understand this situation.
2404:8000:1027:2C72:74F0:C69D:711B:25F9 (talk) 16:33, 13 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The article states "The commercially important bamboo Guadua, or Cana brava (Guadua angustifolia) bloomed for the first time in recorded history in 1971, suggesting a blooming interval well in excess of 130 years."
Somebody already pointed out that there is no citation for this fact, but I would like to add that it seems implausible
If it only flowers every hundred years wouldn't most of the bamboo trees be gone? How can it be commercially important if it flowers less than once a century?
Wiki Education assignment: Principles of Biology 2
This article is currently the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 28 January 2025 and 9 May 2025. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Pollen.dream (article contribs).