February 16
Category:Arts in Korea categories
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: withdrawn (non-admin closure) Marcocapelle (talk) 07:01, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
- Propose renaming Category:Arts in Silla to Category:Arts of Silla
- Propose renaming Category:Arts in Joseon to Category:Arts of Joseon
- Propose renaming Category:Arts in Baekje to Category:Arts of Baekje
- Nominator's rationale: Not sure of best title; these are Koreanic countries that no longer exist. "Arts in x" may imply they are extant? See also Category:Arts by country, which is for extant countries and uses all "Arts of x" format. seefooddiet (talk) 22:40, 16 February 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose All the subcategories of Category:Arts by former country use "Arts in Foo". –Aidan721 (talk) 13:52, 17 February 2025 (UTC)
- Ah good point, I missed that. I retract the nominations. seefooddiet (talk) 00:37, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Relations of colonizer and former colony
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2025 February 24#Category:Relations of colonizer and former colony
Category:2019 Pan American Games event navigational boxes
- Propose renaming Category:2019 Pan American Games event navigational boxes ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs) to Category:2019 Pan American Games event sidebar templates
- Propose renaming Category:Pan American Games by year event navigational boxes ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs) to Category:Pan American Games by year event sidebar templates
- Nominator's rationale: All templates are sidebar templates, not navboxes. Rename per content. –Aidan721 (talk) 17:32, 16 February 2025 (UTC)
- Delete Category:Pan American Games by year event navigational boxes as containing only the other nominated category. Rename the other one per nom. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 01:02, 24 February 2025 (UTC)
- Delete and rename per LaundryPizza03. it's lio! | talk | work 08:06, 24 February 2025 (UTC)
Category:Books by Dwight D. Eisenhower
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: merge to Category:Works by Dwight D. Eisenhower. The article is already in Category:Books written by presidents of the United States, so the question is irrelevant. (non-admin closure) –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 00:53, 24 February 2025 (UTC)
- Propose merging Category:Books by Dwight D. Eisenhower to Category:Works by Dwight D. Eisenhower
- Nominator's rationale: Only contains one article. (Oinkers42) (talk) 17:00, 16 February 2025 (UTC)
- Merge per nom. Should it also be merged to Category:Books written by presidents of the United States? Eisenhower was not president yet when he wrote it, so this is an open question. Marcocapelle (talk) 17:36, 16 February 2025 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Books by Ulysses S. Grant
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: merge to Category:Works by Ulysses S. Grant and Category:Books written by presidents of the United States. (non-admin closure) –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 00:52, 24 February 2025 (UTC)
- Propose merging Category:Books by Ulysses S. Grant to Category:Works by Ulysses S. Grant
- Nominator's rationale: Only contains one article. (Oinkers42) (talk) 16:45, 16 February 2025 (UTC)
- Dual merge to Category:Books written by presidents of the United States as well (actually not technically needed since it is tagged with {{all included}}). Not useful to diffuse by type of work here. –Aidan721 (talk) 16:56, 16 February 2025 (UTC)
- Dual merge per above. Marcocapelle (talk) 17:38, 16 February 2025 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:July 1852 in the United Kingdom
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: delete (non-admin closure). –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 00:54, 24 February 2025 (UTC)
- Propose merging Category:July 1852 in the United Kingdom ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs) to Category:July 1852
- Propose deleting Category:1852 in the United Kingdom by month ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Propose deleting Category:1852 in Europe by month ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Propose deleting Category:July 1852 in Europe ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Propose deleting Category:July 1852 by continent ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Propose deleting Category:July 1852 by country ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Nominator's rationale: This is the only pre-1900 category in this tree. Not useful for navigation. Don't need to merge to a 2nd target b/c they are already in that tree. –Aidan721 (talk) 16:22, 16 February 2025 (UTC)
- Merge/delete per nom. Marcocapelle (talk) 17:39, 16 February 2025 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
20th-century months in New Zealand
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: merge (non-admin closure). –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 00:55, 24 February 2025 (UTC)
- Propose merging Category:October 1923 in New Zealand to Category:October 1923 in Oceania
- Propose merging Category:April 1940 in New Zealand to Category:April 1940 in Oceania
- Propose merging Category:May 1940 in New Zealand to Category:May 1940 in Oceania
- Propose merging Category:September 1940 in New Zealand to Category:September 1940 in Oceania
- Propose merging Category:November 1940 in New Zealand to Category:November 1940 in Oceania
- Propose merging Category:May 1941 in New Zealand to Category:May 1941 in Oceania
- Propose merging Category:July 1941 in New Zealand to Category:July 1941 in Oceania
- Propose merging Category:December 1941 in New Zealand to Category:December 1941 in Oceania
- Nominator's rationale: Mostly isolated categories. Not useful for navigation. WP:NARROW. Merging to "Year in New Zealand" is not always necessary because the article(s) are already in subcategories. –Aidan721 (talk) 15:06, 16 February 2025 (UTC)
- Merge per nom. Marcocapelle (talk) 17:40, 16 February 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose:
(except for 1923, which I did not create). These categories are not isolated but are part of series with Australia in Oceania; and as creator of the category I was not notified. Hugo999 (talk) 20:59, 21 February 2025 (UTC)
- After the merge the articles are still in Oceania. Marcocapelle (talk) 07:10, 22 February 2025 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Early mass media introductions
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: merge (non-admin closure). –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 00:54, 24 February 2025 (UTC)
- Propose merging Category:Mass media franchises introduced in the 1670s to Category:1670s introductions
- Propose merging Category:Mass media franchises introduced in the 1680s to Category:1680s introductions
- Propose merging Category:Mass media franchises introduced in the 1700s to Category:1700s introductions
- Propose merging Category:Mass media franchises introduced in the 1710s to Category:1710s introductions
- Propose merging Category:Mass media franchises introduced in the 1720s to Category:1720s introductions
- Propose merging Category:Mass media franchises introduced in the 1730s to Category:1730s introductions
- Propose merging Category:Mass media franchises introduced in the 1740s to Category:1740s introductions
- Propose merging Category:Mass media franchises introduced in the 1750s to Category:1750s introductions
- Propose merging Category:Mass media franchises introduced in the 1760s to Category:1760s introductions
- Propose merging Category:Mass media franchises introduced in the 1770s to Category:1770s introductions
- Propose merging Category:Mass media franchises introduced in the 1780s to Category:1780s introductions
- Propose merging Category:Mass media franchises introduced in the 1790s to Category:1790s introductions
- Propose merging Category:Mass media franchises introduced in the 1800s to Category:1800s introductions
- Propose merging Category:Mass media franchises introduced in the 1810s to Category:1810s introductions
- Propose merging Category:Mass media franchises introduced in the 1820s to Category:1820s introductions
- Propose merging Category:Mass media franchises introduced in the 1830s to Category:1830s introductions
- Propose merging Category:Mass media franchises introduced in the 1840s to Category:1840s introductions
- Propose merging Category:Mass media franchises introduced in the 1850s to Category:1850s introductions
- Propose merging Category:Mass media franchises introduced in the 1860s to Category:1860s introductions
- Propose merging Category:Mass media franchises introduced in the 1870s to Category:1870s introductions
- Propose merging Category:Mass media franchises introduced in the 1880s to Category:1880s introductions
- Propose merging Category:Mass media franchises introduced in 1878 to Category:1878 introductions
- Propose merging Category:Mass media franchises introduced in 1880 to Category:1880 introductions
- Nominator's rationale: merge, this is too early for mass media diffusion, these categories each contain only a books series subcategory. Marcocapelle (talk) 14:40, 16 February 2025 (UTC)
- Merge. Redundant category layer. –Aidan721 (talk) 15:10, 16 February 2025 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Films by year of setting
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2025 February 25#Films by year of setting
Category:People from Barnard, Vermont
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: merge (non-admin closure). –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 01:00, 24 February 2025 (UTC)
- Nominator's rationale: Category with just two entries. Lost in Quebec (talk) 11:41, 16 February 2025 (UTC)
- Merge per nom. Marcocapelle (talk) 13:45, 16 February 2025 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:United States government navigational boxes
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: merge/rename. (non-admin closure) –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 00:59, 24 February 2025 (UTC)
- Nominator's rationale: For consistency with the established category tree under Category:Politics and government templates by country.The renaming part fits the speedy criterion WP:C2C, but since another category is involved, I decided to take this to CfD. Instead of a full discussion, I could have just nominated for a speedy renaming and then turned Category:United States government navigational boxes into a {{category redirect}}. —andrybak (talk) 08:10, 16 February 2025 (UTC)
- AGREE. ok, yes, agree with rename. Sm8900 (talk) 20:10, 17 February 2025 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Naval battles of the Napoleonic Wars involving France
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: merge. (non-admin closure) –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 00:56, 24 February 2025 (UTC)
- Propose manually merging Category:Naval battles of the Napoleonic Wars involving France to Category:Naval battles of the Napoleonic Wars
- Nominator's rationale: manually merge, France was always involved in Napoleonic Wars, this is a meaningless diffusion. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:57, 16 February 2025 (UTC)
- agree as per Nom. Sm8900 (talk) 20:10, 17 February 2025 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Combat occupations of the early modern period
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: merge (non-admin closure). –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 00:55, 24 February 2025 (UTC)
- Nominator's rationale: Vague and nondefining SMasonGarrison 04:53, 16 February 2025 (UTC)
- Merge, conceptually there is nothing vague about it, but the category has been populated with articles that are not specifically about the early modern period. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:17, 16 February 2025 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:18th-century Welsh slave traders
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: merge (non-admin closure). –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 00:57, 24 February 2025 (UTC)
- Nominator's rationale: Upmerge for now. isolated category SMasonGarrison 04:38, 16 February 2025 (UTC)
- Dual merge per nom. Both articles are already in Category:18th-century British slave traders so this isn"t needed as a third merge target. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:35, 16 February 2025 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Naval battles of the Thirty Years' War involving Portugal
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: merge to Category:Naval battles involving Portugal. (non-admin closure) –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 00:57, 24 February 2025 (UTC)
- Nominator's rationale: Underpopulated uomerge for now SMasonGarrison 03:22, 16 February 2025 (UTC)
- Single merge to Category:Naval battles involving Portugal, the article is already in Category:Naval battles of the Eighty Years' War (80, not 30!). Marcocapelle (talk) 06:42, 16 February 2025 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Naval battles of the French Revolutionary Wars involving Portugal
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: delete (non-admin closure). –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 00:57, 24 February 2025 (UTC)
- Nominator's rationale: Duel upmerge this underpopulated category SMasonGarrison 03:20, 16 February 2025 (UTC)
- Was Portugal involved in the Second Battle of Algeciras at all? Marcocapelle (talk) 06:46, 16 February 2025 (UTC)
- Delete (or else merge per nom), not a defining characteristic of the only article in the category. Marcocapelle (talk) 07:12, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:19th-century Royal Dano-Norwegian Navy admirals
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: merge (non-admin closure). –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 00:58, 24 February 2025 (UTC)
- Propose merging Category:19th-century Royal Dano-Norwegian Navy admirals to Category:19th-century Royal Dano-Norwegian Navy officers and Category:Royal Dano-Norwegian Navy admirals
- Propose merging Category:16th-century Royal Dano-Norwegian Navy admirals to Category:16th-century Royal Dano-Norwegian Navy officers and Category:Royal Dano-Norwegian Navy admirals
- Propose merging Category:18th-century Royal Dano-Norwegian Navy admirals to Category:18th-century Royal Dano-Norwegian Navy officers and Category:Royal Dano-Norwegian Navy admirals
- Propose merging Category:17th-century Royal Dano-Norwegian Navy admirals to Category:17th-century Royal Dano-Norwegian Navy admirals and Category:Royal Dano-Norwegian Navy admirals
- Propose merging Category:20th-century Royal Norwegian Navy admirals to Category:20th-century Royal Norwegian Navy admirals
- Propose merging Category:19th-century Royal Norwegian Navy admirals to Category:Royal Norwegian Navy admirals
- Propose merging Category:21st-century Royal Norwegian Navy admirals to Category:Royal Norwegian Navy admirals
- Nominator's rationale: There's no need to diffuse this category by century. Notably, there's not a Navy admirals by century tree SMasonGarrison 03:11, 16 February 2025 (UTC)
- Merge per nom. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:47, 16 February 2025 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Naval battles of the Napoleonic Wars involving Portugal
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: merge to Category:Naval battles involving Portugal. (non-admin closure) –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 00:58, 24 February 2025 (UTC)
- Nominator's rationale: Only one page in this category which isn't helpful for navigation SMasonGarrison 03:13, 16 February 2025 (UTC)
- Single merge to Category:Naval battles involving Portugal, the article is already in Category:Naval battles of the Napoleonic Wars involving Spain. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:52, 16 February 2025 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Ibrahim Rugova
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: delete (non-admin closure). –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 00:58, 24 February 2025 (UTC)
- Propose deleting Category:Ibrahim Rugova ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Nominator's rationale: This category only has two pages in it that are already interlinked. Delete for now as this doesn't help navigaiton SMasonGarrison 02:47, 16 February 2025 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:59, 16 February 2025 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.