a	b	c	d	e	f	g	h
8									8
7									7
6									6
5									5
4									4
3									3
2									2
1									1
	a	b	c	d	e	f	g	h

White to move, so it's leeky's turn – check back later! (last mover: CopperyMarrow15)

Sometimes messages slip through the cracks. Sorry about that! I keep this list to let me know what I still need to respond to – feel free to add your own name and message here if you're still looking for a response from me.

1. 13:21, 31 October 2024 – TheNuggeteer
2. 00:32, 3 January 2025 – BusterD
3. 05:04, 17 February 2025 (UTC) fill out your thing at WP:REFLECTIONS – HouseBlaster (talk • he/they)

Could you please provide further clarification on why my article was deleted? I dedicated significant time to ensuring that it adhered to a neutral point of view and met Wikipedia’s content guidelines. I would appreciate specific feedback so I can address any concerns appropriately. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 404hugo (talk • contribs) 21:26, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@404hugo: I think you've gotten a bit tripped up! No worries, it's a bit confusing to follow. You wrote a page at 123 Management & co, which was moved to 123 Management & Co. by CycloneYoris and then moved to this draft page, where you can still work on it, by Velella :) I just did some cleanup after the page moves. As to why it was draftified, I think you need to show that the article meets the notability guideline for organizations – you need to find multiple sources that are independent of 123 Management, editorially controlled and fact-checked, and provide significant coverage of the subject. If you can find and add those sources, the article would pass the notability guideline. theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 21:34, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the clarification! I appreciate the cleanup work you've done. I understand now that the article was moved to draft space because more independent sources are needed to demonstrate notability. I will focus on finding and adding reliable, third-party sources that provide significant coverage of 123 Management & Co. to meet the notability guidelines. Thanks again for your guidance, and I’ll work on improving the article to ensure it meets Wikipedia's standards. 404hugo (talk) 21:46, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have some concerns, I am ready to assist on anything today but I have a major problem, when I was trying to mark the List of Pretty Cure Max Heart episodes page for speedy deletion due to an already existing one being used I was trying to put the templates in and (accidentally) put the C5D template to mark for speedy deletion alongside the a10 template however idk if the page was done by the sock master itself …and idk if it might conflict the template's rules. Any advice can be appreciated… VenezuelanSpongeBobFan2004 (talk) 02:53, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, @VenezuelanSpongeBobFan2004! I've deleted per A10; it doesn't qualify for G5 unless it's specifically block evasion (i.e. sock of an an already-blocked master). I, uh... why is the article currently at that title? That's a pretty nasty title. theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 04:28, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The user at that point had to move to this page since it was trying to redirect to the main PCMH episode page (without the words of the show's JP name) but things went horribly wrong and managed to break the redirect to copy the entire thing. VenezuelanSpongeBobFan2004 (talk) 04:49, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for improving article quality in February! - I pointed at a composer yesterday, as the main page had. -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 00:08, 21 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

... and a soprano today whose performance impressed me. (didn't notice that a new day had begun) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:47, 21 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]