This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

India: Assam Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Assam (assessed as High-importance). Military history: National / Asian / Indian / South Asia This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history Associated task forces: /  National militaries task force Asian military history task force Indian military history task force South Asian military history task force

This review is transcluded from Talk:Battle of Bharali (1615)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Garudam (talk · contribs) 21:36, 2 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Matarisvan (talk · contribs) 07:37, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Garudam, my comments:

• The infobox image is not necessary. I have removed it.
• How do we know the exact co-ordinates of the battle? We can say the co-ordinates mark the mouth of the Bharali river.
• "While the Naga tribes of present-day Nagaland accepted Ahom suzerainty, they did not pay tribute. Assam was renowned for its elephants, gold, silk, and its principal crops—rice and betel leaves.[5]": These details are not relevant at all to this article. Please remove them.
• There were many unnecessary images. I have removed them. Please remember that you should add only relevant images. If this was a Featured Article nomination, it would have been failed because of the multiple irrelevant images.
• Remember to use pp. when citing more than one page.

I will post my other comments soon. Cheers Matarisvan (talk) 07:37, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for picking this to review, Matarisvan. You're right -- the infobox image is redundant or, rather, irrelevant. The battle was basically fought somewhere around the river, so I'm also unsure whether one should still pin the coordinates of the riverside or simply omit them. I've taken care of the other extraneous details and noted the pp point. Thanks for copyediting and handling the unnecessary images -- I'll heed your advice regarding this. – Garuda ^Talk! 14:26, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Garudam, one prose comment before we do the image and source reviews: What is the connection between the battle/skirmish at Pandu and the battle of Bharali? You say the former occurred in 1606, and the latter occurred in 1615. If the latter was a continuation of the former battle, then we should clarify that. If not, we should remove that infomration. Matarisvan (talk) 17:48, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]