Archives

Archive 1 May 2007 to Jan 2008 Archive 2 Jan to April 2008 Archive 3 April to 15 May 2008 Archive 4 15 May to 30 June 2008 Archive 5 1 July 2008 to 26 August 2008 Archive 6 27 August 2008 to 10 October 2008 Archive 7 11 October 2008 to 13 January 2009 Archive 8 14 January 2009 to 26 February 2009 Archive 9 27 February 2009 to 9 April 2009 Archive 10 6 April 2009 to 1 June 2009 Archive 11 2 June 2009 to 25 August 2009 Archive 12 24 August 2009 to 14 November 2009 Archive 13 14 November to 8 January 2010 Archive 14 8 January 2010 to 19 February 2010 Archive 15 18 February 2010 to 22 July 2010 Archive 16 29 July 2010 to 23 October 2010 Archive 17 22 October 2010 to 22 December 2010 Archive 18 22 December 2010 to 12 March 2011 Archive 19 9 March 2011 to 18 May 2011 Archive 20 19 May 2011 to 21 July 2011 Archive 21 20 July 2011 to 18 October 2011 Archive 22 18 October 2011 to 26 December 2011 Archive 23 27 December 2011 to 27 January 2012 Archive 24 27 January 2012 to 31 March 2012 Archive 25 31 March 2012 to 5 June 2012 Archive 26 7 June 2012 to 1 September 2012 Archive 27 4 September 2012 to 29 November 2012 Archive 28 30 November 2012 to 1 February 2013 Archive 29 2 February 2013 to 15 April 2013 Archive 30 15 April 2013 to 4 June 2013 Archive 31 28 May 2013 to 2 July 2013 Archive 32 Archive 33 Archive 34 Archive 35 Archive 36 Archive 37 Archive 38 Archive 39 Archive 40 Archive 41 Archive 42 Archive 43 Archive 44 Archive 45 Archive 46 Archive 47 Archive 48 Archive 49 Archive 50 Archive 51 Archive 52 Archive 53 Archive 54 Archive 55 Archive 56 Archive 57 Archive 58 Archive 59 Archive 60 Archive 61 Archive 62 Archive 63 Archive 64 Archive 65 Archive 66 Archive 67 Archive 68 Archive 69 Archive 70 Archive 71 Archive 72 Archive 73 Archive 74 Archive 75 Archive 76 Archive 77 Archive 78 Archive 79 Archive 80

This page has archives. Sections older than 21 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.

The fourth round of the competition has finished, with anyone scoring less than 673 points being eliminated. It was a high scoring round with all but one of the contestants who progressed to the final having achieved an FA during the round. The highest scorers were

• Epicgenius, with 2173 points topping the scores, gained mainly from a featured article, 38 good articles and 9 DYKs. He was followed by
• Sammi Brie, with 1575 points, gained mainly from a featured article, 28 good articles and 50 good article reviews. Close behind was
• Thebiguglyalien, with 1535 points mainly gained from a featured article, 15 good articles, 26 good article reviews and lots of bonus points.

Between them during round 4, contestants achieved 12 featured articles, 3 featured lists, 3 featured pictures, 126 good articles, 46 DYK entries, 14 ITN entries, 67 featured article candidate reviews and 147 good article reviews. Congratulations to our eight finalists and all who participated! It was a generally high-scoring and productive round and I think we can expect a highly competitive finish to the competition.

Remember that any content promoted after the end of round 4 but before the start of round 5 can be claimed in round 5. Remember too that you must claim your points within 10 days of "earning" them and within 24 hours of the end of the final. If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. It would be helpful if this list could be cleared of any items no longer relevant. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send.

I will be standing down as a judge after the end of the contest. I think the Cup encourages productive editors to improve their contributions to Wikipedia and I hope that someone else will step up to take over the running of the Cup. Sturmvogel 66 (talk), and Cwmhiraeth (talk)

Welcome, welcome, welcome Ealdgyth! I'm glad that you are joining the drive! Please, have a cup of WikiTea, and go cite some articles.

CactiStaccingCrane (talk)18:46, 1 February 2024 UTC [refresh]via JWB and Geardona (talk to me?)

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Tagged with…
2,760		Disney+ Hotstar (talk)	Add sources
475		Henry the Young King (talk)	Add sources
32		Basset family (talk)	Add sources
14		Sibyl de Neufmarché (talk)	Add sources
43		Hamelin de Warenne, Earl of Surrey (talk)	Add sources
3,122		Rajya Sabha (talk)	Add sources
7		Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Pretoria (talk)	Cleanup
32		Trevor Martin (talk)	Cleanup
40		Darius Boyd (talk)	Cleanup
284		Syrian Revolution (talk)	Expand
833		Armed factions in the Syrian civil war (talk)	Expand
11,989		Syrian civil war (talk)	Expand
1,425		Tallulah Bankhead (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
663		Companion (Doctor Who) (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
222		Ravens of the Tower of London (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
23		Modal fallacy (talk)	Merge
8		Proterra (album) (talk)	Merge
14		SDSS J1228+1040 b (talk)	Merge
1,377		Quds Force (talk)	Wikify
2		Suleiman Danladi (talk)	Wikify
3		Brymbo Institute Cricket and Football Club (talk)	Wikify
4		Abu Farwa (talk)	Orphan
2		Badnawar (Dewas district) (talk)	Orphan
3		Boione (talk)	Orphan
9		Anund from Russia (talk)	Stub
8		Robert Ling Kui Ee (talk)	Stub
94		Pasadena Jewish Temple and Center (talk)	Stub
7		The Costello School (talk)	Stub
4		Wan Sukairi Wan Abdullah (talk)	Stub
15		Ahmad Yunus Hairi (talk)	Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:26, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Ealdgyth I was wondering if I could get your opinion on the change to Edward Hull (knight) at 06:58, 19 February 2025. The user removed the post nominals,stating they did so as per MOS. I looked at MOS and it appears that home country post nominals can be included? Am I correct or am I incorrect. Regards Newm30 (talk) 04:36, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Well, this is complicated by the fact that the editor in question got indefinitely blocked for disruptive editing soon after making the edit you asked about, so that probably means you could restore based on the disruptiveness. On the other hand, I'm not seeing anything in MOS:POSTNOM that allows for any postnoms in the lead sentence - but then we have the "under discussion" tag on that bit of MOS so it's not sure if it's going to stick around. I'll tell you my own opinion (which isn't very strong or I'd be involved in the MOS discussion) is that as a non-Brit, postnoms are silly looking and annoying and tend to give too much prominence to arcane aspects of the British honours system. Frankly, I'd eliminate all the gratitous "sir/dame"s from our articles as well as the "honorific" sections of infoboxes but I know a losing fight when I see it so I stay out of that. In short - you can probably restore them but frankly, it's a silly system and the rest of the world has little knowledge of them and is usually just confused by the insistence some folks have in strewing articles with them. Ealdgyth (talk) 13:32, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks and understand your opinion and position. Regards Newm30 (talk) 05:19, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

(watching:) I think that our MoS tries to keep the lead concise, so - whatever the outcome of the discussion - I'd not put honorifics into the lead sentence. In the infobox, where people don't read from left to right but look where they expect the answer to what they want to know, they'd be less distracting, and might even be what someone wants to know. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:46, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Noted Newm30 (talk) 05:19, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Tagged with…
34		Waleran de Beaumont, 1st Earl of Worcester (talk)	Add sources
62		Earl of Surrey (talk)	Add sources
46		Ranulf de Blondeville, 6th Earl of Chester (talk)	Add sources
32		Odo, Count of Penthièvre (talk)	Add sources
14		Integrated Architecture Framework (talk)	Add sources
16		Alice de Warenne, Countess of Arundel (talk)	Add sources
95		Robert de Brus, 1st Lord of Annandale (talk)	Cleanup
330		Robert de Brus, 6th Lord of Annandale (talk)	Cleanup
33		Richard Scrope (bishop) (talk)	Cleanup
17		History of Murcia (talk)	Expand
83		Imperator totius Hispaniae (talk)	Expand
4		1177 in Ireland (talk)	Expand
4		Manor of Shirwell (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
6		Whitechapel, Bishops Nympton (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
8		Hall, Bishop's Tawton (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
127		Isabel de Clare, 4th Countess of Pembroke (talk)	Merge
3		National Security Advisor (Sri Lanka) (talk)	Merge
308		Virtual band (talk)	Merge
39		Geoffrey II, Count of Anjou (talk)	Wikify
6		Hugh I, Count of Dammartin (talk)	Wikify
4		Odo, Count of Dammartin (talk)	Wikify
2		John I de Vaux of Dirleton (talk)	Orphan
3		Thomas de Canville (talk)	Orphan
2		Roger Devereux of Norfolk (talk)	Orphan
73		Neil Bell (actor) (talk)	Stub
26		William d'Aubigny, 3rd Earl of Arundel (talk)	Stub
4		Hugh of Eu (talk)	Stub
20		Raoul II of Tosny (talk)	Stub
14		Henry Grey, 2nd Earl of Tankerville (talk)	Stub
29		Billecart-Salmon (talk)	Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:52, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]