This  level-4 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Military history: National This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history Associated task forces: /  National militaries task force Law Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Human rights Top‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Human rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Human rights on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Human rightsWikipedia:WikiProject Human rightsTemplate:WikiProject Human rightsHuman rights Top This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale. Politics Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. International relations: Law High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject International law (assessed as Top-importance). Switzerland Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Switzerland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Switzerland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SwitzerlandWikipedia:WikiProject SwitzerlandTemplate:WikiProject SwitzerlandSwitzerland Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

The word convention can mean

• An event, usually a gathering of people interested in a particular topic
• A treaty
• A peremptory norm in customary international law
• A standard way of doing things.

Given this ambiguity, I suggest this article avoid using the term outside of proper nouns. This will make statements like

• the agreements of 1949... updated the terms of the two 1929 treaties and added two new conventions (New peremptory norms, or new treaties?)
• The first convention dealt with the treatment of wounded and sick armed forces in the field. (The first conference event or treaty?)

While I recognize that the word "convention" most commonly means "treaty" in the context of the Geneva Conventions, even this article cannot avoid other meanings, as in the Military Commissions Act of 2009 quoted as ... Article 3 continues the conventional practice... of according humanitarian protections only to... Since we are expected to understand the "convention" means "treaty" nearly everywhere else in this article, we might expect that this means that Article 3 continues the practice common to the Geneva Conventions, or to international treaties generally. However, the reference here is to what is normative more broadly (A standard way of doing things), including both international treaties and military law.

I regard the term "convention" as a likely source of confusion for readers of this article and suggest it be avoided where possible. Daask (talk) 19:47, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Geneva suggestions has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 March 14 § Geneva suggestions until a consensus is reached. Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 21:48, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]