Content on cyberwarfare and nuclear war

I removed some content from Stuxnet on cyberwarfare and nuclear war. I'm not sure where it belongs. It is sourced and noteworthy, but off-topic in the Stuxnet article. Daask (talk) 14:05, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Section on Saudi Arabia

The section on Saudi Arabia is terrible and needs a major rewrite. For example, it says, "New hard drives were required as quickly as possible so oil prices were not affected by speculation." Why would acquiring new hard drives insulate oil prices from speculation? As another example, it uses the uncommon term "pastie" without explaining what that is. (Some kind of post on PasteBin, I assume?) As another example, it never explains how the attack was resolved even though it took place well over a decade ago and thus has presumably been resolved. I hope that someone who knows about this topic (certainly not me) can fix this section. 2603:7000:3400:69F6:D073:D708:BF6D:F1BD (talk) 04:21, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Cyber cold war has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 February 9 § Cyber cold war until a consensus is reached. 1234qwer1234qwer4 02:59, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Clickskrieg has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 February 9 § Clickskrieg until a consensus is reached. 1234qwer1234qwer4 03:01, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No tags for this post.