The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.‎

The result was delete. Cbrown1023 talk 19:33, 27 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

PJ Black (wrestler) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Non-notable wrestler from a non-notable organization. This pages has pretty much no information. iMatthew 2008 17:56, 20 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions. —♥Nici♥Vampire♥Heart♥ 18:12, 20 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - I couldn't find any independent sources. ♥Nici♥Vampire♥Heart♥ 18:20, 20 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment I disagree with the assumption that the organization is not notable. The World Wrestling Professionals appears to be a popular wrestling organization in South Africa that airs on SABC 2. I would do some research, first, before making bold statements that the wrestler and organization are automatically not notable. WP:IDONTKNOWIT is not a viable excuse. SashaNein (talk) 19:15, 20 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please see the previous AfD for World Wrestling Professionals. iMatthew 2008 19:51, 20 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I see a nominated AfD that was closed as keep. This does not help your generalization that the organization is not notable. SashaNein (talk) 01:13, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The AfD was only kept because it the nominator added every title, superstar, venue, and associated buiseness to the AfD. There were too many articles in the AfD and it needed to be broken down, which is what I am doing. iMatthew 2008 01:33, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, Whether or not the promotion is notable, this individual wrestler is not. There are no third party references to expand the article, verify the information, or to help prove notability. Sorry. Delete. Nikki311 19:57, 20 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom, and although previous AfD closed as keep it was with no prejudice to latter AfDs. Darrenhusted (talk) 10:45, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 14:11, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per lack of notability. _(1 == 2)^Until 13:49, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete No notability, per WP:N. Gary King (talk) 20:15, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.