Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lizzie Waterworth

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America1000 22:40, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Lizzie Waterworth (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I for the life of me can't understand how this article's been up for 8 years in the state it's in!, Anyway there's not one source in the article and unfortunately I can't find any either, Fails NACTOR & GNG –Davey2010Talk 22:38, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89(T·E·C) 02:43, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89(T·E·C) 02:43, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89(T·E·C) 02:43, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete for now preferably rather than say redirect to Horrid Henry which seems to have the most episodes because I'm familiar with all these shows but her bio is vulnerable to BLP issues and is probably best deleted for now (IMDb takes care of the necessary information anyway). The best my searches found was this at News. SwisterTwister talk 06:40, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment -- As a BLP, it ought to have sources. It does not seem to be too bad an article in principle (if sourced). Not sure whether she is really notable. I cannot see the point in redirecting to one of her roles, and I am reluctant to vote delete, but fear that may be the only viable option, though it would be a pity. Peterkingiron (talk) 16:59, 5 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • To be honest I'd prefer it to be kept and improved but unfortunately if there's no sources it probably means no improvements either, It hasn't been improved in the last 8 years it's been here and being completely honest I don't think it'll ever be improved, –Davey2010Talk 17:05, 5 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It is easy to verify the credits in the article simply by looking up the programmes, but it is incredibly hard to source youtube videos. i.e. rocket boy and toro: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1YD-4gh-z54&t=10m42s ~ - annonymous user — Preceding unsigned comment added by 176.62.213.9 (talk) 19:57, 6 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Probably any of us working on AfD have too much time on our hands, eh?--Rpclod (talk) 12:19, 8 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.