The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.‎

The result was no consensus. CitiCat ^♫ 01:28, 26 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Holy Cross Catholic Secondary School (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Stub on a school with no sources, no importance asserted, and nearly no information even in the infobox. >Radiant< 13:10, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - significant high school with notable sporting achievements and other awards. The article needs to be expanded and improved not deleted. TerriersFan 16:03, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletions. —-- DS1953 ^talk 17:38, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. This article has been vastly improved by TerriersFan since its nomination and now is well-sourced. The school is clearly notable. -- DS1953 ^talk 17:41, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete a well-sourced article chock-a-block with verifiability that makes no credible assertion of any notability whatsoever. Eusebeus 18:48, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment - notability comes through WP:N by way of multiple sources which this article obviously has. TerriersFan 22:54, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• No. Eusebeus 14:05, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Terriers, the sources verify that exactly zero really notable events or characteristics can be attributed to the school. All the sources provided fail WP:N as patently trivial. They are the very definition in fact: "pieces or bits of information of little important or value." VanTucky ^(talk) 15:34, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete sources verify that the school is not notable in any way. VanTucky ^(talk) 20:06, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, excellent job by User:TerriersFan in improving this article -- Samir 22:55, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per above.--JForget 00:47, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Trivial information/directory info/students winning awards etc do not grant notability to a school Corpx 01:58, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep ample reliable and verifiable sources satisfy the Wikipedia:Notability standard. Alansohn 06:14, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge Somewhere. As convincing as the fact that the school won the "Best School Float" award in 2006 at the Greater Kingston Santa Parade is, I remain unconvinced of its real notability. Someone appears to have dug deep and found some fluff pieces about the school, so I figure it should go somewhere. --ForbiddenWord 12:45, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Good start, and of course notable. Brandon97 14:17, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - The article is only a stub (and I have just tagged it so), but so are many articles. I thought it was agreed that Secondary Schools were generally notable per se, but primary schools needed to prove particular notability. Being a stub is not a reason for deletion. Peterkingiron 22:42, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep since there are ample non-trivial reliable sources to meet notability. Burntsauce 17:29, 23 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Every school wins SOME kind of awards. Not notable to me. MarkinBoston 00:27, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.