User talk:RossyAmbarsari

Removing sourced material

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. OhNoitsJamie Talk 14:04, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, RossyAmbarsari. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicizing, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. OhNoitsJamie Talk 14:15, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

February 2025

Information icon Chita Awards should not be added to the lists of awards noted at the end of musical theatre articles. I do not think this is appropriate, as the lists of musical theatre awards are already too long, containing such relatively minor awards as Critics' Circle. The choreographers' own articles can, of course, mention their Chita awards. Wikipedia articles about musicals shouldn't just be long tables of awards and casts. The should discuss and contextualize the most important things about the musicals. -- Ssilvers (talk) 17:25, 12 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The award should be included, especially for dance heavy shows. The awards get coverage in Playbill, Broadwayworld.com etc. Following recent discussion on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Musical Theatre RossyAmbarsari (talk) 23:06, 12 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Siti Hartinah, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dutch. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 19:58, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions; however, please remember the essential rule of respecting copyrights. Edits to Wikipedia, such as your edit to the page De-Sukarnoization, may not contain material from copyrighted sources unless that text is available under a suitable free license. It is almost never okay to copy extensive text out of a book or website and paste it into a Wikipedia article with little or no alteration, though you can clearly and briefly quote copyrighted text in the right circumstances. Content that does not comply with this legal rule must be removed. For more information on this, see:

If you still have questions, there is the Teahouse, or you can click here to ask a question on your talk page and someone will be along to answer it shortly. As you get started, you may find the pages below to be helpful.

I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! Diannaa (talk) 21:47, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

May 2025

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
Moneytrees🏝️(Talk) 23:54, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request

cross icon
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

RossyAmbarsari (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))


Request reason:

I have no relation whatsoever to user (Ruthie Ann Miles). I have edited articles to pursue neutrality and I will continue to vouch for neutrality on Wikipedia.

Decline reason:

I don't believe you. Yamla (talk) 21:35, 11 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

That seems highly unlikely; even putting aside the technical evidence, you have similar editing styles and a shared interest in Suharto. Given the POV editing and discussion stacking you engaged in on that article, your claim of “pursuing neutral editing” if unblocked seems weak. Moneytrees🏝️(Talk) 19:13, 10 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]