I came across some debates about notability criteria for tech entrepreneurs. Does anyone have insights into how Wikipedia defines "significant coverage" in independent sources? Ikigai15 (talk) 17:23, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Sunil Kaushik and Yuka Yokozawa. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it is promotional and reads like an advertisement and you may have a possible Conflict of Interest. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 01:54, 10 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Lijil was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

It's possible that the BOOK is notable (if there are multiple reviews of it in independent, reliable sources then it is notable) but I don't see evidence that the authors of it are notable yet. I suggest you try writing an article about the book instead.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sunil Kaushik and Yuka Yokozawa and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Lijil (talk) 16:48, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

== Request for Reconsideration: Significant Independent Coverage ==

Thank you for your previous review and helpful feedback. I would like to clarify that there is significant, independent coverage of the subjects in major national publications, focused specifically on the journey of Sunil Kaushik and Yuka Yokozawa (Sushi and Sambar). The following are examples of detailed, feature articles written by independent journalists, not just passing mentions:

• ["In 380 days, couple cuts through 17 countries, 38 borders on bicycles" – Times of India, Feb 6, 2017](https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/bengaluru/in-380-days-couple-cuts-through-17-countries-38-borders-on-bicycles/articleshow/56996311.cms): A feature story by Sreemoyee Chatterjee detailing the couple’s journey, backgrounds, experiences, and motivations.
• ["Sushi and Sambar: Wheeling their way around the world" – The Hindu, Aug 28, 2018](https://www.thehindu.com/life-and-style/travel/sushi-and-sambar-on-their-cycling-trip-around-the-world/article24813280.ece): In-depth profile by Divya Kala Bhavani focusing on their meeting, marriage, and international journey, with interviews and analysis.
• [News Minute – "This Bengaluru Couple Travelled Across 38 Borders at Rs 350 a Day"](https://www.thenewsminute.com/article/bengaluru-couple-travelled-across-38-borders-rs-350-day-57254): Feature article centered on the couple’s journey and experiences.
• [The Better India – "On 2 Cycles and a Tight Budget, This Indo-Japanese Couple Has Been to 17 Countries in a Year"](https://www.thebetterindia.com/87261/sushi-sambar-couple-cycling-trip-thailand-portugal/): Article focused on the details of their adventure and life choices.
• [Bangalore Mirror – multiple feature stories documenting their journey and experiences. Example: "The adventures of Sushi and Sambar part 17: No Spain, no gain"](https://bangaloremirror.indiatimes.com/bangalore/others/the-adventures-of-sushi-and-sambar-part-17-no-spain-no-gain/articleshow/57241855.cms)
• [The Quint – "This Bengaluru Couple Travelled Across 38 Borders at Rs 350 a Day"](https://www.thequint.com/news/india/bengaluru-couple-travelled-across-38-borders-at-rs-350-a-day): Feature article by Geetika Mantri, focusing on the couple’s background, journey, and experiences.

In addition to these national sources, there are also multiple regional and non-English language articles providing further coverage.

Each of these examples is a substantial profile, not a brief mention. The focus of the coverage is on Sunil Kaushik and Yuka Yokozawa and their journey. If needed, I can provide English summaries or additional details from regional media as well.

I kindly request a second opinion on the notability of the subjects, considering the significant coverage outlined above.

Thank you for your time and review. Ikigai15 (talk) 17:47, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ikigai15! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Lijil (talk) 16:48, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ikigai15. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Sunil Kaushik and Yuka Yokozawa".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply , and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 11:26, 15 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]