Hullo! Thanks for your comments on the new Cat Hobaiter page. Is there any better way to find categories than guessing or looking at how similar people/things are categorised? Is there a list/tree anywhere? I have discovered Hot Cat, which is interesting but does not give suggestions. An obvious good one for Cat Hobaiter (primatologist) does not seem to exist. Is there any point in creating new categories? --MerielGJones (talk) 13:58, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! To be honest I'm personally mostly only familar with categories under the banner of Category:Women scientists.

There is a hierachy though, but I'm not sure where you'd find that as an easy to follow diagram. Wikipedia:Contents/Categories is probably the closest though, with Wikipedia:Contents/Natural_and_physical_sciences being the next level down, then Category:Scientists and so on.

Special:Categories is the master list, but harder to navigate.

Hot Cat is definitely helpful, especially for autocompleting categories when you only know part of the name, but it's not clever enough to suggest ones based on the article. Creating new categories is certainly an option, if you believe a new category would have multiple entries. For 'Primatologists', I'm not sure where it would fit best, somewhere under Category:Scientists by field, perhaps under 'Naturalists' and/or 'Biologists by field of research'? That's where things like 'Zoologists‎' fit at least. Or could even go slightly deeper to Category:Zoologists by field of research? Categories often fit into multiple places simultanously, which is also fine (i.e. categories themselves are also in categories). -Kj cheetham (talk) 14:18, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

MerielGJones, When I actually looked more closely, I found both Category:Primatologists and Category:Women primatologists already do exist!. -Kj cheetham (talk) 08:33, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kj cheetham I am sure I tried primatologist ... maybe mis-spelt or something. Many thanks for finding them!--MerielGJones (talk) 10:03, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Kj cheetham,

thanks for your comments on the new page, I did not know about the opportunity to send a page draft for editing to you first (this would have been good..). Just tried to translate a long existing german Wikipedia page since there were recently requenst from english speakers. About the "copyright" issue: there is a limited number of combinations of wordings for a CV, so if you indicate which passages you see as a problem, I can change those. Btw it is my own text/copyright from all sources.. I'm just not sure about the correct mechanism required to prove that or solve this issue. Thanks for all your help! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Odysseus3 (talk • contribs) 16:30, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, thanks for your message! To be honest I personally only took a relatively quick read over it as part of New Page Patrol, there is also the formal Articles for creation process available if that's of use to you for future articles you create, which you might have come across before.

For the Stefan Dübel article, it probably needs a bit of editing still for grammar, etc. I tagged it with the 'External Links' tag as it's better to have webpage links as references, rather than as external links embedded in the body of the article, or at least in the 'External links' section near the bottom of the article. It needs some references in the Biography section too, as it's a biography of a living person.

I'm not really familar enough regarding how to incorporate your own copyrighted materials, but is something you could ask about at Wikipedia:Teahouse if need be. It's better (and easier) to write things with different words for Wikipedia though where possible. The Earwig's Copyvio Detector tool highlights the parts it detected as being a potential violation.

As a final tip, you can sign your comments on Talk pages with -~~~~ to automatically add your name to messages, to save a bot having to do it. :)

-Kj cheetham (talk) 17:35, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Kj cheetham. Your account has been added to the "New page reviewers" user group. Please check back at WP:PERM in case your user right is time limited or probationary. This user group allows you to review new pages through the Curation system and mark them as patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or nominate them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is vital to maintaining the integrity of the encyclopedia. If you have not already done so, you must read the tutorial at New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the deletion policy. If you need any help or want to discuss the process, you are welcome to use the new page reviewer talk page. In addition, please remember:

• Be nice to new editors. They are usually not aware that they are doing anything wrong. Do make use of the message feature when tagging pages for maintenance so that they are aware.
• You will frequently be asked by users to explain why their page is being deleted. Please be formal and polite in your approach to them – even if they are not.
• If you are not sure what to do with a page, don't review it – just leave it for another reviewer.
• Accuracy is more important than speed. Take your time to patrol each page. Use the message feature to communicate with article creators and offer advice as much as possible.

The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you also may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In cases of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, or long-term inactivity, the right may be withdrawn at administrator discretion. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 22:47, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

What are you trying to do at Talk:Philippine languages (language group)? As you can see in the page history, the page was recently moved boldly from Philippine languages. Now that the move has been contested by Austronesier, the only sensible thing to do is to move it back. Nardog (talk) 15:57, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nardog Sorry, I think I messed it up a bit! The request went to 'Uncontroversial technical requests', then I moved it to 'Requests to revert undiscussed moves', then I believe someone else removed that request which I interpretted as a contest, hence opening a discussion, and oddly the tag already on the talk page had a nowiki tag around it, which I tried to remove. Also some confusion as the page seemed to have change name multiple times recently. I agree the whole thing should be reverted, so will leave to someone else to implement. -Kj cheetham (talk) 16:05, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You've got it backwards. Someone boldly moved it a couple times, then Austronesier opened an RM to move it back, then the same person moved it again mid-discussion, and then I filed the technical move request and disabled the RM template because the move was done without discussion in the first place so no RM is necessary. It looks like ZI Jony removed it from RM/TR because he misinterpreted the order of events like you did, possibly misled by your reply there. Nardog (talk) 16:24, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

That makes more sense. I still plan to leave it alone now in any case. -Kj cheetham (talk) 16:29, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your prompt response and kindness , so far you're the only admin who actually addressed me as if I am a human and not a "stupid rookie". Stay safe and take care :) Glow--stick7 (talk) 13:18, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

That's very kind of you, much appreciated! I should add though I'm not an admin, just someone who has spent too many hours on Wikipedia. :) -Kj cheetham (talk) 14:14, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a Move review of Crotalus concolor. Because you closed the move discussion for this page, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the move review. —BarrelProof (talk) 21:38, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dear User:Kj cheetham, together with User:S.lopiano we have done the analysis you suggested to detect copyright infringements in the page Sensitivity analysis. The results are surprising, please give a look. Thanks for your help.

Andrea Saltelli 15:45, 24 August 2020 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Saltean (talk • contribs)

Many thanks for your comment, and I'll try take a look tomorrow. -Kj cheetham (talk) 18:53, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Kj cheetham! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, How best to check if a newly created article is 'substantially identical' to a deleted one?, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to . The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:03, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I'm working on the copy-paste backlog and I notice that I've deleted a couple of copypaste tags that you recently posted -- in particular on Robert Kyagulanyi Ssentamu and on Change management. In both cases, the copypaste source seems to be spam pages or copy-pastes of Wikipedia posted after the original content was added here. Just wanted to let you know in case you wanted to review those changes. Cheers! Themillofkeytone (talk) 00:04, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Themillofkeytone Thank you for following those up! Only one of those two was my actually tag, but I'm sure you'll come across more of mine before too long. :) You may also want to take a look at WP:BACKWARDSCOPY and the related template {{backwardscopy}}, which I only came across myself very recently. -Kj cheetham (talk) 08:30, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

		The Friendship Barnstar
		For your help in reviewing my newly created BLPs CanadaMaple123 (talk) 06:06, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

CanadaMaple123 Thank you, glad to be of help! -Kj cheetham (talk) 09:22, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

In article name Tarkhan I would like to removed racial comments about caste influence in society.tarkhan is second to jat etc — Preceding unsigned comment added by Manvir Malik (talk • contribs) 10:02, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Manvir Malik Please include a comment in the Edit summary when making such changes. -Kj cheetham (talk) 10:05, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ok my lovely friend — Preceding unsigned comment added by Manvir Malik (talk • contribs) 10:08, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Check this sockfarm and SPI casepage Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Punjabier. I've already added those two accounts. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 10:42, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]