User talk:AleatoryPonderings: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
welcome to WiR
Line 56: Line 56:
People are not required to do a quid pro quo review for the first five submissions they make at DYK. You can see how many reviews someone has made by clicking "QPQ check" in the toolbox on the left side of the nomination. That will take you to [https://betacommand-dev.toolforge.org/cgi-bin/dyk.py this page]. Just put in the nominator's username, and it will show you how many DYK credits they have. If they have 5 or more, they need a QPQ. [[User:The Squirrel Conspiracy|The Squirrel Conspiracy]] ([[User talk:The Squirrel Conspiracy|talk]]) 21:43, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
People are not required to do a quid pro quo review for the first five submissions they make at DYK. You can see how many reviews someone has made by clicking "QPQ check" in the toolbox on the left side of the nomination. That will take you to [https://betacommand-dev.toolforge.org/cgi-bin/dyk.py this page]. Just put in the nominator's username, and it will show you how many DYK credits they have. If they have 5 or more, they need a QPQ. [[User:The Squirrel Conspiracy|The Squirrel Conspiracy]] ([[User talk:The Squirrel Conspiracy|talk]]) 21:43, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
:{{ping|The Squirrel Conspiracy}} Thank you! Will be sure to use that in future :) [[User:AleatoryPonderings|AleatoryPonderings]] ([[User talk:AleatoryPonderings#top|talk]]) 22:04, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
:{{ping|The Squirrel Conspiracy}} Thank you! Will be sure to use that in future :) [[User:AleatoryPonderings|AleatoryPonderings]] ([[User talk:AleatoryPonderings#top|talk]]) 22:04, 24 June 2020 (UTC)

==Women in Red==
Hi there, AleatoryPonderings, and welcome to Women in Red. Although you've only been contributing for a couple of weeks, I see you have already created a variety of articles including four interesting biographies of women. As you are interested in law, you might find some women deserving coverage in our [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/Missing articles by occupation/Law|Wikidata list of redlinks on law]] or in the other topics covered by our [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/Redlist index|redlists]]. If you haven't already done so, you might find it useful to look through our [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/Essays/Ten Simple Rules for Women in Red|Ten Simple Rules]]. Please let me know if you run into any difficulties or need assistance. Happy editing!--[[User:Ipigott|Ipigott]] ([[User talk:Ipigott|talk]]) 10:31, 27 June 2020 (UTC)

Revision as of 10:31, 27 June 2020

AleatoryPonderings, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Teahouse logo

Hi AleatoryPonderings! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like 78.26 (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:02, 14 June 2020 (UTC)


Please verify

I made the following change [1], please verify those are correct. Coumans in particular should be fine, the original version was published in 2010, and was online afterwards (2011), but I don't know if the Janda changes are correct or if you had another source in mind. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 00:41, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yup, both right – thank you very much! Those were definitely oversights on my part. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 00:48, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A belated welcome!

The welcome may be belated, but the cookies are still warm!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, AleatoryPonderings! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

If you don't already know, you should sign your posts on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) to insert your username and the date.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! CommanderWaterford (talk) 07:06, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much @CommanderWaterford! I really appreciate it :) AleatoryPonderings (talk) 13:38, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

QPQ check at DYK

Hi! Thanks for reviewing a submission at Did you know!

In the review, you mentioned that you don't know how to check whether someone is exempt from the QPQ requirement.

People are not required to do a quid pro quo review for the first five submissions they make at DYK. You can see how many reviews someone has made by clicking "QPQ check" in the toolbox on the left side of the nomination. That will take you to this page. Just put in the nominator's username, and it will show you how many DYK credits they have. If they have 5 or more, they need a QPQ. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 21:43, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@The Squirrel Conspiracy: Thank you! Will be sure to use that in future :) AleatoryPonderings (talk) 22:04, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red

Hi there, AleatoryPonderings, and welcome to Women in Red. Although you've only been contributing for a couple of weeks, I see you have already created a variety of articles including four interesting biographies of women. As you are interested in law, you might find some women deserving coverage in our Wikidata list of redlinks on law or in the other topics covered by our redlists. If you haven't already done so, you might find it useful to look through our Ten Simple Rules. Please let me know if you run into any difficulties or need assistance. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 10:31, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]