This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Northern Ireland High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Northern Ireland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Northern Ireland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Northern IrelandWikipedia:WikiProject Northern IrelandTemplate:WikiProject Northern IrelandNorthern Ireland-related High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Disaster management High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disaster management, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Disaster management on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Disaster managementWikipedia:WikiProject Disaster managementTemplate:WikiProject Disaster managementDisaster management High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Irish republicanism High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Irish republicanism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Irish republicanism and Irish nationalism related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Irish republicanismWikipedia:WikiProject Irish republicanismTemplate:WikiProject Irish republicanismIrish republicanism High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Ireland High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ireland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ireland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IrelandWikipedia:WikiProject IrelandTemplate:WikiProject IrelandIreland High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Military history: British / European Start‑class This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history Start This article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale. Associated task forces: /  British military history task force European military history task force

Surprise surprise, my criticism of the political and historical bias in this article has been removed and I was "logged out" of Wikipedia. Clearly this article is being controlled by a biased moderator with a political skew or agenda.

If you cannot even debate in Talk an article, and discuss its overall historically accuracy and key facts, then Wikipedia cannot be taken seriously as an historical or academic reference source (as indeed it's not by most leading academic universities, certainly not by mine anyway, we're discouraged from referencing to it). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.241.26.204 (talk) 13:45, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Talk pages are for discussing improvements to articles and for nothing else. You presented a number of critisisms and 'facts' but you failed to provide a reliable source for any of it. The current article, on the other hand, is well referenced, though it can always be improved. 86.149.141.166 (talk) 14:27, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

What the IP address beginning with 86 said, IP address beginning with 89. Furthermore, nobody logged you out, you weren't logged in when you made your contribution of unverified "facts" and opinion, and still weren't logged in when you commented above. If there are any inaccuracies in the article, feel free to challenge or improve the sources. I do recommend creating an account and reading the five pillars, though. Bastun^{Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!} 14:45, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This section title sounds weird to me. How about "Deaths" or "Casualties"?

Otherwise it sounds like the Walking Dead... 100.12.87.210 (talk) 13:17, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nuro Dragonfly Do you wish to comment here? 100.12.87.210 (talk) 13:50, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Support change to "Casualties" for consistency across the wiki. Scr★pIron^IV 15:06, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Support - To be honest I feel it is..well not weird so much, but has a tone that's morbid. We are trying to have that Neutral stance, and considering the topic....

Nürö ^{G'DÄŸ MÄTË} 00:13, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Support change to casualties. Mabuska ^(talk) 19:08, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Would anyone object to this being renamed? Traditionally, the word "divide" in relation to Northern Ireland would refer to the division between Catholics and Protestants. While it is true Bloody Sunday would have had some impact on that relationship it was primarily the relationship between the Catholic population and the British Army, and to a lesser extent the British establishment as a whole. Perhaps a change to "Impact on the Troubles" or "Impact on Northern Ireland" would be more appropriate?DanceHallCrasher (talk) 18:34, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for the late interjection but I oppose your recent edit. Its affect continues to the present day so isn't confined to the Troubles so that is a poor title. Its impact is more in regards to the divide not the country as a whole as not everyone is seperated by the divide. Mabuska ^(talk) 19:12, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

"Northern Ireland divisions" is an equally, if not more, poor title.DanceHallCrasher (talk) 19:34, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

As stated I disagree. Mabuska ^(talk) 11:20, 24 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Jackson was not second-in-command of 1 Para, as the article claims. He was the adjutant, which is not the same thing. And the sentence which comes after that false claim is not supported by the source cited. Khamba Tendal (talk) 18:47, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wouldn't surprise me. Feel free to amend the entries to better match what is actually said. Quite a lot of subtle and overt POV in these kinds of articles. Mabuska ^(talk) 20:01, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Bloody Sunday (1972). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140102231700/http://www.rwuk.org/new/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/BloodySundayWeek8.pdf to http://www.rwuk.org/new/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/BloodySundayWeek8.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140102231700/http://www.rwuk.org/new/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/BloodySundayWeek8.pdf to http://www.rwuk.org/new/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/BloodySundayWeek8.pdf
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.visioncritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/2010.06.28_Sunday_BRI.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110927000550/http://www.christymoore.com/lyrics_detail.php?id=91 to http://www.christymoore.com/lyrics_detail.php?id=91

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:43, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]