Freemasonry High‑importance

This article is part of WikiProject Freemasonry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Freemasonry articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to join us in our labors, please join the discussion and add your name to the list of participants. The "Top of the Trestleboard" section below can offer some ideas on where to start and what to do.FreemasonryWikipedia:WikiProject FreemasonryTemplate:WikiProject FreemasonryFreemasonry High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. ◆  WikiProject Freemasonry's "Top of the Trestleboard": Improve to Featured Article status Freemasonry Tracing board Isaac Newton University Lodge Societas Rosicruciana in Anglia Operative Masonry Primitive Scottish Rite Add content to stubs… Check recently changed articles for possible improvement, to remove vandalism, etc. Requests Articles for all United Grand Lodge of England-recognized Grand Lodges (if notable) Participate in articles listed for deletion Need images Scottish Rite York Rite Sovereign Grand Lodge of Malta New Article to be created Adonhiramite Rite Portuguese Rite Brazilian Rite Irish Rite Moorish Rite Rite Français Moderne Rétabli Articles to be re-written Freemasonry in Cuba - Entirely AI generated.

Lists List‑class Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList List This article has been rated as List-class on the project's quality scale. Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

I have to question this recent addition... It is (apparently) a newly founded (2016) Grand Lodge located in Romania... but I can not find any reliable sources to support this claim. It does have a webpage (http://www.mlreu.org/index.php/en/) but I find no indication that it has an existence beyond its webpage. The problem is that anyone can create a webpage... having a webpage does not mean there is any substance behind it. I think we need a bit more. Blueboar (talk) 16:17, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I fully agree. We probably should post a standard rule of inclusion here on this web page, for those seeking to add a new group. Jax MN (talk) 16:32, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Just bookmarking the absence of the GL website at present. Their Facebook page still points to the dead site, so may be a temporary aberration. If it doesn't re-appear, status needs re-assessment. Fiddlersmouth (talk) 01:38, 25 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]