I am personally endorsing and promoting this proposal, because I think that revert warring has become an absurd drain on us, and it has not worked for it to be a mere guideline of politeness, nor has it proved effective for the ArbCom to consider every single case of this. Violation of the 3RR is widely considered to be a problem in the community, even by those who are the worst violators. Jimbo Wales 03:05, 14 Nov 2004 (UTC)

The purpose of this proposal is that the arbitration committee members (as a whole) want to reduce the load of 3RR violation cases they see.

If you violate the three-revert rule, sysops may block you for up to 24 hours.

In the cases where both parties violate the rule, sysops should treat both sides equally.

This poll will last for 2 weeks, ending at 03:00 on November 28, 2004.

1. Jimbo Wales 03:05, 14 Nov 2004 (UTC)
2. →Raul654 03:07, Nov 14, 2004 (UTC)
3. Martin 03:08, 14 Nov 2004 (UTC)
4. Grunt 🇪🇺 03:09, 2004 Nov 14 (UTC)
5. [[User:Neutrality|Neutrality (hopefully!)]] 03:09, Nov 14, 2004 (UTC)
6. Of course. --Conti|✉ 03:13, Nov 14, 2004 (UTC)