Portal talk:Human sexuality: Difference between revisions
John of Reading (talk | contribs) Undid revision 552142375 by 1.187.160.237 (talk) off-topic |
Mercurywoodrose (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
==dudesnude== |
==dudesnude== |
||
I need help finding resources, copyediting, expanding, improving, finding sources and saving [[dudesnude]]. |
I need help finding resources, copyediting, expanding, improving, finding sources and saving re: [[dudesnude]].13:33, 24 November 2010 [[User:Hemanetwork |
||
Revision as of 05:16, 3 July 2014
| Sexology and sexuality | ||||
| ||||
hands
I was wondering about the choice of the intelinked male and female symbols and man and woman hlding hands. These seem to illustrate a very specific type of heterosexual sexuality. Wouldn't the sexuality portal be better served by images (or a lack thereof) which included the full scope of human sexuality? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.81.146.208 (talk) 12:39, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
Bisexuality bias
Currently the front page is completely dedicated to same sex relationships, and bisexuality. Seeing as how these are not the majority of human sexuality, I believe this is quite imbalanced. Currently: picture at top is of same sex relationship, and links to it while paragraph speaks about ethics of same and bi sexuality. Selected article is bisexuality, and 'random' image is LGBT flag. Maybe whoever edited this overdid it when they tried to make it more balanced? Just maybe. 193.105.7.54 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 19:22, 11 April 2012 (UTC).
- Actually the Portal:Sexuality page shows a random choice from a wide selection of articles and pictures. I clicked the "Show new selected content" link and now it displays an article and picture that are not related to bisexuality. Follow the All selected articles and All random pictures links to see the full range. -- John of Reading (talk) 19:45, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
dudesnude
I need help finding resources, copyediting, expanding, improving, finding sources and saving re: dudesnude.13:33, 24 November 2010 [[User:Hemanetwork