Talk:Suicide of Rehtaeh Parsons: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Geniac (talk | contribs)
banners
Line 16: Line 16:
::::::I'm grateful. I think expanding my message here would be counter-productive, but I am happy to continue on your or my talk pages if you wish. [[User:Timtrent|Fiddle Faddle]] ([[User talk:Timtrent|talk]]) 16:23, 11 April 2013 (UTC)
::::::I'm grateful. I think expanding my message here would be counter-productive, but I am happy to continue on your or my talk pages if you wish. [[User:Timtrent|Fiddle Faddle]] ([[User talk:Timtrent|talk]]) 16:23, 11 April 2013 (UTC)
:::::::Whatever you say. [[User:Yogesh Khandke|Yogesh Khandke]] ([[User talk:Yogesh Khandke|talk]]) 16:30, 11 April 2013 (UTC)
:::::::Whatever you say. [[User:Yogesh Khandke|Yogesh Khandke]] ([[User talk:Yogesh Khandke|talk]]) 16:30, 11 April 2013 (UTC)

==further sources==
*[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7_D_zvizzKA&feature=youtu.be anonymous 1st statement]
*[http://pastebin.com/Q8VWUy7a anonymous 2nd statement]
--[[User:Túrelio|Túrelio]] ([[User talk:Túrelio|talk]]) 07:21, 12 April 2013 (UTC)

Revision as of 07:21, 12 April 2013

Comparison with Delhi rape incident

In comparison with the 2012 Delhi gang rape case hasn't this case seen US politicians fishing in troubled waters? Yogesh Khandke (talk) 14:20, 11 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Canadian politicians, not U.S. politicians. This happened in Canada. Ss6j81avz (talk) 15:58, 11 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
YK, please confine use of the talk page to discussing improvements to the article. Fiddle Faddle (talk) 16:01, 11 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the reminder Fiddle Faddle, and Ss6j81avz, I know what I was talking about, US politicians fishing in Canadian troubled waters just as they did in Indian troubled waters.[1][2] It is a small world, I just wanted someone more more informed to contribute all aspects of the incident. (Fiddle Faddle that is discussing improvements to the article.) Yogesh Khandke (talk) 16:10, 11 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I am not sure that it is. If it proves to be as you state then I think there are more important items to work upon and to discuss first. It feels to me as if a political point is being made out of the unfortunate young lady;s experiences and death. In the wider world it may be the case, but WIkipedia's article talk pages are not the place, as we all know. At least adjourn this discussion until other and far more useful aspects of the article are complete. Fiddle Faddle (talk) 16:14, 11 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I don't understand a lot of what you've written except the adjourn part which I'm happy to do. Yogesh Khandke (talk) 16:19, 11 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I'm grateful. I think expanding my message here would be counter-productive, but I am happy to continue on your or my talk pages if you wish. Fiddle Faddle (talk) 16:23, 11 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Whatever you say. Yogesh Khandke (talk) 16:30, 11 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

further sources

--Túrelio (talk) 07:21, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]