Template:UserTalkArchiveBox

I've gone ahead and created Bosnia and Herzegovina related user boxes and I thought you might be interested. [1] PRODUCER (talk) 03:29, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I have nominated temlate:Untrue for deletion. You may review and participate in the discussion here. Thanks, Wikidemon (talk) 08:44, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Could you say which templates (apart from Template:Hoax and Template:Disputed) were used in the creation of Template:Untrue? I'd like to check them for tone. AlmostReadytoFly (talk) 15:51, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Santasa99, thanks for the reply. I think when you combined the bits of text from each template, the language that resulted was far stronger than the originals, and "attempts to mislead..." comes off as particularly harsh and uncivil. As you pointed out in the discussion, it could be toned down, but there's still the problem that the template tries to cover the jobs of several others, and doesn't do it as well. As for the argument that Untrue take up less space, I would argue that if an article is bad enough to have multiple issues, it might be a good thing if the warning template is big and ugly.

I think you're right that it can be hard to find the correct template though. I just don't think this can be it. AlmostReadytoFly (talk) 20:23, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Done making User page, now you can place boxes you made, etc. Please, don't make it too flashy !--ZmajeviOdBosne (talk) 19:49, 15 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:Pocitelj sa citadele.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.iartcp.org/spip/IMG/jpg/DSC01507.jpg. As a copyright violation, File:Pocitelj sa citadele.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:Pocitelj sa citadele.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

• If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at File talk:Pocitelj sa citadele.jpg and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) and CC-BY-SA, under CC-BY-SA, or released into the public domain leave a note at File talk:Pocitelj sa citadele.jpg with a link to where we can find that note.
• If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on File talk:Pocitelj sa citadele.jpg.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Martin H. (talk) 00:09, 23 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:Glavaticevo u Zupi na Neretvi.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). As a copyright violation, File:Glavaticevo u Zupi na Neretvi.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:Glavaticevo u Zupi na Neretvi.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

• If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at File talk:Glavaticevo u Zupi na Neretvi.jpg and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) and CC-BY-SA, under CC-BY-SA, or released into the public domain leave a note at File talk:Glavaticevo u Zupi na Neretvi.jpg with a link to where we can find that note.
• If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on File talk:Glavaticevo u Zupi na Neretvi.jpg.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Nja²⁴⁷ 08:26, 23 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to upload inappropriate images, such as File:Glavatica Neretvanska.jpg, & File:Zubatak iz Hutovog.jpg to Wikipedia, you will be blocked. Please do not continue to upload images that are against copyright and image upload policies Nja²⁴⁷ 17:10, 23 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:Mekousna.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). As a copyright violation, File:Mekousna.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:Mekousna.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

• If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at File talk:Mekousna.jpg and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) and CC-BY-SA, under CC-BY-SA, or released into the public domain leave a note at File talk:Mekousna.jpg with a link to where we can find that note.
• If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on File talk:Mekousna.jpg.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. feydey (talk) 17:41, 23 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Do You need help editing Wikipedia? For more please see what Wikipedia is about. Best, feydey (talk) 21:03, 23 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have restored the image (File:Mekousna.jpg), please take action so the image can be used in Wikipedia pages in the future. It is now used at http://www.ribe-hrvatske.com/images/S.%20obtusirostris/untitled.htm . Unless a link to a webpage with an explicit permission is provided, or an email from the copyright owner is sent or forwarded to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, the image will be deleted. feydey (talk) 00:49, 24 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Regarding your post on my talk page. I am off to work and I don't really have time to sort through or consider the lengthy post in detail. If you seek help consider one of our noticeboards, as I'd be sad to see you go if you're actually dedicated and are trying. If you have a specific question feel free to ask. Nja²⁴⁷ 05:34, 24 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Gabela Bosnia and Herzegovina.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. -- Bojan  04:07, 28 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I see you moved "Una (Sava)" to "Una River (Bosnia and Herzegovina)". See Talk:Una (Sava) for my reasons, we can discuss there if you disagree. Markussep ^Talk 14:33, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

U čemu je točno problem s tim člankom? Ne kužim o čemu točno želiš znati moje mišljenje.. --Ivan Štambuk (talk) 01:38, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Napisao sam vam tamo na diskusiji o članku - ne mogu da stignem da odgovorim jer radim istovremeno na četiri jezika (i ne mislim na jezike južnih slovena) u isto vrijeme, oprosti ali jebi ga.

Problem je da ovaj mali privjesak slavi svako blokiranje (bez obzira da li vandal ili ne) ljudi koji se očigledno bore da sastave svoj skrhani identitet - a onda pravi trolovi koji ni slučajno ne daju reči da spadaju u kliku nacionalista seeru po tome. Sve se kriju noge, znaš, kao neutralo ću ti ja reči ono što treba da znaš o Vuku Karađiću, Bosnaskom, Bošnjaštvu itd. Imao sam fakat samo pristojnu namjeru da do pristojne mjere isprovociram on što se krije iza "dobronamjernih" i " neutralnih" editora na ovim Bošnjačkim člancima .

Moram li još jednom reči da sam Hrvat ?

Nit sam imao namjeru da se mješam u pisanje na članku, niti mi je namjera da "tučem" s ludacima. Ako se stvarno trudite da utičete na ishod pisanja tog članka, otkud to da ne mogu da vidim kako se uz čitavu tabelu jezika koje govorite ne nalazi Bosanski - zar to nije čudno. Mislim, ti i ne želiš da pokažeš da priznaješ da uopštee postoji, "znate ja govorim Bosanski jako dobro i evo Babel (tako se valjda zove ovaj box) kao dokaz" !? Mislim da li ti se gadi da staviš box BS i tako pokažeš da ga govoriš - ja mislim da dobronamjeran homo sapiens bilo gdje na planeti bi se udostojijo bar toliko. E onda možeš s autoritetom reči ja sam pošteni editor ovog članka, je tako ?

Mislim ti se sad možeš naljutiti, prijaviti me ali ljudskost iz mpje namjere ne možeš istjerati. Jebiga, lave.

stvarno sam imao najpošteniju namjeru.

Ne znam jesi li primjetio ali DIR i ja samo između ostaloga odagnali popriličan broj nacionalističkih pacijenata sa ovog projekta, specifično na članku o bosanskom korisnika User:Aradic-es koji ima toliki fetiš na pljuvanje po Bošnjacima da su mu čak i na hrv. wiki (koju 0wnaju raznorazni ustašoidi) rekli da smanji doživljaje. Mi smo "good guys" ako nisi primjetio ^_^

Što se tiče babel kutijice - ovo "hrvatski" gledam na isti način na koji Amerikanci stavljaju "American English", Brazilci "Brazillian Portuguese" itd. - regionalna oznaka, ništa više. Stvarno mi je nepojmljivo da te to toliko uzrujava o_O --Ivan Štambuk (talk) 02:22, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A što se tiče jezika - pa ja vodim bitku na jedno 10 wiki-fronti za objedinjavanje ovih "različitih jezika" pod kišobranom srpskohrvatskog. Čak mi je i ime došlo u novine zbog toga (nešto tipa "nacionalni izdajnik" :P). Moje mišljenje o tome postoji li bosanski/bošnjački jezik - da, ali isključivo u standardološkom smislu kao jedan od nacionalnih varijeteta policentričnog standardnog jezika srpskohrvatskog. Uvjeravam te da mi nije ni najmanja namjera obezvrjeđivati Bošnjake ili bošnjaštvo. Ako vidiš nešto problematično u članku ili mojim uređivanjima slobodno mi javi. --Ivan Štambuk (talk) 02:28, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Jesam, sječam se tvojih postova i tvojih stavova od ranije na drugim člancima o Bosni - stvarno se sječam i mislio sam da su više nego uredu. Sječam se tvojih odbijanja čovjeka koji se predstavlja kao AntoAnto i dr.

Ali daj pokušaj sad ovo da shvatiš - nije neki poseban domet reči ja nisam ustašoidni fašist - zar ne ? Zamisli slijedeču situaciju - naiđeš na Bošnjaka bjesnog i ozlojađenog i umjesto da mu kažeš dosta više tog mučeništva ili počneš raspravu ko je kome, sagneš glavu u stidu i potpunom razumjevanju - posebno u razumjevanju.

ZMožda jezični box nije ništa posebno ali to je stvar iskrenog pristupa, a kao što evo vidiš, stvar senzibiliteta.

Posebno mi, koji živimo na Balkanu, a želimo o sebi misliti da smo iznad mentalnih blokada "zakletih neprijatelja", treba da imamo potpuno razumjevanje ne onoliko koliko nas naše privatne kalkulacije navode da (priznamo) razumijemo.

Možda tek onda možwemo početi pričati o faktima (iz istorije, geografije, prirode i društva).

(odgovorio bih ranije ali mi je editing conflict pojeo cijeli jedan post)--Santasa99 (talk) 02:56, 28 October 2009 (UTC) zamalo opet--Santasa99 (talk) 02:56, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Evo ja maknuo hr babel... Ionako se skuži po imenu da sam Hrvat. --Ivan Štambuk (talk) 03:00, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Vidiš da nije bilo razloga za ono početno "trzanje", znaš ono trkljaš i to. Šalu na stranu, jednu stvar moraš imati na umu, a to je upravo on na što sam mislio (s-h-s-h jezik), predugo je u Bosni Bošnjacima osporavano sve što se ostalim nije osporavalu. Veliki je to luxuz za Bošnjake razumjeti ako neko ponovo želi nešto s čime su se morali identificirati silom prilika jer nisu imali 2. izbora.--Santasa99 (talk) 03:05, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ja sam do prije 7-8 godina uporno odbijao rači da govorim Bosanski, mislio sam ako moram odustati od SH onda će se moj jezik zvati HR - više ne mislim tako ! Živio sam u splitu prvih 7 g života ali ja sa HR ne mogu da se identificiram, nema ništa HR u mojoj kulturi i jeziku. Iako sam etnički HR ja sam Bošnjak - naravno, nisam musliman a nisam ni vjernik ali nisam zbog toga ne-musliman (?). Buni li te to ? (sad bi bio fol da zbrišeš misleći - bože budale, a ?)--Santasa99 (talk) 03:14, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Mogao si ostavit i HR i postaviti BS, mislim, da ja držim oba - uglavnom to je OK, zar ne, sve što sad napišeš ima legitimitet u vlastitom priznanju (priznanje - recognition), legitimitet pred svima koje zanima tvoj stav.--Santasa99 (talk) 03:28, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ja sebe držim anacionalnim i aetničkim (nacije/etnije su imaginarni sociološki konstrukti, to uostalom svatko već zna). Rođenjem, odgojem i školovanjem sam vezan sa hrvatski uljudbeni krug i to je nešto što ne mogu izmijeniti. Koncepcija "bosanskog jezika" mi je obična sprdnja, baš kao i koncepcija "hrvatskog jezika", "srpskog jezika" i sad ovog novonastalog "crnogorskog jezika" (koji ima novi pravopis, ne znam je li znaš, uskoro dobiva i rječnik i gramatiku). Mogu kolko-tolko podržati hrvatsku regionalnu i stanadrdiziranu inačicu srpskohrvatskog, ali takozvani "hrvatski jezik" kao sredstvo kanaliziranja nacionalističkih potreba u opreci sa srpskim (praktički svi tuđmanovski zahvati u jezik su bili u samo i isključivo u opreci sa srpskim) nikad ne mogu priznati. Svatko tko išta zna o lingvistici zna da su to gluposti. Najbolji strani Slavisti (američki, britanski, njemački, nizozemski, ruski) se sprdaju sa balkanizacijom srpskohrvatskog, i rado ga analiziraju sa sociolingvističkog stajališta kao primjer neviđene nacionalističke zadrtosti. Što se njih tiče, sve je to jedan jezik - BCS, B/C/S, štokavski, srpskohrvatski...razni nazivi za jednu te istu stvar. --Ivan Štambuk (talk) 03:43, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nastavlja se .... (ako se slažeš, sutra u malo prikladnije vrijeme)--Santasa99 (talk) 04:15, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about the template below. Bearian (talk) 22:21, 25 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Marian Wenzel, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.bosnia.org.uk/bosrep/report_format.cfm?articleid=874&reportid=153. As a copyright violation, Marian Wenzel appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Marian Wenzel has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

• If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Marian Wenzel and send an email with the message to permissions-enwikimedia.org. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at Talk:Marian Wenzel with a link to where we can find that note.
• If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Marian Wenzel.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Bearian (talk) 22:20, 25 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please source the sentence for which I have asked for a citation, or I will remove the bullet point. -- PBS (talk) 09:42, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please, join the discussion.

Regards, --Wustenfuchs 12:00, 19 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't remove {{unreferenced}} from articles if you don't actually fix the problem. --Joy [shallot] (talk) 07:07, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]