Talk:Groove metal: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Thrashattack84 (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Bubba hotep (talk | contribs)
more accurate classification due to current size
Line 2: Line 2:
{{talkheader}}
{{talkheader}}
{{WPBS|1=
{{WPBS|1=
{{Genre|class=start}}
{{Genre|class=stub}}
{{WPRock|class=start|importance=low}}
{{WPRock|class=stub|importance=low}}
{{HMM|class=start|importance=mid}}
{{HMM|class=stub|importance=mid}}
}}
}}
{{Controversial}}
{{Controversial}}

Revision as of 23:39, 5 June 2010

Archive
Archives
May 2006 - February 2009


Reverted

This page as well as nu metal have been reverted. Learn to edit. You dont DELETE everything. You pick thorough the parts and if they are ABSOLUTELY FALSE or completely unverifiable, then remove it.70.119.201.161 (talk) 18:29, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Is this notable enough for an article?

If you look the words "groove metal" up on any search engine you wouldn't get much. I noticed people were using websites like last.fm and metal archives for history on the term during the discussion for the article's deletion, both non reliable sources. And the only reliable source even used in this article is Pantera's allmusic entry. The only other major sources I've really found on the genre are Blender refering to "Welcome to the Jungle" and I've read a book called The Rough Guide to Rock that dubs White Zombie "metal groove". Neither of which go indepth on any history. Terms in wider use like blues-metal, pop metal(well I tried to give this one a page, but it was unfortunatly deleted), and southern metal don't even have articles here. Can anyone find anything about this style's origin, history, anything? This article's notability is on thin ice. RG (talk) 01:47, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

What about "post-thrash"? Portillo (talk) 03:32, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

There is no evidence to support that these two terms are interchangeble. "Post-thrash" isn't really a notable style as well. RG (talk) 22:34, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Neither of these sources give a history of the music or a description of how the music sounds. Does anyone have any other reliable sources that mention this style? RG (talk) 00:31, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Allmusic hardly even recognises thrash as a genre, sure they have an article on it, and use the term in reviews the odd time, but they never use it as the actual genre of the album they are reviewing. And why the hell does it say groove metal is a mix between hip-hop, dance, and hard rock and the citation of which leads to something about Korn? hardly a groove metal band. Also why was it necessary to cut this article down so much, it was hardly the biggest and best in the first place. Since when was groove metal not a genre, look at the bands, I mean some of them are extrememly influential, just look at exhorder, pantera and machine head in particular. Why does there have to be this elitism? look at all these emo core genres a new one seems to be made every day and there seems to be plenty of articles on them at least last time I checked. I may start editing this article.--Thrashattack84 (talk) 12:47, 28 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

How about [1] Syxxpackid420 (talk) 12:50, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That reference isn't reliable. RG (talk) 18:28, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Groove Metal was given as a term to replace "Post-thrash". Groove metal is a genre. Get over it. This article isn't going to be deleted —Preceding unsigned comment added by 141.165.209.21 (talk) 15:54, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The amount of recognition this genre has, I'm surprised there aren't more sources explaining its existence. I mean, it's in pretty wide use... then again, that was shown by unreliable sources such as Metal Archives and Last.fm. There's going to be a lot of change around the metal-related parts of Wikipedia once this article's gone. (I'm not taking a side in anything here, just commenting.) --LordNecronus (talk) 20:02, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Rate Your Music

Can anyone give me a reason why Rate Your Music would be considered a reliable source? RG (talk) 18:09, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You're right its not so I've removed it Syxxpackid420 (talk) 08:19, 4 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]