Software: Computing
This page is within the scope of WikiProject Software, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of software on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SoftwareWikipedia:WikiProject SoftwareTemplate:WikiProject Softwaresoftware This page is supported by WikiProject Computing.

/archive /archive2

The peer review section cautions well against the changeability of articles, but maybe we should point out a way to view the article as it was when FA or other status was last reviewed, as in the CD for schools highlighted at the top of this talk-page and release versions as well ? LeeVJ (talk) 23:50, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"...Our active community of editors uses tools such..." should be changed to "...Our active community of editors use tools such..." (simply removing the s). Thanks, Eric-Wester (talk) 02:39, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That depends on the English dialect. I don't care either way though. If I change it, someone will eventually complain that it should be singular, and the cycle will go on and on. Graham87 03:12, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

{{editprotected}} Since, I think, the physical location of WM's servers also relocated can someone change it from Florida to California? A change is also needed on Wikipedia:Content disclaimer. Thanks. -- Mentisock 12:19, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No, the servers haven't moved; only the offices have moved. The Wikimedia Foundation projects were down for eleven hours when the main servers were moved across the street, so I'd hate to think how long the downtime would be if those servers were moved across the U.S. Graham87 15:51, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm usually pretty good with parsing legalese, but I'm not sure the first sentence in the section "No contract; limited license" is grammatical. It would make sense if there were a period after "sister projects", and I don't know how to relate "subject to your claims against them directly" with what comes before. Is "subject to..." a complement of "agreement or contract"? Is it an inadvertently blended sentence? It's not that I want it explained, I'm just trying to alert to what I think could possibly be a defect. -- Unconventional (talk) 04:40, 9 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]