This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects.

Websites: Computing Low‑importance This article is part of WikiProject Websites, an attempt to create and link together articles about the major websites on the web. To participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.WebsitesWikipedia:WikiProject WebsitesTemplate:WikiProject WebsitesWebsites Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Computing. Internet Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Internet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InternetWikipedia:WikiProject InternetTemplate:WikiProject InternetInternet Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Internet culture Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of internet culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Internet cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Internet cultureTemplate:WikiProject Internet cultureInternet culture Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. WikiProject Internet culture To-do: Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Article requests : View all requested internet culture articles Expand : Pick an article from here or here Photo : Category:Internet culture articles needing images Stubs : All stubs are located here Other : Category:Internet self-classification codes (!?); Try to get YouTube to FA; Tag all articles you find with {{WikiProject Internet culture}} See also Category:Internet culture articles needing attention

{{Controversial}} should not be used on pages subject to the contentious topic procedure. Please remove this template. Template:Not a forum Template:Annual readership

The following are reference ideas for Kiwi Farms. Click [show] for details. The following reference(s) may be useful when improving this article in the future: Urquhart, Evan (September 4, 2022). "Kiwi Farms was booted by Cloudflare. Deplatforming the anti-trans site shouldn't be controversial". Slate. Retrieved September 5, 2022. "2nd web-hosting provider drops harassment site Kiwi Farms". The Associated Press. September 5, 2022. Retrieved September 5, 2022. "La battaglia per fermare la piattaforma online che perseguita le persone trans" [The battle to stop the online platform that persecutes trans people]. Il Post (in Italian). September 5, 2022. Retrieved September 5, 2022. Venugopal, Sahana (September 6, 2022). "Explained: Why are web hosting providers de-platforming Kiwi Farms?". The Hindu. Retrieved September 6, 2022. Gilbert, David (September 7, 2022). "Inside Keffals' Battle to Bring Down Kiwi Farms". Vice News. Retrieved September 7, 2022. Covucci, David (September 15, 2022). "Kiwi Farms gets booted from another major domain". The Daily Dot. Retrieved September 18, 2022. Breland, Ali. "The Website That Wants You to Kill Yourself—and Won't Die". Mother Jones. No. March+April 2023. Retrieved February 2, 2023. Hall, Ellie. "The Notorious Kiwi Farms Is Back Online". Buzzfeed News. Retrieved February 4, 2023.

I don't know why having Moon's face plastered on the page makes sense, as the photo was uploaded by himself and to me this clearly violates WP:NAU. TheXuitts (talk) 21:04, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have no idea why he chose to upload it, or why he chose to upload such a bad picture. Quite possibly his intention was self-promotion but I don't think that automatically means that it violates WP:NAU for us to choose to use it so long as the use is valid for other reasons. It is not for him to make the article about himself but it is for us, collectively, to decide the extent to which the article is about him and, yes, to some extent it is. He is the guy behind this website and we cover that fact in the article. There is no harm in showing the world his face in illustration of that fact. The image is not "plastered" on the page. It is no larger than normal (i.e. the default thumbnail size) and it isn't right at the top, as it would be if the article were a biography. It is a good picture in the sense that it shows readers what he looks like (which might be helpful if they ever need to avoid him in the street) but it isn't a good picture in any aesthetic sense. I've seen better looking police mugshots. It doesn't enhance his prestige. Irrespective of his intentions, it doesn't actually serve to promote him in any way. DanielRigal (talk) 22:19, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

“Ever avoid him in the street” that made me smirk Dronebogus (talk) 20:40, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I think the image is well-placed and non-promotional. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 22:25, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedians frequently ask subjects of articles to upload photos that are Freely licenced, see https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Lizthegrey&diff=prev&oldid=1111454349 and https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Keffals&diff=prev&oldid=1119451124 for instance. It's an editorial decision as to how said images are used afterwards, but making them available is not a COI or self-promotion. lizthegrey (talk) 22:48, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Minor update, I'm not extended confirmed so I can't do it myself.

In the Harassment section, there's this sentence:

The incidents are being investigated as criminal harassment, and Sorrenti stated she intended to pursue legal action.

She has since filed a human rights complaint against the London Police Service ^[1] so I propose the sentence be updated to:

The incidents are being investigated as criminal harassment, and Sorrenti stated she has filed a Human Rights Complaint against the police for their actions during and before the swatting.^[1]

Egefeyzi (talk) 00:49, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Done with some copyedits. @Egefeyzi: In the future I'd recommend using {{edit extended-protected}} for similar requests. I saw this one because I'm watching this page, but other edit requests that you submit may not receive a prompt response to talk page watchers. The the template adds the talk page that it's on to Category:Wikipedia extended-protected redirects so that the request can be found and processed more easily. — SamX [talk · contribs] 02:06, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There also an article about the aftermath, with the police saying the only deadnaming done was the label on her property bag^[1], also from CTV News. I'm adding this after your edit. JungleEntity (talk) 03:28, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I have removed the content. This is an issue that Sorrenti has against the police. This is not about Kiwi Farms. It would be appropriate on the London police page and Sorrenti’s page but not here. starship.paint (exalt) 23:51, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm, I think it's not necessarily a bad change? To me, it reads as a logical continuation of the story. If the police's reaction to the swatting attempt is mentioned, it makes sense to me that the outcome resulting from that reaction is also discussed. --Licks-rocks (talk) 15:42, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I think all of Sorrenti’s drama with the police are out of scope for this article. While Kiwi Farms may have helped instigate this, they aren’t responsible for the accusations Sorrenti has put on the police. JungleEntity (talk) 17:22, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Licks-rocks: - we would require a reliable source connecting Kiwi Farms to the alleged human rights violation action. I believe the cited source does not even mention Kiwi Farms. starship.paint (exalt) 11:45, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oh yeah, that's a good point. --Licks-rocks (talk) 16:28, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What source do we have to corroborate this claim? It just seems like random assorted news articles that all got their claims from dubious sources. Toadguy64 (talk) 15:15, 30 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]