Wikipedia:WikiProject Lost/Banner

Archives

Archive 1 (Feb 2005 to Sep 2005) Archive 2 (Sep 2005 to Feb 2006) Archive 3 (Feb 2006 to Apr 2006) Archive 4 (Apr 2006 to May 2006) Archive 5 (Jun 2006 to Dec 2006) Archive 6 (Jan 2007 to ___ 2007)

In the character infobox, it says centric episodes and most of the characters have either Exodus: Part 1 or 2 in their list. Though they did have flashbacks in the 3-part season finale, the episode did not centre on them and I suggest we do not count the episode. --thedemonhog 22:24, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ABC have started listing them as guest stars each week in their press info for new episodes. They really don't need starring character status here. Tphi 15:34, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Regardless, they have still appeared as a main character in the opening credits. -- Wikipedical 22:11, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

They have always been credited as guest stars in the press releases. --thedemonhog 01:54, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ABC is only indirect involved with the production - for wich Touchstone Television and Bad Robot Productions are resposible - so I wouldn't pay much attention to what they say (cf. The ABC Diary and it's conections to the show). The only NPOV directive to go by is, imo, the opening credits of the show - in which both Kiele Sanchez and Rodrigo Santoro have been credited as starring since ep 3.01. Pjär80 12:56, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has been revert warring over the episode Hearts and Minds being a Shannon flashback instead of just Boone's. Can we put this to rest once and for all? I agree with the argument that Shannon isn't even present for much of the episode, both flashback and on the island, and it is all shown from Boone's point of view, which would make it Boone only for featured/flashback. Other opinions? --Milo H Minderbinder 15:15, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

As stated before: fan definitions of what a feature character is are non-encyclopaedic. You've failed to provide a citation from ABC that she isn't a flashback charater, the episode however appears to disagree with you, largely due to the fact Shannon is present.

Addendum: "An editor has been revert warring over", it takes two to tango, I believe you meant: "An editor [and I] ha[ve]s been revert warring over [...]" thanks/Fenton, Matthew Lexic Dark 52278 Alpha 771 15:41, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]