Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Chicago

Good article reassessment for Ferris Bueller's Day Off

Ferris Bueller's Day Off has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 21:27, 2 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for Ping Tom Memorial Park

Ping Tom Memorial Park has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 15:36, 3 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Pitchfork (website)#Requested move 14 January 2026 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. RedShellMomentum 21:11, 17 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for Patti Smith

Patti Smith has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 20:50, 23 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Ronald Joseph (figure skater)#Requested move 21 January 2026 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Thanks, 1isall (talk | contribs) 17:32, 28 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Forgotten Chicago

Does anyone think Forgotten Chicago is salvageable as an article? I tried looking for sources, but I'm not finding anything other than some social media sites, which aren't even close enough to meet WP:ORGDEPTH. Perhaps there's a way to redirect this to some other article? Otherwise, it appears to be in pretty much the same condition as when it was created back in 2008. It actually did have some citations back then, but, once again, nothing that would meet ORGDDEPTH. -- Marchjuly (talk) 07:10, 6 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I added a few refs. Nick Number (talk) 18:08, 6 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]