The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.‎

The result was redirect to Gulmarg#St Mary.27s Church. -- Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 01:24, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

St. Mary's Church, Gulmarg (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

PROD removed a few days ago. Couldn't find much on external references other than some passing glances in tourist guides. Not a part of List of Monuments of National Importance in Jammu and Kashmir or List of State Protected Monuments in Jammu and Kashmir or any other list of notable places I can find. Fails GNG and MAPOUTCOMES. South Nashua (talk) 20:35, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 21:25, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 21:26, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 21:27, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Having found a few more references and images online, this might have been a 'very weak keep'. However, I also found there is already a section on St Mary's Church in the article on Gulmarg itself, so I've now expanded that section, and see no reason for the church having an article of its own as it really isn't sufficiently notable, despite being an unusual building in an unusual location. Nick Moyes (talk) 01:01, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Merge to Gulmarg per Nick Moyes. James (^talk/_contribs) 15:09, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think there's now anything left to merge - it's all been put into the Gulmarg article, so I'd still propose deletion which would result in no net loss of wikipedia content. Nick Moyes (talk) 15:40, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Convert to REdirect for reasons above. Peterkingiron (talk) 15:39, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect, based on what's been explained here. --doncram 23:34, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect - not enough in article to salvage. Deathlibrarian (talk) 11:28, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:56, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.